• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

The Official Thermal Interface Material thread

Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
109 (0.02/day)
I wish Igor would put these all on the same graph rather than having separate graphs for pastes and phase change materials. PTM7950's results are so good it seems anomalous. Thermal conductivity is one thing while real world performance is different. 75% of pastes in Tom's Hardware's mega test perform well. Helios didn't perform as well as I expected in Igor's test but Igor is testing what's possible not real world performance.

As long as you aren't trying to cool your PC with Kroger Gun Protection toothpaste you are fine. As enthusiasts we want the best cooling possible. We spend extra money to get 1% better results. Meanwhile the difference between most pastes and phase change materials is within margin of error. In my own testing the Thermal Grizzly kryosheet gave my GPU 2.7% more performance than MX-4. Was that money I spent on the Kryosheet worthwhile for a mere 2.7%? Yes. I would do it again. It was fun for me to test.


The gaps are much bigger on a small laptop CPU or bare die chip in general. Some pastes in this THG review are so much worse on my laptop CPU. For some reason most people think thermal paste is just for desktop CPUs with heatspreader and think the gaps are always so small between pastes on every chip.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,765 (1.38/day)
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
I finally applied the kryosheet to my CPU. I have minor temperature gains compared to a year old application of Kryonaught Extreme. Not really enough of a difference to matter.
 

freeagent

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
8,585 (3.79/day)
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Processor AMD R7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Thermalright Frozen Edge 360, 3x TL-B12 V2, 2x TL-B12 V1
Memory 2x8 G.Skill Trident Z Royal 3200C14, 2x8GB G.Skill Trident Z Black and White 3200 C14
Video Card(s) Zotac 4070 Ti Trinity OC
Storage WD SN850 1TB, SN850X 2TB, SN770 1TB
Display(s) LG 50UP7100
Case Fractal Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) JBL Bar 700
Power Supply Seasonic Vertex GX-1000, Monster HDP1800
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G213
VR HMD Oculus 3
Software Yes
Benchmark Scores Yes
TFX is so thick I do not understand how it pumps out :confused:

So far so good with my application of Heilos to my GPU.

SYY-157 on my CPU and things are just dandy I suppose.

Pump out.. really?? I don't even know what to say. Its 2024 lol.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,765 (1.38/day)
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
Strange how no major reviewer has tested Thermalright TFX, while TF7 and TF8 seemed common. It appears to have mostly fallen off the radar, despite claimed superiority over the TF8.

I've been happy with it for repasting laptop and NUC and a desktop build, with no issues except for the horrifying thickness. Wonder what they put into it.
Cant find anything about TFX apart from multiple complaints about pump out. I think PTM pads are honestly the way forward.
Igor's just did a test showing TFX had thermal conductivity similar to PTM7950.
 

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
24,077 (3.74/day)
Location
London,UK
System Name DarnGosh Edition
Processor AMD 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E GAMING PLUS
Cooling Thermalright AM5 Contact Frame + Phantom Spirit 120SE
Memory 2x32GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 6000 CL32-38-38-96
Video Card(s) Asus Dual Radeon™ RX 6700 XT OC Edition
Storage WD SN770 1TB (Boot)| 2x 2TB WD SN770 (Gaming)| 2x 2TB Crucial BX500| 2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300
Display(s) LG GP850-B
Case Corsair 760T (White) {1xCorsair ML120 Pro|5xML140 Pro}
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850 80+ GOLD
Mouse Logitech G502 X
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 11 Home
Benchmark Scores ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
So far so good with my application of Heilos to my GPU.

I was considering pasting up my 7800XT with heilos before putting it in. After seeing igors review I wasnt too sure about it. How are your before and after temps?
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,092 (3.77/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
Here is something I never quite understood; look at the temperature drop for a typical power, area, thickness and thermal conductivity

temp drop.jpeg

P = 100W
A = 3 cm^2
k = 20 W/(m.K)
Dx = 1/20 mm

How then can thermal pastes differ by say 2 to 3°C degrees?
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
109 (0.02/day)
TFX is so thick I do not understand how it pumps out :confused:

Too much filler maybe? Here is a good explanation of what can happen: https://koolingmonster.com/insights...ivity-and-is-it-always-good-for-thermal-paste

There are many complaints about the fast pump out of Thermalright TFX. I also can confirm TFX degrades really fast, on my laptop CPU it did.

