I noted that copying disks in the 5-disk USB box is slower than putting one disk in a discrete USB box. It seems that USB performance is as much of a bottleneck as it is downloading all the games I own to a collection of hard disks.
My laptop mostly have 2TB M.2 but my Latititude 5440 only has 1TB. 12TB and 16TB disks can hold more games. Steam can move games here and there so for some rigs with dual M.2 slots this is convenient.
Given the sluggish USB performance I figure I will still need a couple of single disk boxes when I want to move files around as this approach is 2-5x faster.
I have questioned USB performance with Intel and Dell/Lenovo to figure out how bad even 13th gen Intel is.
USB is generally not 'choice' interface for program/games storage. Lots of smaller transactions tend to saturate the interface (esp. the lower bandwidth specifications).
Semi-related: Speaking from experience on AMD A320+R5 4600G, 2.4Ghz wifi and USB3 still somwhat interfere with eachother. I'm not sure if that's part of the performance not meeting expectations, or not...
Your laptop appears to have 2x Thunderbolt gen4 ports, in addition to the USB 3.2 Gen1 (~5gbps) ports. However, the
ORICO box you depicted, is also limited to USB 3.0 (5gbps) speeds.
You might want to keep an eye out for a similar "Thunderbolt" multi-disk enclosure/dock (used).
Even an old Thunderbolt (gen1/2)
box using mDP PHY, adapted to USB-C PHY, would
greatly outperform the USB 5gbps
box you have now.
Looking towards new solutions, anything "USB4", "USB 4.0", or "Thunderbolt" is also compatible with your Thunderbolt 4 ports.