- Joined
- Apr 1, 2008
- Messages
- 4,661 (0.77/day)
- Location
- Portugal
System Name | HTC's System |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 5800X3D |
Motherboard | Asrock Taichi X370 |
Cooling | NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit |
Memory | G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire Pulse 6600 8 GB |
Storage | 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III |
Display(s) | LG 27UD58 |
Case | Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard |
Power Supply | Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Razer Deathadder Elite |
Software | Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS |
This is what i understood by reading so, if inaccurate, please say so:
Crysis, @ lower FPS (22 or so), is far more playable then other games @ the same FPS. That's a testament to the quality of the engine, when compared to the others.
HOWEVER, if that playability comes @ the expense of needing a 2x better card to run the game @ the same resolution as other games (if your lucky), that's a HUGE drawback.
Look @ this:
VS this:
These show both HD4850 and GTX280 (as well as others): was unable to get this of a HD4870
2 different game engines and look @ the difference in FPS, even with the GTX280 monster!
Crysis, @ lower FPS (22 or so), is far more playable then other games @ the same FPS. That's a testament to the quality of the engine, when compared to the others.
HOWEVER, if that playability comes @ the expense of needing a 2x better card to run the game @ the same resolution as other games (if your lucky), that's a HUGE drawback.
Look @ this:
VS this:
These show both HD4850 and GTX280 (as well as others): was unable to get this of a HD4870
2 different game engines and look @ the difference in FPS, even with the GTX280 monster!