Hm, I just went through the review at Anandtech, these cards offer essentially the performance of a Vega56 in gaming (they're weaker in compute) and cost significantly less. And they draw less power. And they have DXR. Yet almost 70% of the visitors voted "too expensive"
kings already summed it up pretty well:
Of course we all want better prices, but... It's funny that a Vega 56 for $350~$400 is considered a great deal, but an RTX 2060 with the same performance for $350 is overpriced!
Internet logic!
More like "AMD fanboy logic". Vega has never been a deal approaching "good" in any way shape or form.
Sapphire announced price reductions on their RX Vega cards, if you can find any.
Hmmm lemme see, which one should I buy... the older, hotter, card that I
literally cannot buy because there is no stock... or the newer card that I can get right now and comes with a free game that I can sell to recover some of the cost?
Tough decision.
And 6GB really isn't enough for cards in the $350 price range.
[citation needed]
I have yet to play a game on my GTX 1070 that uses anywhere NEAR 8GB of VRAM, in fact the highest I think I've seen it go is slightly over 4GB - and I play everything at 1440p. For 4k I imagine 6GB will be more than sufficient, but even so, the RTX 2060 isn't intended to be a 4k card. NVIDIA made absolutely the right call of 6GB VRAM for a mid-range product.
If NVIDIA releases a GDDR5(X) version of the 2060, it will absolutely destroy anything and everything AMD has to offer in terms of both price and performance.