• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

666W VBios 4090 for Science

Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
788 (0.15/day)
Location
Kami's Lookout
System Name Desktop
Processor AMD Ryzen 9950X
Motherboard MSI X670E MEG ACE
Cooling Corsair XC7 Block / Corsair XG7 Block EK 360PE Radiator EK 120XE Radiator 8x EK Vadar Furious Fans
Memory 64GB TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Gaming X Trio
Storage 1TB WD Black SN850 / 4TB Inland Premium / 8TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) Alienware AW3821DW / ASUS TUF VG279QM
Case Lian-Li Dynamic 011 XL ROG
Audio Device(s) Razer Nommo Pro Speakers / Razer Kraken Pro V4
Power Supply EVGA P2 1200W Platinum
Mouse Razer Viper
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Elite
Sooo I decided to mess around with the Galax 666W VBios for the 4090 last night.

Backed up my current one and then flashed.

I was happily surprised that I was able to pull that much power through my 3-pin to 12VHPWR cable.

Though I would admit it didn't do anything other than make the card run hotter than it was before. Maybe 1-2% increase in performance for 25%+ power increase...

On my stock VBios, I would occasionally see 400W and my core clock would be between 2950-3025Mhz full boost... With the Galax VBios I could get get up to 3075-3125Mhz... but it was pulling 600W-650W.

The temperatures were drastically different.... my 10C delta between core and hotspot (typically 55C-65C, respectively) shot up to a 20C delta (75C-95C) when using the Galax VBios....

Yeah, it definitely isn't worth it, and I put my stock VBios back in place. I also watched a couple YouTube videos for the giggles to compare.

Please.... my fellow 4090 owners.... Just leave it alone, it isn't worth the extra heat and wear on the card. Use the Nvidia/MSI OC Scanner and enjoy...
 
Sooo I decided to mess around with the Galax 666W VBios for the 4090 last night.

Backed up my current one and then flashed.

I was happily surprised that I was able to pull that much power through my 3-pin to 12VHPWR cable.

Though I would admit it didn't do anything other than make the card run hotter than it was before. Maybe 1-2% increase in performance for 25%+ power increase...

On my stock VBios, I would occasionally see 400W and my core clock would be between 2950-3025Mhz full boost... With the Galax VBios I could get get up to 3075-3125Mhz... but it was pulling 600W-650W.

The temperatures were drastically different.... my 10C delta between core and hotspot (typically 55C-65C, respectively) shot up to a 20C delta (75C-95C) when using the Galax VBios....

Yeah, it definitely isn't worth it, and I put my stock VBios back in place. I also watched a couple YouTube videos for the giggles to compare.

Please.... my fellow 4090 owners.... Just leave it alone, it isn't worth the extra heat and wear on the card. Use the Nvidia/MSI OC Scanner and enjoy...
Hey put your stock bios back on and gpu-z screenshot it, i want to see a few details of it.

666w is like co2 or ln2 territory
 
Well yeah, Galax GPUs are usually binned specifically for their cards higher tier. I'd expect no less from it :)
 
@eidairaman1 Here you go

1736567902165.png
 
Yeah i found 2 of your files in the collection 480W is your max, pg 139 sku 330 is the board part number, you can always try the liquid cooled msi card bios in the 4090 range which has like a max of 520W.

And thank you for being logical about this, many do a flash and then wonder why their fans run faster or the card starts throttling to try and not go super nova
 
Last edited:
Sooo I decided to mess around with the Galax 666W VBios for the 4090 last night.

Backed up my current one and then flashed.

I was happily surprised that I was able to pull that much power through my 3-pin to 12VHPWR cable.

Though I would admit it didn't do anything other than make the card run hotter than it was before. Maybe 1-2% increase in performance for 25%+ power increase...

On my stock VBios, I would occasionally see 400W and my core clock would be between 2950-3025Mhz full boost... With the Galax VBios I could get get up to 3075-3125Mhz... but it was pulling 600W-650W.

The temperatures were drastically different.... my 10C delta between core and hotspot (typically 55C-65C, respectively) shot up to a 20C delta (75C-95C) when using the Galax VBios....

Yeah, it definitely isn't worth it, and I put my stock VBios back in place. I also watched a couple YouTube videos for the giggles to compare.

Please.... my fellow 4090 owners.... Just leave it alone, it isn't worth the extra heat and wear on the card. Use the Nvidia/MSI OC Scanner and enjoy...

I flashed mine back after playing with the galax bios, even ran the release 600w bios instead of the patched (post release updated) bios for my card (530w) for awhile. just wasnt worth tbh. now im sitting on post release vbios; just wasnt worth it.
 
Yea there is a point with processors that you need many double digit % in power to get single digit boosts.
 
1736574833794.png

1736574893542.png

10 FPS for +60% wattage. This overclocking is not worth it anymore no matter the brand, the make, anything. Enjoy your mighty GPU!
 
There is a point of diminishing returns with overclocking
 
@neurotix has a story to tell about doing this
 
Undervolt and overclock with these cards seems to be the best way to go
 
I don't even touch the voltage on my GPU's, I just give it all the boost and mem speed that it will take before becoming unreliable.
 
Back
Top