• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Phenom X2 Information Trickles

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,222 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Time draws closer for the Athlon 64 X2 to retire. It has seen its good and bad days, leading Intel versus the Pentium D and trailing it versus the Core 2 Duo. German site Hardware Infos shed light on the primary lineup of the dual-core edition based on the K10 architecture, the Phenom X2. There are no core architectural changes for the Phenom X2, codenamed "Kuma" over the K8, except that like the Phenom X3 and X4, these chips feature 2 MB of L3 cache apart from 512 KB caches per core and the revised HyperTransport interface. The listed models come at a rated TDP of 45W. The first three Kuma chips listed have clock-speeds ranging from 1.90 GHz to 2.30 GHz and have been given model numbers that look confusing to the older PRN system AMD employed, with the top Athlon 64 X2 rated at 6400+. The later releases of the older X2 using the Brisbane core broke away from the older PRN and we saw models such as 4450e, 4850e or 4850b (note the absence of the "+").

The naming of these chips asserts that. For example, the 1.90 GHz Kuma part is named Phenom X2 GE-6400. Going by the performance evaluations of other parts based on the K10 architecture, at 1.90 GHz + the 2 MB L3 cache, this part might not be on par with the Windsor core Athlon 64 X2 6400+. Contradicting earlier reports that AMD would work out Kuma parts on the 45 nm fabrication process, all three Kuma parts reported are based on the 65 nm fab process.

The Phenom X2 GE-6400 has a clock speed of 1.90 GHz, the GE-6500 has a clock speed of 2.10 GHz and the GE-6600 even higher at 2.30 GHz. All parts feature 512 KB of L2 cache per core, a 2 MB L3 cache, HyperTransport 3.0 link speed of 1600 MHz (3200 MT/s) and rated TDP of 45W. Pricing and availability remain to be seen.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kei
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
1,398 (0.23/day)
Location
Hyderabad,India
System Name MSI apache ge62 2qd
Processor intel i7 5700HQ
Memory 12 Gb
Video Card(s) GTX960m
Storage 1TB
Display(s) Dell 24'
Are these 2 core disabled quad cores or some thing else?
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
298 (0.05/day)
Location
Serbia, Nis
System Name Fedora-bluesky
Processor AMD FX 8350
Motherboard Asus 970A Pro Gaming
Cooling Noctua U14S
Memory Kingston 2x8192MB 667MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 960TI
Storage 2 x WD RED 2TB, 64GB SSD
Display(s) Dell 1920x1200 24"
Software Ubuntu, Fedora, Open Source Software...
Propably two cores are disabled...
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.10/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Phenom is a flop, it performs poorly, overclocks like crap, and only worth looking at because of price. AMD needs to move onto something else, the Phenom processors are the Pentium D's of the Quad-Core World.
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
1,958 (0.27/day)
Location
The Kingdom of Norway
Processor Ryzen 5900X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550I AORUS PRO AX 1.1
Cooling Noctua NB-U12A
Memory 2x 32GB Fury DDR4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 7800 XT Hellhound
Storage Kingston FURY Renegade 2TB PCIe 4.0
Display(s) 2x Dell U2412M
Case Phanteks P400A
Audio Device(s) Hifimediy Sabre 9018 USB DAC
Power Supply Corsair AX850 (from 2012)
Software Windows 10?
dont mess with ma phenom bowhahaha
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,490 (0.39/day)
Location
Your house.
System Name Jupiter-2
Processor Intel i3-6100
Motherboard H170I-PLUS D3
Cooling Stock
Memory 8GB Mushkin DDR3L-1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1050ti
Storage 512GB Corsair SSD
Display(s) BENQ 24in
Case Lian Li PC-Q01B Mini ITX
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 450W
Mouse Logitech Trackball
Keyboard Custom bamboo job
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Finished Super PI on legendary mode in only 13 hours.
Phenom is a flop, it performs poorly, overclocks like crap, and only worth looking at because of price. AMD needs to move onto something else, the Phenom processors are the Pentium D's of the Quad-Core World.

Complain complain complain. :shadedshu Do I even need to look to see what brand you're running? :laugh:

1) It's not a flop -- somewhat of a "letdown," yes, but certainly not a flop. The latest Intel offerings are just hard to beat, that's all, but here's a comparison -- just because my Corvette is slower than your Ferrari doesn't mean my Corvette is a "flop."

