Hello
I'm doing some advanced troubleshooting and configuration of an unrelated network device which I'll be connecting to a seconary router via WiFi, but I don't want that device to be connected to the internet initially because it disrupts the troubleshooting.
My PC1 has two network ports. NIC1 is Intel Gigiabit, NIC2 is Realtek 2.5 Gigabit
PC1 currently uses a quick relatively unconfigured Windows 10 installation (I could boot into one of my linuxes, but for now I want to try a windows-only app during troubleshooting)
I have the primary Router 1 normally connected to PC1
I have Router 1 connected to Router 2 and Router 2 is configured on a different subnet for this exact purpose to work as a secondary one.
Router1 LAN is plugged in PC1-NIC1
I want to control the secondary router and the tools installed on the router from my PC1, so I plug in Router 2 LAN into PC1-NIC2
I don't want PC1 to deal with WAN over Router2, only LAN control stuff, PC1 should continue to use Router1 for WAN normally.
I have blocked WAN access in Router2 for PC1, so PC1 shouldn't be able to connect to Router1's LAN via Router2, Router1 configuration remains unchanged.
To repeat, Router2's WAN is a LAN address given by DHCP from Router 1.
Windows 10 or who, for some reason switches by default to regard the Router2 as the only WAN source, which causes loss of internet connectivity for PC1.
Despite both networks connected and both LANs working without an issue, I'm able to control both Routers, it doesn't see WAN over Router1 anymore.
I'm not that big of an network enthusiast to immediately know why this is so or where the responsibility of setting the priority and behavior up is.
Perhaps is some kind of a static routes things, and a side-effect of both networks leading to the same LAN and then actual ISP WAN.
Doesn't mean necessairly I need this kind of a setup, if someone has a better idea I'm open.
The obvious other alternative is to connect to Router2 via it's WAN IP but I'd have to setup WAN administration access and open a potential security gap, however for the limited time I probably don't have to be that concerned, and given that Router1's firewall is in the way it probably would block anyone trying to get direct link with Router2 but I don't want to speculate or make up conclusions about networking.
I'm doing some advanced troubleshooting and configuration of an unrelated network device which I'll be connecting to a seconary router via WiFi, but I don't want that device to be connected to the internet initially because it disrupts the troubleshooting.
My PC1 has two network ports. NIC1 is Intel Gigiabit, NIC2 is Realtek 2.5 Gigabit
PC1 currently uses a quick relatively unconfigured Windows 10 installation (I could boot into one of my linuxes, but for now I want to try a windows-only app during troubleshooting)
I have the primary Router 1 normally connected to PC1
I have Router 1 connected to Router 2 and Router 2 is configured on a different subnet for this exact purpose to work as a secondary one.
Router1 LAN is plugged in PC1-NIC1
I want to control the secondary router and the tools installed on the router from my PC1, so I plug in Router 2 LAN into PC1-NIC2
I don't want PC1 to deal with WAN over Router2, only LAN control stuff, PC1 should continue to use Router1 for WAN normally.
I have blocked WAN access in Router2 for PC1, so PC1 shouldn't be able to connect to Router1's LAN via Router2, Router1 configuration remains unchanged.
To repeat, Router2's WAN is a LAN address given by DHCP from Router 1.
Windows 10 or who, for some reason switches by default to regard the Router2 as the only WAN source, which causes loss of internet connectivity for PC1.
Despite both networks connected and both LANs working without an issue, I'm able to control both Routers, it doesn't see WAN over Router1 anymore.
I'm not that big of an network enthusiast to immediately know why this is so or where the responsibility of setting the priority and behavior up is.
Perhaps is some kind of a static routes things, and a side-effect of both networks leading to the same LAN and then actual ISP WAN.
Doesn't mean necessairly I need this kind of a setup, if someone has a better idea I'm open.
The obvious other alternative is to connect to Router2 via it's WAN IP but I'd have to setup WAN administration access and open a potential security gap, however for the limited time I probably don't have to be that concerned, and given that Router1's firewall is in the way it probably would block anyone trying to get direct link with Router2 but I don't want to speculate or make up conclusions about networking.