• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

i9-14900HX unstable with single core benchmarks but stable multi-core?

firemustache

New Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2024
Messages
2 (2.00/day)
I'm trying to understand why my cpu is stable doing multi core tasking such as benchmarks but I get sometimes
BSOD or other instability issues when doing heavy single core tasks such as single core benchmarks or the known
Lastpass cpu usage issue with Firefox.

Anyone could have an idea of why this could happen?

Below are my current FIVR settings. Current undervolt values are 135mV for Pcore, Pcache and 50mV for Ecache.

Also, I was able to undervolt down to -160mV and run multi core benchmarks with no crash. But single core
benchmarks were crashing 2-3 times as much!

OH... and I forgot to mention... in my Lenovo Legion 7i BIOS, "Current Excursion Protection" is disabled.
I don't know if this option should be enabled or not, but I tried on "enabled" and I'm getting the same
outcomes.

Screenshot 2024-12-04 063945.png
 

unclewebb

ThrottleStop & RealTemp Author
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
7,977 (1.32/day)
Anyone could have an idea of why this could happen?
Traditional offset undervolting is a compromise. It reduces the voltage along the entire frequency curve. Your -135 mV undervolt may be stable when the CPU is using the 52 multiplier but this same undervolt is not stable when the CPU is lightly loaded. When 1 or 2 cores are active and the CPU is using the 58 multiplier, your CPU needs more voltage to be stable. When undervolting, not enough voltage is almost always the reason a CPU will crash.

I was able to undervolt down to -160mV and run multi core benchmarks with no crash
At the moment you have a couple of choices. You could under clock your CPU so it no longer ever uses the 58 multiplier. That would mean setting all 8 Turbo Groups to a constant value like 52. You will lose some light load performance but this might let you reliably use your -160 mV undervolt. If you do not do this your other option is to keep reducing your -135 mV undervolt until you reach a point where your CPU is stable at both full load and light load. Both options are not ideal.

What would really be useful is instead of using one offset voltage for the entire voltage frequency curve, what if you could combine your offset voltage with a few tweaks at different frequencies? That is basically what the mV Boost feature does. It adds voltage at 800 MHz to help maintain stability when you use a big offset undervolt. Instead of mV Boost that only handles the offset undervolt problem at one frequency, how about V/F Point Offset tuning that allows some voltage adjustments at multiple frequencies? Your CPU is the perfect candidate for that. You need to be able to add some extra voltage when you are undervolting and the CPU is using the 58 multiplier. Here is a mock-up.

TS961.png


Access to the core and the cache voltage curves individually might also be useful. Never hurts to dream, right?

This is more than just a Photoshop mock-up. This new ThrottleStop feature is actually up and running. Send me a message if you are interested in doing some beta testing. So far everything seems to be working correctly. I do not own a 14900HX so I am not sure what is going to be possible. I have a good feeling that this new feature is going to help people like yourself achieve a more aggressive full load undervolt as well as a more stable part load undervolt. The best of both worlds. The V/F tuning feature is only available on unlocked, 10th Gen and newer, HX and K series processors.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,464 (3.28/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
CPU achieve higher clocks the fewer cores are under load, it makes sense for it to be most unstable under single core benchmarks.
 

firemustache

New Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2024
Messages
2 (2.00/day)
Traditional offset undervolting is a compromise. It reduces the voltage along the entire frequency curve. Your -135 mV undervolt may be stable when the CPU is using the 52 multiplier but this same undervolt is not stable when the CPU is lightly loaded. When 1 or 2 cores are active and the CPU is using the 58 multiplier, your CPU needs more voltage to be stable. When undervolting, not enough voltage is almost always the reason a CPU will crash.


At the moment you have a couple of choices. You could under clock your CPU so it no longer ever uses the 58 multiplier. That would mean setting all 8 Turbo Groups to a constant value like 52. You will lose some light load performance but this might let you reliably use your -160 mV undervolt. If you do not do this your other option is to keep reducing your -135 mV undervolt until you reach a point where your CPU is stable at both full load and light load. Both options are not ideal.

What would really be useful is instead of using one offset voltage for the entire voltage frequency curve, what if you could combine your offset voltage with a few tweaks at different frequencies? That is basically what the mV Boost feature does. It adds voltage at 800 MHz to help maintain stability when you use a big offset undervolt. Instead of mV Boost that only handles the offset undervolt problem at one frequency, how about V/F Point Offset tuning that allows some voltage adjustments at multiple frequencies? Your CPU is the perfect candidate for that. You need to be able to add some extra voltage when you are undervolting and the CPU is using the 58 multiplier. Here is a mock-up.

View attachment 374427

Access to the core and the cache voltage curves individually might also be useful. Never hurts to dream, right?

This is more than just a Photoshop mock-up. This new ThrottleStop feature is actually up and running. Send me a message if you are interested in doing some beta testing. So far everything seems to be working correctly. I do not own a 14900HX so I am not sure what is going to be possible. I have a good feeling that this new feature is going to help people like yourself achieve a more aggressive full load undervolt as well as a more stable part load undervolt. The best of both worlds. The V/F tuning feature is only available on unlocked, 10th Gen and newer, HX and K series processors.
Wow that is completely amazing! I'm going to message you!