2) It performs on par with equal-clocked conroe parts -- where's the poor performance? :confused:

3) It overclocks quite well from what I've seen -- or is a 3.4GHz overclock (I've seen tons of examples) from a stock of 2.6 not good enough? Let me remind you that most of the later batches of Q6600's are having trouble getting above 3.2GHz.

4) And the fact that it's worth looking at because of the price is a good thing. :D
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
298 (0.05/day)
Location
Serbia, Nis
System Name Fedora-bluesky
Processor AMD FX 8350
Motherboard Asus 970A Pro Gaming
Cooling Noctua U14S
Memory Kingston 2x8192MB 667MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 960TI
Storage 2 x WD RED 2TB, 64GB SSD
Display(s) Dell 1920x1200 24"
Software Ubuntu, Fedora, Open Source Software...
I agree with you mdm-adph ;)
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
7,662 (1.20/day)
Location
c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Processor C2Q6600 @ 1.6 GHz
Motherboard Anus PQ5
Cooling ACFPro
Memory GEiL2 x 1 GB PC2 6400
Video Card(s) MSi 4830 (RIP)
Storage Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320 GB Perpendicular Recording
Display(s) Dell 17'
Case El Cheepo
Audio Device(s) 7.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software MCE2K5
based on the current market standard teh phenom is a letdown
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,221 (1.08/day)
System Name ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory 2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card(s) HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
Display(s) 2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Audio Device(s) Audigy 2
Software Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation now migrated to W10 with regrets.
Sadly for AMD, the phenom is a letdown phenomenon.

...but the R700 GPUs are ok ;)
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
298 (0.05/day)
Location
Serbia, Nis
System Name Fedora-bluesky
Processor AMD FX 8350
Motherboard Asus 970A Pro Gaming
Cooling Noctua U14S
Memory Kingston 2x8192MB 667MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 960TI
Storage 2 x WD RED 2TB, 64GB SSD
Display(s) Dell 1920x1200 24"
Software Ubuntu, Fedora, Open Source Software...
There are no core architectural changes for the Phenom X2, codenamed "Kuma" over the K8...
...so there is no core architectural changes for the Phenom X4 either?

lemonade, how come you have so many stars? :D
 
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
3,935 (0.65/day)
Location
West Chester, OH
Phenom is a flop, it performs poorly, overclocks like crap, and only worth looking at because of price. AMD needs to move onto something else, the Phenom processors are the Pentium D's of the Quad-Core World.

:rolleyes:
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
4,378 (0.67/day)
Location
Hurst, Texas
System Name The86
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard ASROCKS B450 Steel Legend
Cooling AMD Stealth
Memory 2x8gb DDR4 3200 Corsair
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3060 Ti
Storage WD Black 512gb, WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) AOC 24in
Case Raidmax Alpha Prime
Power Supply 700W Thermaltake Smart
Mouse Logitech Mx510
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow 2012
Software Windows 10 Professional
the phenom isn't a let down, for its price/preformance its great, quad and triple are super cheap because of AMD.
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
1,398 (0.23/day)
Location
Hyderabad,India
System Name MSI apache ge62 2qd
Processor intel i7 5700HQ
Memory 12 Gb
Video Card(s) GTX960m
Storage 1TB
Display(s) Dell 24'
and don't forget the great IGP platfrom it can be coupled with.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.10/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Complain complain complain. :shadedshu Do I even need to look to see what brand you're running? :laugh:

Look at rig3 and prepare to be amazed!:slap:

1) It's not a flop -- somewhat of a "letdown," yes, but certainly not a flop. The latest Intel offerings are just hard to beat, that's all, but here's a comparison -- just because my Corvette is slower than your Ferrari doesn't mean my Corvette is a "flop."

After the insanely huge hype over the K10 architecture, yes I would put it in the category of flop. The Corvette wasn't touted and hyped up to be a Ferrari killer and then released only to perform worse.

2) It performs on par with equal-clocked conroe parts -- where's the poor performance? :confused:

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/3dmark06-cpu,370.html?p=1275,1308

No, they don't perform on par with equally-clocked Intel parts. Look at the X4 9700@2.4Ghz vs. the Q6600@2.4GHz. I didn't go through every single test they ran, but I looked at most of them, and there wasn't a single one I saw where the Phenom matched or beat the Q6600 at the same clock speed. So I would like a little proof that the Phenom parts are equal to Intel parts clock for clock.

