• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Leak Exposes Seven New Intel Core Ultra 200S Processors, Including T & F Series

Nomad76

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
May 21, 2024
Messages
690 (3.50/day)
Intel is expanding its Core Ultra 200S lineup with seven new SKUs, a recent leak by @momomo_us shows. The leak gives details on non-K, T, and F versions across the Core Ultra 5 7, and 9 families. The top-end Core Ultra 9 285 will come in 65 W and 35 W versions. These match the 285K's 24-core setup but run at lower speeds. The 285T keeps the 4-core Xe built-in graphics.

The Core Ultra 7 series adds three models: 265 265F, and 265T. All share a 30 MB L3 cache being differentiated by different clock speeds. The T version has much lower base clocks. For the Core Ultra 5 series, the leak shows two models: 225 and 225F. Both have 10 cores running at 3.3/4.9 GHz (P-cores) and 2.7/4.4 GHz (E-cores), with 2 Xe GPU cores and a 65 W TDP. Unlike their higher-end models, this tier doesn't plan to have a T version right now.



Wccftech reports that we can expect to see more locked models in the Core Ultra 3 range (235, 215, and 205), however this leak didn't include them.

SKUs | Cores | P-Core (Base/Boost) | E-Core (Base/Boost) | L3 Cache | TDP
  • Core Ultra 9 285T | 24 (8-P + 16-E) | 1.4/5.4 GHz | 1.2/4.5 GHz | 36 MB | 35 W
  • Core Ultra 9 285 | 24 (8-P + 16-E) | 2.5/5.6 GHz | 1.9/4.6 GHz | 36 MB | 65 W
  • Core Ultra 7 265T | 20 (8-P + 12-E) | 1.5/5.3 GHz | 1.2/4.6 GHz | 30 MB | 35 W
  • Core Ultra 7 265F | 20 (8-P + 12-E) | 2.4/5.3 GHz | 1.8/4.6 GHz | 30 MB | 65 W
  • Core Ultra 7 265 | 20 (8-P + 12-E) | 2.4/5.3 GHz | 1.8/4.6 GHz | 30 MB | 65 W
  • Core Ultra 5 225F | 10 (6-P + 4-E) | 3.3/4.9 GHz | 2.7/4.4 GHz | 20 MB | 65 W
  • Core Ultra 5 225 | 10 (6-P + 4-E) | 3.3/4.9 GHz 2.7/4.4 GHz | 20 MB | 65 W

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,757 (1.03/day)
To be honest, if Intel is unable to meaningfully optimize their Arrow Lake K CPUs in the near future, it will negatively impact demand for these lower powered versions. Not to mention, I think there was a leak earlier that suggested that non-K SKUs will not be able to run the memory as fast as the K SKUs, which again, will negatively impact performance.
 

Nomad76

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
May 21, 2024
Messages
690 (3.50/day)
To be honest, if Intel is unable to meaningfully optimize their Arrow Lake K CPUs in the near future, it will negatively impact demand for these lower powered versions. Not to mention, I think there was a leak earlier that suggested that non-K SKUs will not be able to run the memory as fast as the K SKUs, which again, will negatively impact performance.
Remain to be seen as Intel says that "a set of future patches will fix them".
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,874 (0.64/day)
I guess the rest will be something like

235 - 6P x 8E
215 - 6P
205 - 4P

Hopefully no more 2P only CPUs.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,794 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Save for the 225, I'm not sure what was leaked here. Intel has had K, F and T variants for ages. With the exact meaning we see here.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
320 (0.20/day)
Gaming performance so mediocre with the 265K (although the 1% lows are decent), I worry how slow a 65W 265 might be. Still interested in seeing how it does though.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2022
Messages
44 (0.06/day)
System Name GIGABYTE BLUE PRO
Processor INTEL CORE i7-4770k
Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-Z87X-UD3H
Cooling noctua NH-D12L
Memory HyberX fury DDR3 32GB (4X8)
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 AMP White Edition
Storage WD Blue SATA 1TB SSD, WD blue 1TB HDD, Seagate BarraCuda 4TB HDD
Display(s) Lenovo legion Y25-30
Case GIGABYTE GZ-G1 PLUS
Power Supply GIGABYTE SUPERB 720
Mouse Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse v2.0
Keyboard Microsoft Wired Keyboard 600
Software Windows 11 Pro
most likely the T series for OEMs, other models i expected to release later after initial launch of high end cpus.
btw when will core utlra 3 will launch for desktop cpu?
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,492 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
Gaming performance so mediocre with the 265K (although the 1% lows are decent), I worry how slow a 65W 265 might be. Still interested in seeing how it does though.
It's basically within 2% of the 7950x in gaming (720p) while consuming 77w (vs 116 for the 7950x). I don't think the 65w will impact it that much.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
190 (0.26/day)
The 265K is less efficient than a 7700X in most applications according to TPU,limiting these to 65W means they'll be even slower compared to previous gen.
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,492 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
The 265K is less efficient than a 7700X in most applications according to TPU,limiting these to 65W means they'll be even slower compared to previous gen
Limiting the to 65w will make them both more efficient and faster than the 7700x you just mentioned.