Metal alloys that are most often used in thermal paste include: aluminum oxide, boron nitride, zinc oxide, and aluminum nitride

So what difference does this make for thermal paste? Recall that thermal paste is not just these alloys. There is also an oily (most of the time silicone) base to host them. Therefore, the more of the alloy you add to the base, the higher your thermal conductivity and the higher the ability of the thermal paste to transfer heat out to the heatsink.

This is where we crossover from theory into reality. Because most of the time our thermal paste doesn’t simply sit in a vacuum – it needs to be applied correctly and to function for long periods of time.
Achieving a “high” thermal conductivity (in this case, let’s say 10W/mK+) is actually very easy – all you have to do is keep adding filler (metal alloy) until you achieve that level of conductivity. But thermal paste’s job is not solely to transfer heat – it is also a gap filler for the micro-imperfections between the surface of CPU and heatsink where oxygen might be trapped.

If you add too much filler, you risk making the thermal paste too hard to spread, resulting in thick, uneven layers which result in poorer real-life performance. And because of the lack of base, high-filler thermal pastes will also degrade significantly faster when put through real use which will quickly result in poorer performance.
 

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
24,077 (3.74/day)
Location
London,UK
System Name DarnGosh Edition
Processor AMD 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E GAMING PLUS
Cooling Thermalright AM5 Contact Frame + Phantom Spirit 120SE
Memory 2x32GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 6000 CL32-38-38-96
Video Card(s) Asus Dual Radeon™ RX 6700 XT OC Edition
Storage WD SN770 1TB (Boot)| 2x 2TB WD SN770 (Gaming)| 2x 2TB Crucial BX500| 2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300
Display(s) LG GP850-B
Case Corsair 760T (White) {1xCorsair ML120 Pro|5xML140 Pro}
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850 80+ GOLD
Mouse Logitech G502 X
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 11 Home
Benchmark Scores ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
Here is something I never quite understood; look at the temperature drop for a typical power, area, thickness and thermal conductivity

View attachment 360503
P = 100W
A = 3 cm^2
k = 20 W/(m.K)
Dx = 1/20 mm

How then can thermal pastes differ by say 2 to 3°C degrees?

higher aluminium/zinc oxide content?
 

freeagent

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
8,585 (3.79/day)
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Processor AMD R7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Thermalright Frozen Edge 360, 3x TL-B12 V2, 2x TL-B12 V1
Memory 2x8 G.Skill Trident Z Royal 3200C14, 2x8GB G.Skill Trident Z Black and White 3200 C14
Video Card(s) Zotac 4070 Ti Trinity OC
Storage WD SN850 1TB, SN850X 2TB, SN770 1TB
Display(s) LG 50UP7100
Case Fractal Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) JBL Bar 700
Power Supply Seasonic Vertex GX-1000, Monster HDP1800
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G213
VR HMD Oculus 3
Software Yes
Benchmark Scores Yes
I was considering pasting up my 7800XT with heilos before putting it in. After seeing igors review I wasnt too sure about it. How are your before and after temps?
Marginal at best, about 3c better than SYY. Stock was pretty decent, I should have left it.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
1,380 (3.62/day)
Location
Nowhere
System Name I don't name my rig
Processor 14700K
Motherboard Asus TUF Z790
Cooling Air/water/DryIce
Memory DDR5 G.Skill Z5 RGB 6000mhz C36
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Super
Storage 980 Pro
Display(s) Some LED 1080P TV
Case Open bench
Audio Device(s) Some Old Sherwood stereo and old cabinet speakers
Power Supply Corsair 1050w HX series
Mouse Razor Mamba Tournament Edition
Keyboard Logitech G910
VR HMD Quest 2
Software Windows
Benchmark Scores Max Freq 13700K 6.7ghz DryIce Max Freq 14700K 7.0ghz DryIce Max all time Freq FX-8300 7685mhz LN2
Here is something I never quite understood; look at the temperature drop for a typical power, area, thickness and thermal conductivity

View attachment 360503
P = 100W
A = 3 cm^2
k = 20 W/(m.K)
Dx = 1/20 mm

How then can thermal pastes differ by say 2 to 3°C degrees?
Margin of error.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,092 (3.77/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
Maybe so, but then most any reasonable paste will do (regardless of thermal conductivity).