Even if, and that is a big if at this point, they were equal clock for clock, due to Phenom's poor clock speed scaling, we don't see Phenom parts released at nearly the same clock speeds as Intel parts, and they certainly don't reach the same clock speeds when overclocked. The fastest Phenom x4 on the market is 2.6GHz, the fastest Core 2 Duo is 3.2GHz right now.

3) It overclocks quite well from what I've seen -- or is a 3.4GHz overclock (I've seen tons of examples) from a stock of 2.6 not good enough? Let me remind you that most of the later batches of Q6600's are having trouble getting above 3.2GHz.

I've seen very few Phenom X4's get to 3.4GHz, but I don't disagree it is possible. 3.4GHz from 2.6GHz is only 800MHz, just like a Q6600 at 3.2GHz from a stock of 2.4GHz. In the case of the Q6600, going to 3.2GHz from 2.4GHz is actually a better overclock than the X4 going from 2.6GHz to 3.4GHz, even though the final clock speed of the X4 is higher. They both only go up 800MHz. In the case of the Q6600, that is a 33% overclock, and with the X4 it is only a 30% overclock. Granted, not a huge difference, but in terms of percentage over stock(or how much you get for free), even the bad Q6600's were better than the X4's.

Though the Q6600 is old news. Look at something new, the Q6600 has been the focus of attention for long enough. Why not talk about the Q9400? The Q9400's are hitting 3.6GHz and beyond pretty easily.

4) And the fact that it's worth looking at because of the price is a good thing. :D

Yes, price is a good thing. Though if price is your concern, the Q6600 easily has the price market taken. Even the bad batches make it to 3.2GHz, and in the same price range you won't find a Phenom that will match it, both stock and overclocked. I know I said to look away from the Q6600, but it is just so hard!
 
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
3,935 (0.65/day)
Location
West Chester, OH
Look at rig3 and prepare to be amazed!:slap:



After the insanely huge hype over the K10 architecture, yes I would put it in the category of flop. The Corvette wasn't touted and hyped up to be a Ferrari killer and then released only to perform worse.



http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/3dmark06-cpu,370.html?p=1275,1308

No, they don't perform on par with equally-clocked Intel parts. Look at the X4 9700@2.4Ghz vs. the Q6600@2.4GHz. I didn't go through every single test they ran, but I looked at most of them, and there wasn't a single one I saw where the Phenom matched or beat the Q6600 at the same clock speed. So I would like a little proof that the Phenom parts are equal to Intel parts clock for clock.

Even if, and that is a big if at this point, they were equal clock for clock, due to Phenom's poor clock speed scaling, we don't see Phenom parts released at nearly the same clock speeds as Intel parts, and they certainly don't reach the same clock speeds when overclocked. The fastest Phenom x4 on the market is 2.6GHz, the fastest Core 2 Duo is 3.2GHz right now.



I've seen very few Phenom X4's get to 3.4GHz, but I don't disagree it is possible. 3.4GHz from 2.6GHz is only 800MHz, just like a Q6600 at 3.2GHz from a stock of 2.4GHz. In the case of the Q6600, going to 3.2GHz from 2.4GHz is actually a better overclock than the X4 going from 2.6GHz to 3.4GHz, even though the final clock speed of the X4 is higher. They both only go up 800MHz. In the case of the Q6600, that is a 33% overclock, and with the X4 it is only a 30% overclock. Granted, not a huge difference, but in terms of percentage over stock(or how much you get for free), even the bad Q6600's were better than the X4's.

Though the Q6600 is old news. Look at something new, the Q6600 has been the focus of attention for long enough. Why not talk about the Q9400? The Q9400's are hitting 3.6GHz and beyond pretty easily.



Yes, price is a good thing. Though if price is your concern, the Q6600 easily has the price market taken. Even the bad batches make it to 3.2GHz, and in the same price range you won't find a Phenom that will match it, both stock and overclocked. I know I said to look away from the Q6600, but it is just so hard!

.. Thats what she said.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
298 (0.05/day)
Location
Serbia, Nis
System Name Fedora-bluesky
Processor AMD FX 8350
Motherboard Asus 970A Pro Gaming
Cooling Noctua U14S
Memory Kingston 2x8192MB 667MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 960TI
Storage 2 x WD RED 2TB, 64GB SSD
Display(s) Dell 1920x1200 24"
Software Ubuntu, Fedora, Open Source Software...
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/3dmark06-cpu,370.html?p=1275,1308

No, they don't perform on par with equally-clocked Intel parts. Look at the X4 9700@2.4Ghz vs. the Q6600@2.4GHz. I didn't go through every single test they ran, but I looked at most of them, and there wasn't a single one I saw where the Phenom matched or beat the Q6600 at the same clock speed. So I would like a little proof that the Phenom parts are equal to Intel parts clock for clock.

