• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Edges Out RTX 4080 in OpenCL Benchmark

GGforever

Staff
Staff member
Joined
Oct 22, 2024
Messages
164 (1.37/day)
A recently surfaced Geekbench OpenCL listing has revealed the performance improvements that the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is likely to bring to the table, and the numbers sure look promising - that is, coming from the disappointment of the GeForce RTX 5080, which manages roughly 260,000 points in the benchmark, portraying a paltry 8% improvement over its predecessor. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, however, managed an impressive 248,000 points, putting it a substantial 20% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Hilariously enough, the RTX 5080 is merely 4% ahead, making the situation even worse for the somewhat contentious GPU. NVIDIA has claimed similar performance improvements in its marketing material, which does seem quiet plausible.

Of course, an OpenCL benchmark is hardly representative of real-world gaming performance. That being said, there is no denying that raw benchmarks will certainly help buyers temper expectations and make decisions. Previous leaks and speculations have hinted at a roughly 10% improvement over its predecessor in raster performance and up to 15% improvements in ray tracing performance, although the OpenCL listing does indicate the RTX 5070 ti might be capable of a larger generational jump, neck-and-neck with NVIDIA's claims. For those in need of a refresher, the RTX 5070 Ti boasts 8960 CUDA cores paired with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. Like its siblings, the RTX 5070 is also rumored to face "extremely limited" supply at launch. With its official launch less than a week away, we won't have much waiting to do to find out for ourselves.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
23,306 (6.12/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
4%

This must be with some distance the laziest most shitty Nvidia gen ever. At least in Ada every GPU in the stack had a defined position in it and they all beat Ampere on perf/w. Today, you don't even have that, the better half of the stack is just a plain replacement for something you already had.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2019
Messages
24 (0.01/day)
Processor core e-8400
Motherboard asus p45
Memory hynix 2 gb
Video Card(s) gt 9800
Storage samsung 1tb
Display(s) benq
Case Sharkoon VG4-V
Power Supply thermaltake 430w
Mouse a4 tech n708
Keyboard a4 tech
Software windows 8.1
there was a result in blender on 5080 and it was fully confirmed. there is already a result 5070ti - 7521 points
+7% from 4070tis
4080super faster by 11%
closer to 4070tis than 4080
 

Attachments

  • 5070TI-BLENDER.jpg
    5070TI-BLENDER.jpg
    229.4 KB · Views: 24
Joined
May 17, 2021
Messages
3,528 (2.57/day)
Processor Ryzen 5 5700x
Motherboard B550 Elite
Cooling Thermalright Perless Assassin 120 SE
Memory 32GB Fury Beast DDR4 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 3060 ti gaming oc pro
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 1TB, WD SN850x 1TB, plus some random HDDs
Display(s) LG 27gp850 1440p 165Hz 27''
Case Lian Li Lancool II performance
Power Supply MSI 750w
Mouse G502
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,794 (4.01/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Thanks to the dumpster fire situation
SHHHHHHH!
Please don't use the word "fire" in the same sentence as 50-series. 600W down the 12VHPWR uh, I mean the 12V6X2 connector is perfectly fine and not in any way a problem. Everything is fine.

1739487100844.png
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2019
Messages
2,300 (1.14/day)
Location
LV-426
System Name Custom
Processor i9 9900k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 arous master
Cooling corsair h150i
Memory 4x8 3200mhz corsair
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 EX Gamer White OC
Storage 500gb Samsung 970 Evo PLus
Display(s) MSi MAG341CQ
Case Lian Li Pc-011 Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro Wireless
Power Supply 850w Seasonic Focus Platinum
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G110
nvidia now realizes their mistake when they launched the gtx10 series, such a big increase in performance
then came 20 series and their performance over 10 series was rather minimal too.. 30 series had a slightly bigger boost...
i dont think we gonna see another repeat of 10 series perfomance again... kinda like intel's sandy bridge..
 

Tpanon

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2025
Messages
2 (0.17/day)
This must be with some distance the laziest most shitty Nvidia gen ever. At least in Ada every GPU in the stack had a defined position in it and they all beat Ampere on perf/w. Today, you don't even have that

I get that you are disappointed. But let's at least stick to the facts. According to TPUs review the 5080 is the most energy efficient card in the world. So the perf/w comment is perhaps a bit misplaced here.

 
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
500 (0.08/day)
System Name -
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI MEG X570
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 (4x140 push-pull)
Memory 32GB Patriot Steel DDR4 3733 (8GBx4)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4080 X-trio.
Storage Sabrent Rocket-Plus-G 2TB, Crucial P1 1TB, WD 1TB sata.
Display(s) LG Ultragear 34G750 nano-IPS 34" utrawide
Case Define R6
Audio Device(s) Xfi PCIe
Power Supply Fractal Design ION Gold 750W
Mouse Razer DeathAdder V2 Mini.
Keyboard Logitech K120
VR HMD Er no, pointless.
Software Windows 10 22H2
Benchmark Scores Timespy - 24522 | Crystalmark - 7100/6900 Seq. & 84/266 QD1 |
I dont know who this info is supposed to benefit? as its an extreme edge niche case.

