You didn’t address that your own source says it’s a reference card. I wonder why?
Anyway, buh-bye.
It says it's a reference
PCB. Your source for the dell card doesn't eve state that. Not a reference
CARD wich is the Founders Edition.
I'm sorry, but I gotta call you out on this. Pathtracing and high resolution textures on such a lightweight system... just isn't viable, even if it had 3 times as much VRAM. An R5 9600X+4070S system is pretty much the definition of midrange. It's just good enough to give you a taste of next-gen, while being utterly incapable of keeping up with workloads such as that game.
That is exactly why no one should buy a 12 gb midrange card because it's "better at raytracing". Texture are super light on the core for a huge improvement on visual fidelity, as long as Vram is avaiable. Lack of Vram can show as awful 1% lows AND/OR lack of textures displayed wich is very hard to notice when the reviewer are just benchmarking to get the numbers out.
Rdna2 was very good at launch around 2020/21 imo, but it's aging really, really poorly due to underwhelming rt and lack of AI hardware to support FSR4. Vram won't save a card is technologically behind.
Oh god,
The whole competing 30xx lineup other than the 3090 is not able to run todays games with the tech you are talking about because they lack vram. That has aged poorly, not rdna2.
Shame that W1zz hasn't included RDNA 2 in the RTX 50 tests, hope he does that for the 9070's. Guru3D has data on most but it's probably not too updated, some of Hilbert's charts over there still have Kepler cards in them, and I can't see that data being too new, unless he's been retesting hardware that far back... his reviews aren't putting them in great light, in some cases like his Witcher 3 tests, placing stuff like 6800 XT below 3070 Ti, even at 4K where the 8 GB is not-so-great
We review and test the MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti VANGUARD SOC 16GB graphics card, built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell architecture, which introduces a range of technical enhancements for both rendering and compute performance.
www.guru3d.com
You realize how old Witcher 3 is, and how little use charts that have no indication on wether the reviewer actually looked at the textures to spot if they are missing are? That is a gigantic concern when talking about low vram cards, as they could even get a slight performance boost because they don't even have to render them. The 2080ti was also going to cost same used as the 6800 new minus taxes, they were basically the same tier for many customers. They are the same price just now on the used market, but the rdna card has 16gb vram.
How would you know, are you sitting on discord listening to your mic feedback?
There are many comparison videos, just google it on youtube - krisp vs broadcast.
Wasn't the nvidia broadcast feature required? Now you wouldn't even know if you are not using it. The exact opposite of required
can't judge this yet, the sales at the end of the year will show if 9070xt has indeed sold more units than 5080/5070ti, but in order to do so, amd need to start selling the card, unless you want people to buy 7900xtx's that will cost more than 9070xt, perform worse with rt than 9070xt, and lack fsr4.
AMD has stated they will provide FSR4 on RDNA3, just as they did provide ryzen 5800x3d to b350 boards eventually. You are making things up.
)