- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Messages
- 564 (0.37/day)
- Location
- Greece
System Name | Office / HP Prodesk 490 G3 MT (ex-office) |
---|---|
Processor | Intel 13700 (90° limit) / Intel i7-6700 |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Gaming H770 Pro / HP 805F H170 |
Cooling | Noctua NH-U14S / Stock |
Memory | G. Skill Trident XMP 2x16gb DDR5 6400MHz cl32 / Samsung 2x8gb 2133MHz DDR4 |
Video Card(s) | Asus RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC GDDR6X / Zotac GTX 1650 GDDR6 OC |
Storage | Samsung 2tb 980 PRO MZ / Samsung SSD 1TB 860 EVO + WD blue HDD 1TB (WD10EZEX) |
Display(s) | Eizo FlexScan EV2455 - 1920x1200 / Panasonic TX-32LS490E 32'' LED 1920x1080 |
Case | Nanoxia Deep Silence 8 Pro / HP microtower |
Audio Device(s) | On board |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime PX750 / OEM 300W bronze |
Mouse | MS cheap wired / Logitech cheap wired m90 |
Keyboard | MS cheap wired / HP cheap wired |
Software | W11 / W7 Pro ->10 Pro |
Yeah I voted 10-15%, still high, based on IPC and cache...I think you're right. In my own, way-off the mark thread here, this is what we generally thought:
View attachment 366585
The scary part is: Intel's "First-Party Benchmarks" are usually fantastically optimistic.... and a large chunk of people did think that there would be SOME improvement. So IMO this looks like it's going to generally miss expectations in the broader market.
I legitimately thought the APO team, faster ram etc. etc. would net some gains in games (since tuning ram and turning of HT on a 14900K can get you +10% over stock, reduce power draw, without any IPC increase or other improvements).
At least no itch for an upgrade (yet)...