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/premiere-pro-2-0,386.html?p=1275,1308 (less is better)
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/pinnacle-studio-11-plus,385.html?p=1308,1275 (less is better)
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/sisoftware-sandra-xi,396.html?p=1275,1308 (higher is better)
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/mainconcept-h-264-encoder,380.html?p=1275,1308 (less is better)
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/hdtv-playback,377.html?p=1275,1308 (less is better)
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/winrar,402.html?p=1308,1275 (less is better)

...self explained... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,771 (0.94/day)
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name ---
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.00 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0, Hacked Bios F4.x
Cooling Silenx 4 pipe Tower cooler + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 3 x 120mm, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 16GB + Patriot Memory DDR3 1866 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage Inland 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD for OS, WDC Black - 2TB + 1TB Storage, Inland 480GB SSD - Games
Display(s) 3 x 1080P LCDs - Acer 25" + Acer 23" + HP 23"
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/3dmark06-cpu,370.html?p=1275,1308

No, they don't perform on par with equally-clocked Intel parts. Look at the X4 9700@2.4Ghz vs. the Q6600@2.4GHz. I didn't go through every single test they ran, but I looked at most of them, and there wasn't a single one I saw where the Phenom matched or beat the Q6600 at the same clock speed. So I would like a little proof that the Phenom parts are equal to Intel parts clock for clock.

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/mainconcept-h-264-encoder,380.html?p=1308,1275

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/hdtv-playback,377.html?p=1275,1308

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/winrar,402.html?p=1275,1308

:p
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,771 (0.94/day)
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name ---
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.00 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0, Hacked Bios F4.x
Cooling Silenx 4 pipe Tower cooler + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 3 x 120mm, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 16GB + Patriot Memory DDR3 1866 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage Inland 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD for OS, WDC Black - 2TB + 1TB Storage, Inland 480GB SSD - Games
Display(s) 3 x 1080P LCDs - Acer 25" + Acer 23" + HP 23"
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
298 (0.05/day)
Location
Serbia, Nis
System Name Fedora-bluesky
Processor AMD FX 8350
Motherboard Asus 970A Pro Gaming
Cooling Noctua U14S
Memory Kingston 2x8192MB 667MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 960TI
Storage 2 x WD RED 2TB, 64GB SSD
Display(s) Dell 1920x1200 24"
Software Ubuntu, Fedora, Open Source Software...
  • Like
Reactions: Kei

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.10/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,771 (0.94/day)
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name ---
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.00 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0, Hacked Bios F4.x
Cooling Silenx 4 pipe Tower cooler + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 3 x 120mm, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 16GB + Patriot Memory DDR3 1866 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage Inland 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD for OS, WDC Black - 2TB + 1TB Storage, Inland 480GB SSD - Games
Display(s) 3 x 1080P LCDs - Acer 25" + Acer 23" + HP 23"
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
298 (0.05/day)
Location
Serbia, Nis
System Name Fedora-bluesky
Processor AMD FX 8350
Motherboard Asus 970A Pro Gaming
Cooling Noctua U14S
Memory Kingston 2x8192MB 667MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 960TI
Storage 2 x WD RED 2TB, 64GB SSD
Display(s) Dell 1920x1200 24"
Software Ubuntu, Fedora, Open Source Software...
Nevertheless, E8400 @ stock beats the crap out of Q6600 and 9850 with current software. Maybe, in time, when software catches up with multithreading the performance lead will change in favor to quads.

Ok, so you managed to find 4 out of ~35 tests that the Phenom performs better in than the Q6600, and 1 of those tests is a synthetic memory benchmark that has no real world application or benefit.

you said:
and there wasn't a single one I saw where the Phenom matched or beat the Q6600 at the same clock speed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kei

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.10/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Nevertheless, E8400 @ stock beats the crap out of Q6600 and 9850 with current software. Maybe, in time, when software catches up with multithreading the performance lead will change in favor to quads.



you said:

Not with all current software, just with software not optimized for multiple cores, there is software out there that benefits from 4 cores, but for the common user, a dual core is a better choice, I agree.

