Passmark Scores

[Det0x]

Hi,
All those scores cpu/ gpu/ disk look deadly but the total system score looks silly low in comparison

Yeah dunno what thats about.. all sub benches are pretty much maxed out at 100% so that total system score don't look right

 

[Petar666]

24/7
Windows 11 2H21-
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KF-5,7Ghz/E4.6Ghz/R4.7
Z690 MSI Unify x
EVGA RTX 3080TI FTW
G SKILL DDR5 32GB 7200MHz 34-42-42-34
Western Digital WD Black SN850 1TB
Custom liquid cooling

 

[AMF]

who has tried it?

 

[arabus]

 

[AMF]

 

[AMF]

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 34126

Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Calculate Linux, PeKWM, Mesa open-source driver, XFS file system

PassMark - CPU Mark results (high end CPUs)

PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks - High End

PassMark Software - CPU Benchmarks - Over 1 million CPUs and 1,000 models benchmarked and compared in graph form, updated daily!

www.cpubenchmark.net

Apparently I'm slightly below average but I didn't tweak the BIOS.
According to the results, my CPU performance is similar to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and the Intel Core i5-14600.

 

[AMF]

 

[SchumannFrequency]

View attachment 354006

In multi-threading, your CPU is still fast.
For example, you can compare it with Apple.

Apple M3 Pro 11 core multithread rating: 24613
Apple M3 Pro 12 core multithread rating: 27189
Apple M3 Max 14 core multithread rating: 36353 (minimum $3199)

 

[AMF]

In multi-threading, your CPU is still fast.
For example, you can compare it with Apple.

Apple M3 Pro 11 core multithread rating: 24613
Apple M3 Pro 12 core multithread rating: 27189
Apple M3 Max 14 core multithread rating: 36353 (minimum $3199)

many hours of tuning and gota have great ambient temps, its 22c in room

 

[SchumannFrequency]

many hours of tuning and gota have great ambient temps, its 22c in room

My room temperature is about 25°C. But I'm positively surprised about the temperature of this Intel 12700KF.
If I render the BMW twice in quick succession in Blender and measure the temperature during the very last second of the render, I see the following values:

The hottest core becomes 54°C when rendering with Blender. DeepCool AG500BK ARGB was a relatively cheap cooler but it doesn't seem to have any trouble with this CPU.
The GPU, on the other hand, gradually goes to 83°C in GravityMak. But one of my 2 140mm intake fans is not yet connected because I did not have a free connector on the motherboard.
Once this second 140mm intake fan is running, both CPU and GPU temperatures should be slightly better.

 

[AMF]

My room temperature is about 25°C. But I'm positively surprised about the temps of this Intel 12700KF.
If I render the BMW twice in quick succession in Blender and measure the temperature during the very last second of the render, I see the following values:

The hottest core becomes 54°C when rendering with Blender. DeepCool AG500BK ARGB was a relatively cheap cooler but it doesn't seem to have any trouble with this CPU.
The GPU, on the other hand, gradually goes to 83°C in GravityMak. But one of my 2 140mm intake fans is not yet connected because I did not have a free connector on the motherboard.
Once this second 140mm intake fan is running, both CPU and GPU temperatures should be slightly better.

what is the difference in temp on your cpu vs cpu diode ? i have an 11c difference at any givin time under load . and any hours of use. i believe the bigger the difference the better ur cooling solution is.

my idle temps

 

[SchumannFrequency]

what is the difference in temp on your cpu vs cpu diode ? i have an 11c difference at any givin time under load . and any hours of use. i believe the bigger the difference the better ur cooling solution is.View attachment 354015my idle temps

The diode is only in close proximity to the CPU, so it's the external CPU temperature.
I don't think this is always more precise. It is usually more reliable but not always.

I checked my sensors and there was only one additional sensor that I can activate.
But the default choice was not to use this sensor and the program advises to stay with the defaults unless you know what you are doing.

I have not often seen such good temperatures. My previous CPU in a different case reached 59° under load and it had sufficient cooling.
These are my temperatures when only the browser is open and when the system is almost idle.

Package id 0: +26.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 0: +25.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 4: +24.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 8: +23.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 12: +22.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 16: +25.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 20: +20.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 24: +22.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 28: +24.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 36: +23.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 37: +23.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 38: +23.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 39: +24.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)

2nd test.

Package id 0: +25.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 0: +24.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 4: +22.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 8: +23.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 12: +22.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 16: +25.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 20: +22.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 24: +22.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 28: +23.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 36: +24.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 37: +24.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 38: +24.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 39: +23.0°C (high = +80.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)

The DeepCool AG500BK ARGB came with a small bag containing thermal grease.
But I didn't want toxic materials on the kitchen scissors so I used my more than 15 year old Xilence Silver Tim tube and it still seems to do its job after all these years.

 

[Arctucas]

 

[AVATARAT]

The new toy 9700x:

The difference compared to my old 7700x doesn't seem like much, but the new CPUa prediction just made the 2D test run crazy fast:

Links:
7700x
9700x

 

[sophie]

 

[nwgpcl]

2x AMD EPYC 9004 series CPU

 

[Det0x]

CPU carrying overall score

PassMark Software - Display Baseline ID# 2200777

www.passmark.com

 

[nwgpcl]

My dual AMD EPYC 9004 series seems run faster than the top rank dual AMD EPYC 9684X

 

[SOS_Earth]

Not bad for DDR4

 

[Paramount]

 

[IntelNick]

My most recent run.

 

[[crs]]

My 2D Score seems wrong

EDIT: Gsync was turned on so that was the reason for the low 2D score, with it disabled it jumped up a lot

 

[way2aware]

Guess it was time for alittle update
Dont know how this scores globally, but here are result page

• Asus rog crosshair x670e hero
• 7950x with handtuned PBO CO
• 3090 with unlimited bios
• 32GB DDR @ 6200MT/s 28-35-35-36-38-48
• FCLK @ 2200mhz
• Single m.2 sk hynix platinum p41 1tb
• Custom liquid cooling

View attachment 266660
View attachment 266661View attachment 266662View attachment 266663View attachment 266665View attachment 266666

Superb 3d score on your 3090

 

[iameatingjam]

Think I probably could have squeezed more out of my 4090 if I tried but I'm more surprised at my memory score, these are 5600 cl36 sticks. I didn't even do any tuning really. Just put my bios to irresponsible mode (intel profile off, CEP off, ram at 6400 cl30 and trefi at 40,000, no other tuning).... could have swore it was lower before. Well it is a new cpu, and a new bios. Maybe one of the two had a positive effect. Or I'm just misremembering.

And I'm still making sure my cpu doesn't draw over 1.4v. Which is awesome. I know I can get good cpu performance at a reasonable voltage if I need it, even on my b board.

But still I'm going back to pussy settings now...... 6000 cl32 (1.175 vs 1.4 vddq_tx) and 5.1/3.9 (stays under 1.3vcore) and honestly, I can't tell the difference.