I don't know where you got your numbers from but according to TPU, the 7700x consumes 135w vs 155w for the i7 in blender but the i7 finishes in half the time. The 7700x is obnoxiously inefficient compared to the i7.
 
Joined
Aug 18, 2022
Messages
365 (0.44/day)
I guess the rest will be something like

235 - 6P x 8E
215 - 6P
205 - 4P

Hopefully no more 2P only CPUs.
Based on previous leaks the 235 should be a Core Ultra 5 processor with 10 cores (6-P + 4-E). P cores base of 3.4 GHz boosting to 5.0 GHz.

The 215 and 205 have been claimed to be Core Ultra 3 processors with 8 cores (4-P + 4-E). 215 said to have P cores base of 3.9 GHz boosting to 4.8 GHz.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
987 (0.69/day)
Processor E5-4627 v4
Motherboard VEINEDA X99
Memory 32 GB
Video Card(s) 2080 Ti
Storage NE-512
Display(s) G27Q
Case DAOTECH X9
Power Supply SF450
Since the 10 cores in 225 is the equivalent of 8/16 threads, this is a 33% better offering than the 12400F, only if it's fully ported on N3 and no more than 2 tiles same as Lunar lake. Realistically, this 6+4 SKU could be a new tile variant. probably not a 8+16 tile. Just add 2 P cores to Lunar and INtel could have a winner here if the price is right.
 
Low quality post by Lycanwolfen
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
276 (0.10/day)
Location
Montreal Canada
I really could care less, Switched to AMD now pure 16 core monster and it shows. No E core no I core just pure 16 core Performance and man does it shine. It's like Ford in the GT40 for a test drive saying I had no Idea.
AMD is king sorry intel you lost it.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,741 (1.40/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Sorry, this generation is already doomed.
Instead of focusing on those garbage CPUs, Intel should focus on the next gen and bring something substantial to the table.
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2024
Messages
1 (0.03/day)
Location
Malaysia
Processor Intel Core i5-13400
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming B760M-Plus WIFI
Cooling Intel stock air cooler
Memory Kingston Fury 32GB DDR5-5600 (16GB x2)
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Storage Kingston NV2 PCIe 4.0 x4 1TB
Case Cooler Master Elite 311
Power Supply 1st Player Steampunk 850W
I really could care less, Switched to AMD now pure 16 core monster and it shows. No E core no I core just pure 16 core Performance and man does it shine. It's like Ford in the GT40 for a test drive saying I had no Idea.
AMD is king sorry intel you lost it.
Not everyone would like just focusing on performance core, also you said "AMD is king" are only when they got the best CPUs in THIS generation, but I won't 100% guaranteed of every company in future life.
 

95Viper

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
13,001 (2.20/day)
Stay on topic.
Don't be making this a "I' versus "A" thread.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
964 (0.63/day)
System Name ASUS TUF F15
Processor Intel Core i7-11800H
Motherboard ASUS FX506HC
Cooling Laptop built-in cooling lol
Memory 24 GB @ 3200
Video Card(s) Intel UHD & Nvidia RTX 3050 Mobile
Storage Adata XPG SX8200 Pro 512 GB
Display(s) Laptop built-in 144 Hz FHD screen
Audio Device(s) LOGITECH 2.1-channel
Power Supply ASUS 180W PSU
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 7 TKL
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 21H2 LTSC
I guess the rest will be something like

235 - 6P x 8E
215 - 6P
205 - 4P

Hopefully no more 2P only CPUs.
hopefully no amd 8000 series nonsense with "e-core" count dominating the p-cores...
 
Top