I am wondering if surface effects play a role that is not always recognized, namely, the analysis I did is not valid.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
1,380 (3.62/day)
Location
Nowhere
System Name I don't name my rig
Processor 14700K
Motherboard Asus TUF Z790
Cooling Air/water/DryIce
Memory DDR5 G.Skill Z5 RGB 6000mhz C36
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Super
Storage 980 Pro
Display(s) Some LED 1080P TV
Case Open bench
Audio Device(s) Some Old Sherwood stereo and old cabinet speakers
Power Supply Corsair 1050w HX series
Mouse Razor Mamba Tournament Edition
Keyboard Logitech G910
VR HMD Quest 2
Software Windows
Benchmark Scores Max Freq 13700K 6.7ghz DryIce Max Freq 14700K 7.0ghz DryIce Max all time Freq FX-8300 7685mhz LN2
Maybe so, but then most any reasonable paste will do (regardless of thermal conductivity).

I am wondering if surface effects play a role that is not always recognized.
Yes, this could be variations in surface mating and surface area. Still would be minor.

I would think ambient temp sway would be a culprit too. My furnace has a 4° temp swing from on to off for example.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,765 (1.38/day)
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
Here is something I never quite understood; look at the temperature drop for a typical power, area, thickness and thermal conductivity

View attachment 360503
P = 100W
A = 3 cm^2
k = 20 W/(m.K)
Dx = 1/20 mm

How then can thermal pastes differ by say 2 to 3°C degrees?
I always assume large differences come down to user error in application of paste. One benefit of these phase change pads and the kryosheet is you remove user error. You can't apply it too thick or unevenly.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,092 (3.77/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
There is still ShrimpBrime's 'My furnace has a 4° temp swing from on to off' which indeed would explain the 2 to 3°C degrees, although since his location is 'Nowhere' I'm not sure if he meant F or C
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
109 (0.02/day)
I always assume large differences come down to user error in application of paste. One benefit of these phase change pads and the kryosheet is you remove user error. You can't apply it too thick or unevenly.

On a small laptop chip I can say the difference can be huge between a top paste or PTM and mediocre average paste. Runny pastes like MX-4 doesn't really work and would probably even worse for longevity. Kryosheet didn't work either by the way, phase change pad is better for a laptop chip. Most people doesn't really know that, I mean who is really testing it out with 10+ pastes. Mostly it's based from heatspreader chip testing where the margin will be much much smaller.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
1,380 (3.62/day)
Location
Nowhere
System Name I don't name my rig
Processor 14700K
Motherboard Asus TUF Z790
Cooling Air/water/DryIce
Memory DDR5 G.Skill Z5 RGB 6000mhz C36
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Super
Storage 980 Pro
Display(s) Some LED 1080P TV
Case Open bench
Audio Device(s) Some Old Sherwood stereo and old cabinet speakers
Power Supply Corsair 1050w HX series
Mouse Razor Mamba Tournament Edition
Keyboard Logitech G910
VR HMD Quest 2
Software Windows
Benchmark Scores Max Freq 13700K 6.7ghz DryIce Max Freq 14700K 7.0ghz DryIce Max all time Freq FX-8300 7685mhz LN2
There is still ShrimpBrime's 'My furnace has a 4° temp swing from on to off' which indeed would explain the 2 to 3°C degrees, although since his location is 'Nowhere' I'm not sure if he meant F or C
4F would be 2C temp swing. I am in US.

