- Joined
- Jul 30, 2007
- Messages
- 6,560 (1.04/day)
System Name | Vintage |
---|---|
Processor | i7 - 3770K @ Stock |
Cooling | Scythe Zipang II |
Memory | 2x4GB Crucial DDR3 |
Video Card(s) | MSI GTX970 |
Storage | M4 124GB SSD// WD Black 640GB// WD Black 1TB//Samsung F3 1.5TB |
Display(s) | Samsung SM223BW 21.6" |
Case | Generic |
Power Supply | Corsair HX 520W |
Software | Windows 7 |
OK, I read the first couple of pages of responses to the original post, then I got tired of the moronic logic...
So, this might have already been covered, but it's always good to reiterate a nice point (if it has):
We have a piece of information, regarding possible BD FX cpu pricing.
We have no definitive information regarding this pricing; as to whether it is accurate (or will become inaccurate).
We do not have information that tells us that this pricing is tied to performance parallels with Intel cpus.
What we can't say:
"Oh no, BD is slower than Intel's mid-range",
"Oh wow, BD is faster than Intel's mid-range"
"The pricing is telling us that these cpus will be slow"
What we can say:
"Perhaps AMD is anticipating Intel's price dropping, and wants to establish competitive pricing."
"Perhaps the surprisingly low prices reflect AMD's wish to steal market share from Intel (i.e. sway people away from i5 and i7 cpus for their new builds)"
"Perhaps AMD is anticipating the release of Ivy Bridge and the inevitable price drops on the 2nd gen i5 and i7 cpus."
"We don't know if those prices are set in stone, especially since they will cause some major ripples across the net, possibly causing AMD to make changes (if they are official prices, that is)."
"We can definitively say, at this point, that we have absolutely no idea how these BD processors (in their 'ready for prime time' iteration) compare to their Intel counterparts on the various and innumerable benchmarks available."
...:shadedshu
Please stay.