CPU achieve higher clocks the fewer cores are under load, it makes sense for it to be most unstable under single core benchmarks.
That completely makes sense! I never thought of that until this has been mentioned!

(Update)

I just lowered the Turbo boost for 1 and 2 cores from 5.8 to 5.2 GHz as a fast tweak and that seemed
to have resolved the single core loads issue! I'm impressed, but I need to do further testing.

What's more, I think I'll be able to drop even lower the undervolt! I'm gonna play with all this
more in the next hours.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Messages
1,137 (0.71/day)
System Name Gamey #1 / #3
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D / Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Motherboard Asrock B450M P4 / MSi B450 ProVDH M
Cooling IDCool SE-226-XT / IDCool SE-224-XTS
Memory 32GB 3200 CL16 / 16GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) PColor 6800 XT / GByte RTX 3070
Storage 4TB Team MP34 / 2TB WD SN570
Display(s) LG 32GK650F 1440p 144Hz VA
Case Corsair 4000Air / TT Versa H18
Audio Device(s) Dragonfly Black
Power Supply EVGA 650 G3 / EVGA BQ 500
Mouse JSCO JNL-101k Noiseless
Keyboard Steelseries Apex 3 TKL
Software Win 10, Throttlestop
Laptops are designed to be used as is. Dont touch the voltages or the frequencies on your Lenovo Legion 7i, leave everything by default and use a cooling resting plate for heavy work or gaming so it doesn't overheat.

It wont last longer because you undervolt it, neither will it perform better (you might get ~1% perf increase after tweaking for countless hours, which will be unnoticeable in your daily usage). Save yourself the trouble and just use default settings.

You can replace the stock thermal paste for a high end one if you suspect the stock one is of poor quality to optimize the cooling but that's about it.

I disagree, a CPU is a CPU no matter where it's installed. Maybe because I often end up with lower end laptops or Mini PCs, but every laptop CPU gets undervolted to run cooler. If nothing else, it results in less fan noise under load which is always welcome and the primary intent.

Also: Undervolting is fun!
 
Low quality post by N3utro
Joined
Oct 18, 2017
Messages
186 (0.07/day)
System Name 1080p 144hz
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E crosshair hero
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory G.skill flare X5 2*16 GB DDR5 6000 Mhz CL30
Video Card(s) Nvidia RTX 4070 FE
Storage Western digital SN850 1 TB NVME
Display(s) Asus PG248Q
Case Phanteks P600S
Audio Device(s) Logitech pro X2 lightspeed
Power Supply EVGA 1200 P2
Mouse Logitech G PRO
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 11 24H2
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/sw/1143551
@N3utro

Your reply and personal opinions about undervolting have nothing to do with the original question that was asked in this thread. Anyone with a hot running laptop can decide for themselves what they want to do about the problem.

So by your logic if someone asks how to set their chip voltage to 3V nobody should give their opinion about doing such a thing and we should only answer providing technical details on how to do it?

If you dont agree with my arguments it doesn't mean they are not relevant to this topic.

Anyway i didn't come here to start a fight, i've made my point even if some of you dont agree, OP can decide what's the best course of action indeed.
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2019
Messages
29 (0.01/day)
(Update)

I just lowered the Turbo boost for 1 and 2 cores from 5.8 to 5.2 GHz as a fast tweak and that seemed
to have resolved the single core loads issue! I'm impressed, but I need to do further testing.

What's more, I think I'll be able to drop even lower the undervolt! I'm gonna play with all this
more in the next hours.
I recommend setting 1 and 2 core to 5.4 or 5.5 (setting it to 5.2 is on the low side).

Also should tweak the values for the other cores as well, I don't believe any laptop can actually do 5.2 all core (ie. 8 cores), so instead of letting it keep hitting the power limit wall and throttling, it's better to set it to 4.7 to 4.9. Once you run R23 you can see your PKG Power and the FID multipliers on the main screen and you will see if your cores are actually reaching the multipliers you set. If not that means the power isn't enough to sustain them and you should lower it.

You can take a look at my guide. Others have already had very good results.
1733342688116.png
 
Joined
May 6, 2023
Messages
128 (0.22/day)
System Name Precision 7540
Processor i9-9980HK
Memory 4x16GB HyperX Impact 2666MHz CL15
Video Card(s) RTX 4000 Max-Q (90W)
Storage 3x1TB XPG SX8200 Pro Gen3x4
Power Supply 240W

freeagent

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
8,619 (3.79/day)
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Processor AMD R7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Thermalright Frozen Edge 360, 3x TL-B12 V2, 2x TL-B12 V1
Memory 2x8 G.Skill Trident Z Royal 3200C14, 2x8GB G.Skill Trident Z Black and White 3200 C14
Video Card(s) Zotac 4070 Ti Trinity OC
Storage WD SN850 1TB, SN850X 2TB, SN770 1TB
Display(s) LG 50UP7100
Case Fractal Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) JBL Bar 700
Power Supply Seasonic Vertex GX-1000, Monster HDP1800
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G213
VR HMD Oculus 3
Software Yes
Benchmark Scores Yes
Sounds kinda like running AMD.. gotta push power for both single and multi core loads
 
Top