Is he now here, or no where? Some prefer me not here maybe.
 

freeagent

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
8,585 (3.79/day)
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Processor AMD R7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Thermalright Frozen Edge 360, 3x TL-B12 V2, 2x TL-B12 V1
Memory 2x8 G.Skill Trident Z Royal 3200C14, 2x8GB G.Skill Trident Z Black and White 3200 C14
Video Card(s) Zotac 4070 Ti Trinity OC
Storage WD SN850 1TB, SN850X 2TB, SN770 1TB
Display(s) LG 50UP7100
Case Fractal Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) JBL Bar 700
Power Supply Seasonic Vertex GX-1000, Monster HDP1800
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G213
VR HMD Oculus 3
Software Yes
Benchmark Scores Yes
We lurves ya :)

At least I do.. :laugh:

No eye contact makes it ok somehow :twitch:
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
5,545 (1.02/day)
Location
Gougeland (NZ)
System Name Cumquat 2021
Processor AMD RyZen R7 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus Strix X670E - E Gaming WIFI
Cooling Deep Cool LT720 + CM MasterGel Pro TP + Lian Li Uni Fan V2
Memory 32GB GSkill Trident Z5 Neo 6000
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ OC RX6800 16GB DDR6 2270Cclk / 2010Mclk
Storage 1x Adata SX8200PRO NVMe 1TB gen3 x4 1X Samsung 980 Pro NVMe Gen 4 x4 1TB, 12TB of HDD Storage
Display(s) AOC 24G2 IPS 144Hz FreeSync Premium 1920x1080p
Case Lian Li O11D XL ROG edition
Audio Device(s) RX6800 via HDMI + Pioneer VSX-531 amp Technics 100W 5.1 Speaker set
Power Supply EVGA 1000W G5 Gold
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core Wired
Keyboard Logitech G915 Wireless
Software Windows 11 X64 PRO (build 23H2)
Benchmark Scores it sucks even more less now ;)

Acfeiln

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Messages
2 (0.02/day)
Here is something I never quite understood; look at the temperature drop for a typical power, area, thickness and thermal conductivity

View attachment 360503
P = 100W
A = 3 cm^2
k = 20 W/(m.K)
Dx = 1/20 mm

How then can thermal pastes differ by say 2 to 3°C degrees?
I'm not sure I fully parse your question, so apologies in advance for any misunderstanding or if I say too much you already know. But that equation (a model for thermal conduction) is not one for ΔT between CPU and ambient, nor is it one for comparing two TIMs. Instead it tells you about conduction through a single TIM application. Your ΔT is the temperature difference between the CPU-end and cooler-end of the TIM itself. (Are you asking: if that number is so tiny, how can there be so much variation among different ones leading to single-digit CPU temp changes? If so, completely valid, I think I just didn't read you write the first time. Regardless...)

Seperately, how is your Dx so small? 5% of one millimeter? Where is that from? (This will show up later as well.)

In any case, I got curious, so here's an attempt to model the CPU temperature difference between two TIM applications. Lots of simplifications and bla bla bla I don't expect extreme accuracy or anything, but I burned an evening with this in my head so here we are.

Modeling CPU Temp. Difference Between TIMs​

Here's a visual sketch of our two imaginary setups.
sketch-setup.png


I'll call the TIM applicaiton thicknesses by d rather than Δx to save some space. The two cross-sectional areas are denoted by A. Temperatures are all denoted T, and a note about each one:
  • T1 is the temperature at the CPU/TIM 1 interface. T2 is the temperature at the CPU/TIM 2 interface. The quantity we're after is T1−T2, the difference in CPU temps given two different TIM applications and all else being equal.
  • Tb is the temperature at the TIM/cooler base plate interface. For reasons I'll outline in the assumptions, this will be the same for both TIM applications.
  • Tambient is the ambient air temperature. We assume this is the same for both TIM applications.

