- Joined
- May 10, 2020
- Messages
- 738 (0.44/day)
Processor | Intel i7 13900K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus ROG Strix Z690-E Gaming |
Cooling | Arctic Freezer II 360 |
Memory | 32 Gb Kingston Fury Renegade 6400 C32 |
Video Card(s) | PNY RTX 4080 XLR8 OC |
Storage | 1 TB Samsung 970 EVO + 1 TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus + 2 TB Samsung 870 |
Display(s) | Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A + Samsung C24RG50 |
Case | Corsair 5000D Airflow |
Power Supply | EVGA G6 850W |
Mouse | Razer Basilisk |
Keyboard | Razer Huntsman Elite |
Benchmark Scores | 3dMark TimeSpy - 26698 Cinebench R23 2258/40751 |
That’s BS e we knew since the beginning.Or maybe it's time for Intel to pull an AMD move and announce that running a constant 100 °C is intended by design.
Just take a look at X3D CPU’s behavior, where concerns about cache imposed lower voltages and clock speed. High efficiency and low temperatures.
Both Intel and AMD just tried to squeeze every last drop of performance out of their products, for marketing reasons, using high voltage and clock speed. We can have much more efficient CPUs manually adjusting power limits and voltages, “losing” just a few percentage of performance (in some specific tasks).
But you know, they need a longer bar on a comparison graph, to expose during presentations…