For everyone else the 4080 will still be faster than ther 5070ti across the board...
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Messages
41 (0.04/day)
Location
Milan - Italy
System Name Desktop Windows 11 Insider Beta
Processor Intel Core i9-14900
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z790-E WIFI
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO
Memory Corsair Dominator DDR5 32 GB (2x16 GB) 6200MHz C36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Super
Storage Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Cooler Master 5 Mid Tower ATX
Audio Device(s) Sound BlasterX AE-5 Plus
Power Supply Corsair RM1000e Gen5 (2023)
Mouse Corsair Katar Pro XT
Keyboard Corsair K68 RGB
... there is already a result 5070ti - 7521 points
+7% from 4070tis
4080super faster by 11%
closer to 4070tis than 4080

Oh boy, my poor 4070 Ti Super scores 7363 points. No reason to think about a 5070 Ti
 
Joined
May 18, 2022
Messages
34 (0.03/day)
nvidia now realizes their mistake when they launched the gtx10 series, such a big increase in performance
then came 20 series and their performance over 10 series was rather minimal too.. 30 series had a slightly bigger boost...
i dont think we gonna see another repeat of 10 series perfomance again... kinda like intel's sandy bridge..
The big increase in performance came entirely from them skipping 2 process nodes and 16nm being so great it carried them hard.
Pascal(gtx 1000 architecture) had literally 0 IPC improvement over Maxwell(gtx 900 architecture) and the changes were minimal, especially for raster.

The gtx 1000 series were the first rip-off generation, the 1080 is a 60 class card, sold as 80 class and at higher than ever prices(for the time).
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
29,237 (6.88/day)
Pascal(gtx 1000 architecture) had literally 0 IPC improvement over Maxwell(gtx 900 architecture) and the changes were minimal, especially for raster.

The gtx 1000 series were the first rip-off generation, the 1080 is a 60 class card, sold as 80 class and at higher than ever prices(for the time).
There's an old saying where I come from, and you're full of it..
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2024
Messages
68 (1.33/day)
There's an old saying where I come from, and you're full of it..
Is it your job to sh't post attacks on people in this forum? Snide comments and personal attacks are all you even seem to post. I just responded to yet another of your personal attacks on me in another threat a few minutes ago.

I think the mod team should look at you.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
29,237 (6.88/day)
Is it your job to sh't post attacks on people in this forum? Snide comments and personal attacks are all you even seem to post. I just responded to yet another of your personal attacks on me in another threat a few minutes ago.

I think the mod team should look at you.
Stop spewing senseless drivel and people won't call you out on it. Just throwing it out there.

Pascal(gtx 1000 architecture) had literally 0 IPC improvement over Maxwell(gtx 900 architecture) and the changes were minimal, especially for raster.
This was not only incorrect, but blatantly so. It shows your complete ignorance to factual info.
The gtx 1000 series were the first rip-off generation, the 1080 is a 60 class card, sold as 80 class and at higher than ever prices(for the time).
As does this. The GTX1000 series GPUs are very, very nearly universally praised for the excellent performance and value NVidia brought to the table. Only silly people, with little grip on reality, disagree.

So, you were saying?

I think the mod team should look at you.
Right back at you. Yes, yes.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,725 (1.78/day)
4%

This must be with some distance the laziest most shitty Nvidia gen ever. At least in Ada every GPU in the stack had a defined position in it and they all beat Ampere on perf/w. Today, you don't even have that, the better half of the stack is just a plain replacement for something you already had.
From Toms ~
Now imagine if they could do this in Japan, then for the rest of the world o_O
 
  • Like
Reactions: vgm
Joined
May 18, 2022
Messages
34 (0.03/day)
Stop spewing senseless drivel and people won't call you out on it. Just throwing it out there.


This was not only incorrect, but blatantly so. It shows your complete ignorance to factual info.

As does this. The GTX1000 series GPUs are very, very nearly universally praised for the excellent performance and value NVidia brought to the table. Only silly people, with little grip on reality, disagree.

So, you were saying?


Right back at you. Yes, yes.
Ah yes they skipped 2 process nodes(22nm and 20nm) and then they sold you a 60 class GPU for 600-700$ (FE)MSRP, they called it a gtx 1080, when it was a 1060 and priced it higher than ever before. And the performance is great because again they skipped 2 process nodes. That's like going from the gtx 1000 series on 16nm to the RTX 6000 series, that isn't even out yet, on 3nm and praising how much faster the rtx 6000 series are compared to the 1000 series. Of course they are.

Pascal literally has no IPC improvement over maxwell, the differences are minimal. There are even videos showing the gtx 1050TI vs gtx 950 which have the same specs, just different clock speeds, because 16nm was a lot better than 28nm, when clocked at the same core and memory clock they perform identical.

The gtx 1000 series were carried by 16nm and they literally did what they have been doing with the rtx 4000 and 5000 series.
 
Top