• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

GravityMark v1.89 GPU Benchmark

:D:D said:
While minimum shows 29.8 the graph shows all FPS above 100?
Click to expand...

It shows the frame rate per second, where it makes sense that you don't see the minimum and maximum.
It probably calculates with a simple formula how many fps were generated per second.
In a smaller time interval you would see that the min/max values are indeed correct.

Determining the maximum frame rate (equation):

Product Documentation - NI

www.ni.com www.ni.com
 
Last edited:
Would have thought FPS would have read x number of frames each second and graphed accordingly. IMO using 1 / single frame rate for FPS seems dumb and should just be shown as shortest frame time. Max FPS seems to be equal on graph and report although I only looked at a couple of results. If minimum FPS is instead supposed to be something like 1% minimum then should be stated as such.

Running a third party tool such as Mangohud under Linux shows some frame times much higher and lower than reported FPS. Average FPS is close though.
 
What is the folder directory where result is saved, when pressed SAVE button ?
 
1720476660810.png
 
Klemc said:
What is the folder directory where result is saved, when pressed SAVE button ?
Click to expand...
IIRC save takes a screenshot and saves under 'Documents'. If you click 'send' a link is saved there too or you could check GravityMark\.GravityMark.log under PC <username> folder.
 
Last edited:
7800X3D
B650E-E
KF560C32RSK2-32 - XMP SOC 1.07v
 

Attachments

  • GravityMark_000.png
    GravityMark_000.png
    5 MB · Views: 75
  • GravityMark_001.png
    GravityMark_001.png
    5 MB · Views: 86
  • GravityMark_002.png
    GravityMark_002.png
    5 MB · Views: 65
  • GravityMark_003.png
    GravityMark_003.png
    4.9 MB · Views: 70
  • GravityMark_004.png
    GravityMark_004.png
    5 MB · Views: 62
  • GravityMark_005.png
    GravityMark_005.png
    5 MB · Views: 73
Last edited:
:D:D said:
IMO using 1 / single frame rate for FPS seems dumb and should just be shown as shortest frame time.
Click to expand...

Technically, the term used is 'Min/Max'. It does not say min fps or max fps.
You can always contact the developer and ask how he calculates it.

1 / time for single slowest (or fastest) frame is a very useful statistic
To give an unrealistic example, suppose it takes half a second to calculate one frame and then it generates 98 frames in 0.5 second.
Then your fps is going to be 99. It seems that it runs smoothly if you would only look at the fps for that one second, but in reality it did not run smoothly.

:D:D said:
Running a third party tool such as Mangohud under Linux shows some frame times much higher and lower than reported FPS.
Click to expand...

This gives the impression that one of the two tools may not be reliable.
If you look at the source code of both tools you can probably see where the differences lie.

This reminds me of the following article: https://vermaden.wordpress.com/2022/07/12/desktop-environments-resource-usage-comparison/
Looking at the article you quickly come to the conclusion that each tool seems to calculate RAM usage differently.

There is software in circulation anyway that is just not reliable.
Many programming languages that are used are not optimal for the task for which they are used.
No super small percentage of programmers are weak in math, and many programmers are only really good at one or two programming languages (or not really strong in any programming language)

I am not saying this applies to this situation, but it is one possibility.
 
Last edited:
...new high score

145,611


GravityMark.jpg
 
152,424

serene and quiet during the benchmark, the 2 cards never got above 54C and the 2 cpus never got above 29C

record.jpg
 
Last edited:
9700x@PBO
7900 XT
Windows 23H2
Gravity_2k_DX12_63608.png


Gravity_2k_V_60213.png


Gravity_2k_V-RT_38258.png


Gravity_4k_V_37584.png


Gravity_FHD_V_69250.png
 
new highest score

GravityMark Leaderboard

GravityMark GPU Benchmark
gravitymark.tellusim.com gravitymark.tellusim.com


1750776356735.png



Not bad a for a little and quiet home PC
 
Last edited:
I agree, but overall the 5090 is not much of an improvement over the 4090

I was going to do 4k with a higher count
 
9700x PBO
RX 9070 XT +10%

Vulkan + Vulkan RT

GravityMark_FHD_Vulkan_71781.pngGravityMark_2k_Vulkan_RT_49966.pngGravityMark_2k_Vulkan_61795.pngGravityMark_4k_Vulkan_RT_31727.pngGravityMark_41142.pngGravityMark_FHD_Vulkan_RT_59847.png
 
Last edited:
Did some benches on my single 5090, but i have no idea what settings / options are the fastest..

1080p = ~120k
1750876405486.png


1440p = ~108k
1750876452037.png


2160p = ~83k
1750876489427.png


If i should run some spesific settings please let me know :)
 
Last edited:
Mesh Shaders are little bit faster

MS 1080p = ~129k
1750955188993.png

MS 1440p = ~115.7k
1750955233428.png

MS 2160p = ~87k
1750955272633.png

Tellusim said:
Wow, this is a significant leap over the 4090!:eek:

But that constant 600W power draw is a bit scary:

GravityMark Report | 2560x1440 | 107,977 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor | ROG CROSSHAIR X870E APEX ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.

GravityMark GPU Benchmark
gravitymark.tellusim.com gravitymark.tellusim.com
Click to expand...
All of the guys in the "top ranking" are using way past stock powerlimit, 600w is nothing :laugh:
www.3dmark.com

3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 Hall of Fame

The 3DMark.com Overclocking Hall of Fame is the official home of 3DMark world record scores.
www.3dmark.com www.3dmark.com

Just have to make sure you have a good power/amp spread :)
1750955622721.png
 
Last edited:
when I try to run in dx12 in the latest version I get a Direct 3d error message, seems to only work in Vulkan
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top