NVIDIA Releases GeForce 358.50 WHQL Game Ready Driver

[DeadSkull]

So, a stock 980ti is 2 fps slower than a Fury X at 4K on an engine from a company that worked with AMD? How is this slow? This is what you'd expect is it not? A £550-£600 gfx card made from Unobtainium is a fraction faster than a £530 (stock version) card*. As for the rest of the stack - go figure, it's DICE. No surprises above. FTR mind you, most 980ti's run way faster than the stock tested benchmarks.

*offers not included.

Why are you surprised....FuryX rocks at resolutions higher then 1080p when the game isn't loaded with Nvidia hairworks junk.

 

[rtwjunkie]

Why are you surprised....FuryX rocks at resolutions higher then 1080p when the game isn't loaded with Nvidia hairworks junk.

I think you misunderstood. He is surprised that people are surprised that 980Ti is only 2 fps slower than Fury X in an AMD oriented game benchmark.

His point is that the 980Ti is super powerful, and it SHOULD BE where it is on the benchmarks, and no one should be surprised.

 

[ZweiGaming]

wasnt there just a big thread about how games wont need more than 8gb ram anytime soon, but why does this game recommended need 16gb ram