And the key there was, "I saw" I don't have the time to look through all 35 test, especially with Tom's slow load times. Appearently there are 4 tests where the Phenom matches or outperforms the Q6600, big deal. That certainly doesn't validate the statement that the Phenom/K10 architecture performs equally to Intel's Core 2 architecture clock for clock.
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,812 (1.61/day)
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Pandemic 2020
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 "Gen 2" 2600X
Motherboard AsRock X470 Killer Promontory
Cooling CoolerMaster 240 RGB Master Cooler (Newegg Eggxpert)
Memory 32 GB Geil EVO Portenza DDR4 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS Radeon RX 580 DirectX 12 DUAL-RX580-O8G 8GB 256-Bit GDDR5 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video C
Storage WD 250 M.2, Corsair P500 M.2, OCZ Trion 500, WD Black 1TB, Assorted others.
Display(s) ASUS MG24UQ Gaming Monitor - 23.6" 4K UHD (3840x2160) , IPS, Adaptive Sync, DisplayWidget
Case Fractal Define R6 C
Audio Device(s) Realtek 5.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RMX 850 Platinum PSU (Newegg Eggxpert)
Mouse Razer Death Adder
Keyboard Corsair K95 Mechanical & Corsair K65 Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Key here is Newtekie1, as much as I like you, you are pro Intel and nvidia. You do bi*** and moan about alot of things. Granted alot of stuff you do moan and gripe about has substance. I saw at least 8 tests they pointed out where the phenom was better, which you asked for. Now that its shown, you gripe and moan about that. bad form man, its just bad form.

right now intel is better, we dont dispute that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kei

Kei

Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
2,179 (0.36/day)
System Name ...no name yet
Processor AMD Ryzen 7800x3D
Motherboard ASUS STRIX X670E-E Wi-Fi
Cooling EK Nucleus AIO CR360 Lux-D-RGB
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws DDR5 6000Mhz CL36 32GB (2x16)
Video Card(s) MSI 4090 Gaming Trio
Storage 1Tb Samsung 860 SSD, twin 2TB Samsung nvme drives
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG279Q IPS gsync 2k
Case Thermaltake P5 wall mounted and backlit with Corsair lighting node pro
Power Supply EVGA P3 1000w
Mouse Logitech G9x (awesome!)
Keyboard Logitech G105
VR HMD Pimax 5k+
Software Windows 10 64Bit
Benchmark Scores CPU-Z 698s/7465m (7800x3D result)
Propably two cores are disabled...



More than likely these will be like the X3's with whatever cores not needed being disabled. The performance will be very good from these models as you don't have to wait to see how they perform since I've been using these 'exact' things for quite a while now. When you downcore a Phenom X4 it then for all intents and purposes becomes either an X3 Toliman or X2 Kuma.

See attatched screenshots and you'll see what I mean about that. The power consumption is fantastic with these setups as they don't take very much voltage to run at all. Then again the energy performance from the X4 lineup is awesome as well IF you know what you're doing as they don't need the voltage they come with stock to actually run at those speeds, they're overvolted by a healthy amount. Knock that down and the temps and power consumption fall like a rock.

On my low power setting I'm running my Phenom 9850BE at 1.8Ghz which is MORE than enough speed to do anything (including play games with no lag at 60fps for almost anything) and I only need a ridiculously low 0.912v to do so. If people call that bad power consumption performance they must be using calculators to make their posts...

Even running at stock speed of 2.5Ghz I only need 1.072v which is nothing. I don't use H20 cooling or anything like that, I'm on air cooling all the time mounted inside a full tower case. My fan stays on silent mode at ALL times no matter the load and still never reaches a temp that even makes me care. Fan speed max is 2000+rpm (110cfm) yet as you see in the pics I don't even need half of that to get my system to run cool and not make a peep. The CPU fan is listed at the bottom of the list as Scythe110 (the other is my Scythe 40cfm side fan...which is more than what the cpu fan is doing).

These X2 Kuma's will be sweet indeed especially if they offer a black edition model. Either way it'll be sweet if they still decide to go with it.

K


(No offense, but Newtekie1 please don't reply to this, thank you :))
 

Attachments

  • 2900 1136v.jpg
    2900 1136v.jpg
    43.1 KB · Views: 439
  • Everest 2.jpg
    Everest 2.jpg
    43.1 KB · Views: 440
  • WOW.jpg
    WOW.jpg
    206 KB · Views: 453
  • stock wow.jpg
    stock wow.jpg
    205.6 KB · Views: 478
Top