AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.1 Unveiled with Several Upscaler Changes to Improve Realism

[spnidel]

You're saying you know it all, but it doesn't match what you're posting.

I didn't say I know it all, I said I know what I'm doing and that you sound like you're pretending to know better, so gg pulling out a strawman lol

Its also up to you whether you want to see that or not.

ironic

Your view on what constitutes a proper support period differs wildly from what customers seem to expect.

no, it doesn't, you're just misinterpreting what I'm saying and applying your own meaning to it, so either projecting shit on me, assuming the worst, or strawmanning again

I'm saying you seem to be wearing the wrong glasses and that's why you got your panties in a bunch because someone typed 'abandoned'

yea, abandoned typically comes with negative connotations

And then when the explanation comes, again, you act like you're being attacked.

read your own reply with your agile teachings and implications that I have no idea what I'm doing/talking about and then read what you just wrote here lol; stop gaslighting

It shows also in the wording you're using, as if some battle must be fought here, its even close to insulting

yea I typically get upset when people give devs shit for no reason other than "I want more free shit" - been on the receiving end of this ungrateful attitude after having released tons of updates and it's no fun at all
you could get cheeky and call it a "trigger" and you'd be right

Solid companies are capable of extending support beyond their profit line, because there is more profitable business in the company.

no thanks to patching for the most part

And then the company name can grow out to become a brand you 'trust' because things always work out.

thanks to marketing lol, no one gives a shit about patching unless there's strong marketing behind it to let everyone know how big of a good boy the developer is

They just kept patching and as a result have built incredibly strong franchises.

they have incredibly strong franchises thanks to marketing, not patching. patching is mainly relevant in the initial period of when you have to "prove" that you're a good developer.
comparing metro exodus, a single player game where people sperged out because they couldn't get a game on their favorite digital game distribution platform (which is an infantile and stupid reason btw), to something like blizzard, a company that produces multiplayer titles only in the last 10+ years, is a bad comparison

Continued support is also relevant for communities to stay alive

...are we talking about singleplayer games? sounds like a goalpost move again

which, ultimately, leads to continued support for sequels.

good marketing ultimately leads to sequels, continued support is at the behest of the company leads if they determine it's a worthwhile investment

 

[Vayra86]

I didn't say I know it all, I said I know what I'm doing and that you sound like you're pretending to know better, so gg pulling out a strawman lol

ironic

no, it doesn't, you're just misinterpreting what I'm saying and applying your own meaning to it, so either projecting shit on me, or strawmanning again

yea, abandoned typically comes with negative connotations

read your own reply with your agile teachings and implications that I have no idea what I'm doing/talking about and then read what you just wrote here lol; stop gaslighting

yea I typically get upset when people give devs shit for no reason other than "I want more free shit" - been on the receiving end of this ungrateful attitude after having released tons of updates and it's no fun at all


no thanks to patching for the most part

thanks to marketing lol, no one gives a shit about patching unless there's strong marketing behind it to let everyone know how big of a good boy the developer is

they have incredibly strong franchises thanks to marketing, not patching. patching is mainly relevant in the initial period of when you have to "prove" that you're a good developer.
comparing metro exodus, a single player game where people sperged out because they couldn't get a game on their favorite digital game distribution platform (which is an infantile and stupid reason btw), to something like blizzard, a company that produces multiplayer titles only in the last 10+ years, is a bad comparison

...are we talking about singleplayer games? sounds like a goalpost move again

good marketing ultimately leads to sequels, continued support is at the behest of the company leads if they determine it's a worthwhile investment

Thanks for confirming everything, we're done here, again, you do you, the world is wrong, you're right, we misinterpret everything while you confirm it just once more.

I'll highlight the key point

It shows also in the wording you're using, as if some battle must be fought here, its even close to insulting

yea I typically get upset when people give devs shit for no reason other than "I want more free shit" - been on the receiving end of this ungrateful attitude after having released tons of updates and it's no fun at all

That's it, right there, it echoes in all your posts and its out of place.

 

[spnidel]

Thanks for confirming everything, we're done here, again, you do you, the world is wrong, you're right, we misinterpret everything while you confirm it just once more.

I'll highlight the key point

yea I typically get upset when people give devs shit for no reason other than "I want more free shit" - been on the receiving end of this ungrateful attitude after having released tons of updates and it's no fun at all

That's it, right there, it echoes in all your posts and its out of place.

I accept your concession
p.s. gg on contradicting yourself - you say that I need to consider other views/ideas, yet bail the moment I say you're misinterpreting what I say LOL