Addtl. Assumptions I'm Making​

  1. The CPUs are identical, operating in steady state, and dissipating power P in both cases. This means the power through each TIM and through each cooler must be P: otherwise the TIM (or cooler) would itself be accumulating or losing internal energy over time, neither of which are stable scenarios.
  2. Perfect (read: I will completely ignore) thermal contact conductance between the CPU/TIM and TIM/cooler interfaces. You're welcome to follow the process here and relax this assumption on your own to see how it turns out!
  3. I'm ignoring any inhmogeneity in temperature across the surface of the chip, so I'm not considering "hot spots."
  4. Identical coolers. This makes a big difference, because it allows me to get away with not modeling the cooler at all. The point is that the cooler thermally connects the TIM contact with the ambient temperature—perhaps with heatpipes and fins and a fan; perhaps through liquid cooling and a radiator and fans; perhaps something more exotic. But as long as they conduct the same power P, and as long as that's linear in ΔT between b and ambient (as it would be for a convective model), that forces the two Tbs to equality, regardless of what other dependencies there are in the cooler's operation (as long as those conditions are equal for both TIM applications). This lets us ignore the cooler.

Working it out​

Start with TIM 1. We have a relationship between the heat conducted and temperature change along the thickness d1 (the heat conduction equation you cited):

eq1.png
,

where k1 is the thermal conductivity of TIM 1. We have the same equation for TIM 2, with the subscripts changed. These are both "true" equations for conduction along each of the TIMs independently. But the fact that they must be conducting the same power and the equality of their Tbs connects them.

Now we'll take the difference:

eq2.png
,

and voilà! I'm leaving this here to highlight the fact that not only the conductances but also the thickness and cross-sectional areas of the applied TIMs will make a difference here. But that's difficult to control and/or measure, so I'll make one further simplificaiton before plugging in numbers: suppose the two TIMs are applied with the exact same thickness over the exact same area. (This is obviously not how it goes irl: different properties of the TIM and variance in user application will lead to different numbers there.) Then we have:

eq3.png
.

We can quickly see this passes a sanity check: if k1 > k2, then T1 < T2, so a higher conductance TIM indeed gives a lower CPU temperature. Plugging in your numbers P = 100 W, A = 9 cm^2 (assuming you meant 3 cm × 3 cm area), d = 0.05 mm (though this seems insanely thin, where'd you get this from?) and comparing, say, Conductonaut at 73 W/m K vs TL-A40 at 15 W/m K (both from here) we get a temperature difference of about 0.3 K. But I'll draw attention again to that d: the temp. difference is linear in that, so adjusting to half a millimeter of thickness brings us to ~3 K temperature difference. We can also see this scales linearly with conducted power: so the difference will get bigger with more power draw. It does not scale linearly with the difference in conductances, though, which is why liquid metal isn't like an order of magnitude better than the competition.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
713 (0.22/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name D30 w.2x E5-2680; T5500 w.2x X5675;2x P35 w.X3360; 2x Q33 w.Q9550S/Q9400S & laptops.
Here is something I never quite understood; look at the temperature drop for a typical power, area, thickness and thermal conductivity

View attachment 360503
P = 100W
A = 3 cm^2
k = 20 W/(m.K)
Dx = 1/20 mm

How then can thermal pastes differ by say 2 to 3°C degrees?
They do not...as there is only the application impurities, that are in question...that is why I said: all these tests with CPU are not OK.
Example: if I do not like one company, I am could sabotage the spread & get worse results. :cool:

Now, if you look at Igor's lab (which is probably ar some university), then you can see what professional measurement is all about:

  • always same equipment
  • always the same pressure between source & radiator unit
  • 3 sets of data measurement in order for a quite the good correction
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,561 (1.47/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling 2x 360 + 280 rads. 3x Gentle Typhoons, 3x Phanteks T30, 2x TT T140 . EK-Quantum Momentum Monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX. Water block. Crossflashed.
Storage Optane 900P[Fedora] + WD BLACK SN850X 4TB + 750 EVO 500GB + 1TB 980PRO+SN560 1TB(W11)
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO
Audio Device(s) SMSL RAW-MDA1 DAC
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software FEDORA 41
tests with CPU are not OK.
Example: if I do not like one company, I am could sabotage the spread & get worse results. :cool:
  • always same equipment
  • always the same pressure between source & radiator unit
  • 3 sets of data measurement in order for a quite the good correction

I agree, also that most of these tests are bullshit same as audio reviews, bullshit presentation without structural data, subjective, prone to failure and moon phase and morning horoscope. I better watch comedians, at least they make me laugh not because of sadness. The best bullshit comes when reviewer makes a complaint that is impossible to solve with the current technologies.

