- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,533 (0.36/day)
System Name | Obsolete / Waiting for Zen 5 or Arrow Lake |
---|---|
Processor | i9-9900K @ 5.2 GHz @ 1.35v / No AVX Offset |
Motherboard | AsRock Z390 Taichi |
Cooling | Custom Water |
Memory | 32GB G.Skill @ 4000/CL15 |
Video Card(s) | Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom / Undervolt + OC |
Storage | Samsung 990 Pro 2TB + WD SN850X 1TB + 64TB NAS/Server |
Display(s) | 27" 1440p IPS @ 280 Hz + 77" QD-OLED @ 144 Hz VRR |
Case | Fractal Design Meshify C |
Audio Device(s) | Asus Essence STX / Upgraded Op-Amps |
Power Supply | Corsair RM1000x / Native 12VHPWR |
Mouse | Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight |
Keyboard | Corsair K60 Pro / MX Low Profile Speed |
Software | Windows 10 Pro x64 |
Apparently some people who absolutely have no clue about Image quality or Upscaling really like to denounce DLSS with some kind of jealousy-fueled rant
I mean they somehow think 1080p DLSS look worse than 1080p native here, that somehow heavily aliased image is better because it's sharper...
View attachment 202440
Yeah I think it's because they don't know better, since they have not tried it. Only read about it. My experience with DLSS 2.x has been great but DLSS 1.0 was not great