Post your Monster Hunter Wilds benchmark scores

[AVATARAT]

9700x PBO
2x32GB DDR5@6200
RTX 4080 Super

2k DLSS

2k Native:

 

[Kozary]

Bench in 1280x720 with lowest preset and post your score as well as a brief description of your overclock. NO FRAME GEN after you disable frame gen your preset might say custom this is fine. I'll try keep an updated results table in the first post

Results table:
9800X3D RTX 5090 - 154.68fps
7800X3D -30 CO 7900XTX -150fps
14900k 5.8ghz RTX 3090 -147fps
7800X3D -20co RX 7900 GRE - 144fps
5800X3D -30 CO RX 6800XT - 139fps (potentially using frame gen results too high)
13900HX RTX4080 - 122fps
10850k 5ghz RTX3090 - 111fps
6950x 4.5ghz RTX2080ti - 101fps





cpu- x99 6950x @4.5ghz
ram- 3333 13-15-13-28 1t
Gpu usage hitting over 95% probably bottle necked.

10850k 5ghz
4000mhz 17-21-21-39 2t dual rank

In this bench this CPU is 10% faster then my x99 system but realistically it is 20% faster in other game benching i have done. Shame on Intel for having the same game IPC for 4 years.

 

[papericeheart]

GPU bottle necked very serious

13900HX 5.2G
6600 28 37 37 29

 

[Red86]

Stock clocks
6000 28 36 36 76

 

[BlaezaLite]

7800X3D -20CO
Mem@Expo 6000 30 36 36 96

1 thing. By making us use Lowest, frame gen is auto-enabled and deselecting it makes graphics settings show as custom. So yeahhhhhh....

 

[adilazimdegilx]

5800X3D -30 CO, memory at 3733Mhz CL16

 

[adilazimdegilx]

2K - Default Ultra (FSRQ) - No RT - No FG


2K - Ultra (Native) - No RT - No FG


4K - Default Ultra (FSRQ) - No RT - No FG


4K - Ultra (Native) - No RT - No FG

 

[xemoh]

7900 xtx 550w extreme

4k Ultra(fsrQ) preset -NO FG -RT HighCard on Stock Card Settings:


4k Ultra(XESS) preset -NO FG -RT High -Xess instead Stock card settings:


Card OC'd 4k Ultra(fsrQ) preset -NO FG -RT ON HIGH:


Card OC'd 4k Ultra(fsrQ) preset -FG ON -RT ON HIGH



Card OC'd 4k Ultra(fsrQ) preset -NO FG -RT OFF:


Card OC'd 4k Ultra(fsrQ) preset -FG ON -RT OFF:


Was hoping more users would give more information on what settings they were using, which is why I only used ULTRA setting and touched nothing else thus leaving the "ultra" tag on the bench results, I heard there are some things you can still toggle and have the Ultra tag remain, I was too lazy to explore this...
But I set ultra at 4k(which gives fsr on quality for upscaling) and then toggled Raytracing on and off(only on high) an ran the bench, otherwise its very hard to compare without that information, more should post more full information... But yeah, XTX on 550w bios some 7950 on core and upsiren on mem chips, stock heatsink still on air. Really really rips on this game, infact its so strong im expecting 4090 and maybe even 5080 owners call foul play. Then i'll have to record a video I supposed...lol... Mostly this is due to most wrongly believe xtx cant raytrace, this is very very untrue when this kind of Raytracing is used, Pathtracing is much harder on it though and you can see team green pull away.. Though I don't think many 5080 users will be surprised given I've got 3dmark runs in raster that beat all 5080s and my raytraced tests are better than stock 5080 but slower and outside of their top100 by a small bit.

I could run some more if anyone wanted to see, havent done any native stuff yet.. because it changes that tag and anyone could be running anything and post it as whatever.. So I didnt do that....Honestly, I was expecting to have to run 2k but then I decided to check out 4k ultra on RT high and it went good. SO just went ahead and tuned with that resolution.

-x

 

[Kozary]

View attachment 384559

7800X3D -20CO
Mem@Expo 6000 30 36 36 96

1 thing. By making us use Lowest, frame gen is auto-enabled and deselecting it makes graphics settings show as custom. So yeahhhhhh....

