Could you people help me out a little, since you seem to know a lot more about these PCB's, build quality etc. Thought the card did look pretty OK when reading the review, but these comments made me really doubt overall quality of the card. Does I/O shield weight transfer mean it's not mounted anywhere to the cooler, as there are no other screwes besides top of the connection ports?
I'm trying to compare this, Aorus version and MSI Gaming Trio, but only did find one review about Aorus Master version. None about the Gaming Trio, naturally seems like MSI is promoting the Vanguard now as a new product line.
Can any of you spot is the quality of Aorus better regarding these shortcomings that Gaming version has?
Review is not on par with TechPowerUp version, but I don't know exactly what to look, and even less with the pictures that are available.
Análisis de la AORUS RTX 5080 MASTER 16G con disipador WINDFORCE 3X, pantalla LCD, y GPU potenciada con más de 3000 MHz de boost
www.profesionalreview.com
Price difference is minimal here between both, so can just opt for more expensive one if that is clearly a better one.
The only interesting thing is the 450W powerlimit.
It does have some, but it is by pressing the IO plate against the shroud.
Wasn't Gigabyte the manufactorer with the most tears in the PCB? Bad weight management and cutout on the PCIe slot.
I would assume the Aorus has same powerlimit(?), would be certainly weird if the supposed better model didn't have it.
These 3 models (MSI Gaming Trio, Gigabyte Gaming and Aorus) are all about in the same price. ~+70€ differences, so nothing basically as the card is expensive and overpriced af anyway, so doesn't matter that much.