There is one caveat to this test. It only has one energy source, hotspot, basically you measure only one axis, some materials are worse or better transferring energy in different axis, or totally suck at it like graphene.

Also PTM in paste form needs a break in period, paste needs drying also, then it gets usable, people use it the wrong way. I also only use the PTM7958 pads only... but that's Igor... he often manages to mess up also.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,092 (3.77/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
Seperately, how is your Dx so small? 5% of one millimeter? Where is that from?

...
d = 0.05 mm (though this seems insanely thin, where'd you get this from?)

Take a ream of photocopy paper
  • 500 sheets = 5 cm
so, 0.1 mm a sheet, and that paper is thick; so, 1/20 mm may actually be too large an estimate.

so adjusting to half a millimeter of thickness brings us to ~3 K temperature difference.

Half a millimeter seems unreasonably large, even 1/20 mm may be too large.

I burned an evening with this in my head

The start equation is all that is needed, no need to complicate it.
temp drop.jpg
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
1,380 (3.62/day)
Location
Nowhere
System Name I don't name my rig
Processor 14700K
Motherboard Asus TUF Z790
Cooling Air/water/DryIce
Memory DDR5 G.Skill Z5 RGB 6000mhz C36
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Super
Storage 980 Pro
Display(s) Some LED 1080P TV
Case Open bench
Audio Device(s) Some Old Sherwood stereo and old cabinet speakers
Power Supply Corsair 1050w HX series
Mouse Razor Mamba Tournament Edition
Keyboard Logitech G910
VR HMD Quest 2
Software Windows
Benchmark Scores Max Freq 13700K 6.7ghz DryIce Max Freq 14700K 7.0ghz DryIce Max all time Freq FX-8300 7685mhz LN2
They do not...as there is only the application impurities, that are in question...that is why I said: all these tests with CPU are not OK.
Example: if I do not like one company, I am could sabotage the spread & get worse results. :cool:

Now, if you look at Igor's lab (which is probably ar some university), then you can see what professional measurement is all about:

  • always same equipment
  • always the same pressure between source & radiator unit
  • 3 sets of data measurement in order for a quite the good correction
But no processor. The end resulted data is great for the measurement of those two blocks of copper. Neither is a common cpu cooler, and neither is a cpu. If it where a cpu, it would need to be nickel plated copper.

Is this testing actually accurate for the intended uses? At least what we do have is constant pressure. So that's a good thing.

So this thermal paste does X wm/k an hour between those 2 specific pieces of copper. That's what we get from that lab testing.

The question is, would this study be close enough to realistic usage in a PC??
 

Acfeiln

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Messages
2 (0.02/day)
Take a ream of photocopy paper
  • 500 sheets = 5 cm
so, 0.1 mm a sheet, and that paper is thick; so, 1/20 mm may actually be too large an estimate.



Half a millimeter seems unreasonably large, even 1/20 mm may be too large.



The start equation is all that is needed, no need to complicate it.
View attachment 360568
Yeah I definitely was an order of magnitude off in my head as to what's reasonable, that was my bad. But I'd be surprised if we expect much thinner than say 0.1 mm consistently in an application (there will presumably be thinner and thicker sections), because that amounts to a full half-size compression of something like a Kryosheet, and if it's reasonable to expect more than that consistently I'd imagine they'd make it thinner to start with. But I don't know anything really about these materials so lots of room for me to be wrong on that!

That said, I'll push back on "start equation is all that is needed" with an asterisk: it's true that's all you need to estimate a temperature drop through a particular TIM from CPU-end to cooler-end (which may well have been what you meant from the start). But if the goal is explicitly to compare two TIMs you definitely need both and a way to combine them, even if it turns out the numerics matched pretty well, and my burned evening was plenty of fun ;) (I modeled the cooler explicitly and worked all the way through it before realizing I could completely ignore it...fun!)
 
Top