Are your results using frame gen? Custom is fine really can't exactly cheat by going any lower settings.


Neither of my systems allow frame gen nor have i ever used it so i did not know it was auto on.

Would that mean the results posted in this thread are all using frame gen? The scores look to be way to low.

 

[yzonker]

Looked like the 3090 is holding me back. Hitting 99% usage in several areas despite 720p lowest. OC'ing the 3090 more helped as well.

58/45/50 8400CL38

 

[DAPUNISHER]

7800X3D -30 CO
Stock Pulse 7900XTX
CL30 6000MT/s
Other game launchers and a browser open.

Looking at the score for the 9800X3D+5090 makes me think that Ryzen CPU overhead bug is still present with the Nvidia drivers.

 

[yzonker]

7800X3D -30 CO
Stock Pulse 7900XTX
CL30 6000MT/s
Other game launchers and a browser open.

View attachment 384670
Looking at the score for the 9800X3D+5090 makes me think that Ryzen CPU overhead bug is still present with the Nvidia drivers.

It's there for everybody. I've seen Intel machines score better with AMD cards too.

 

[QuietBob]

This benchmark is very heavy on the GPU even on the lowest preset, so a faster card will produce more fps. But at least we can compare the same card running on different CPUs, to an extent.

GPU bottlenecked for the whole run sequence in the second scene, with utilization over 95%. System in my profile with a stock MBA card:



GPU bottlenecked in the grassy area in the second scene. OC'd system:

 

[Prime2515102]

4k Low:


4k High:


4k Ultra (it warned, "Using large graphics memory. Serious glitches may occur." but it ran without issue on this 8GB card):

 

[Prime2515102]

No OC

 

[QuietBob]

Default ultra preset, meaning upscaling on quality, no RT or FG. Stock MBA card:

 

[yzonker]

Must be horribly optimized. I'm seeing 99% GPU usage on my 4090 in 720p lowest. LOL

F'ing Nvidia, where's my 5090!!!

60/47/52 8200C38

Probably still GPU bound a little in the grassy area.

 

[rv8000]

9800X3D 104mhz eclk ~5.43ghz 2200 fclk
DDR5 8000

Spoiler: Memory Timings

4080s bonestock

 

[AVATARAT]

Bench in 1280x720 with lowest preset and post your score as well as a brief description of your overclock. NO FRAME GEN after you disable frame gen your preset might say custom this is fine. I'll try keep an updated results table in the first post

Results table:
9800X3D RTX 5090 - 154.68fps
7800X3D -30 CO 7900XTX -150fps
14900k 5.8ghz RTX 3090 -147fps
7800X3D -20co RX 7900 GRE - 144fps
5800X3D -30 CO RX 6800XT - 139fps (potentially using frame gen results too high)
13900HX RTX4080 - 122fps
10850k 5ghz RTX3090 - 111fps
6950x 4.5ghz RTX2080ti - 101fps

CPU bound benchmark - when you set the lowest settings, you become far more CPU bound and just don't test your cards, you test your CPU
*Intel's are better here.

 

[Salty Maud]

My midspec server doesn't feel so good. Glorious (DLSS) upscaled 540p, and FPS still in the 40s in gameplay scenes not staring at sand.

 

[Paramount]

game is heavily CPU bounded ( it really like 3d cache) in lowest setting when using high end GPU

when using 7950x3d with non selective CCDs :

when using X3d CCD :

 

[l1CappYl1]

New system, still in test bench mode. Some tweaking on the GPU. CPU is doing whatever OC the motherboard decided, which cant be much with the ghetto cooler I'm testing on...

 

[yzonker]

What happened to the CPU bench thread for this? Just disappeared.

 

[Paramount]

game is heavily CPU bounded ( it really like 3d cache) in lowest setting when using high end GPU

when using 7950x3d with non selective CCDs :

View attachment 384864

when using X3d CCD :

View attachment 384865

with some background tweaking
BTW ( i am using DDR5 8000MT CL34 with FCLK 2200 )

 

[rv8000]

What happened to the CPU bench thread for this? Just disappeared.

Got merged sadly, seems like mod vendettas.