- Joined
- Oct 27, 2009
- Messages
- 1,195 (0.22/day)
- Location
- Republic of Texas
System Name | [H]arbringer |
---|---|
Processor | 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores) |
Motherboard | SM GL |
Cooling | 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump. |
Memory | 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb |
Video Card(s) | blah bigadv folder no gfx needed |
Storage | 32GB Sammy SSD |
Display(s) | headless |
Case | Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it) |
Audio Device(s) | yawn |
Power Supply | Antec 1200w HCP |
Software | Ubuntu 10.10 |
Benchmark Scores | http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww |
The good part about Intel's oneAPI is that Level Zero support is technically direct-to-metal access on their GPUs.
AMD does (did?) this with their GCN-based (CDNA now) products through ROCm, but unfortunately not yet for RDNA.
The problem is that AMD does not offer any consumer/prosumer card that can be used for local development (e.g. GPGPU developers using a RTX 3090/4090). The Radeon VII was their pinnacle of success, but unfortunately got hampered by "gaming" reviews.
Eventually they will get there once ROCm is in a good state of support for the RX 7900 XTX and the PRO W7900.
They support single cards of the W7900 7900xtx xt and gre. 2 cards is in beta support. They aren't having trouble till cards 5 and 6. They are simply trying to use things in ways that are unsupported and crying about it.
They made an announcement before partnering with AMD, before qualifying a solution like any competent firm would have. If they want 8 card nodes, they should be using MI210s.