• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Tiny Corp. Pauses Development of AMD Radeon GPU-based Tinybox AI Cluster

Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,150 (0.21/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
The good part about Intel's oneAPI is that Level Zero support is technically direct-to-metal access on their GPUs.

AMD does (did?) this with their GCN-based (CDNA now) products through ROCm, but unfortunately not yet for RDNA.


The problem is that AMD does not offer any consumer/prosumer card that can be used for local development (e.g. GPGPU developers using a RTX 3090/4090). The Radeon VII was their pinnacle of success, but unfortunately got hampered by "gaming" reviews.

Eventually they will get there once ROCm is in a good state of support for the RX 7900 XTX and the PRO W7900.

They support single cards of the W7900 7900xtx xt and gre. 2 cards is in beta support. They aren't having trouble till cards 5 and 6. They are simply trying to use things in ways that are unsupported and crying about it.
They made an announcement before partnering with AMD, before qualifying a solution like any competent firm would have. If they want 8 card nodes, they should be using MI210s.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2018
Messages
504 (0.22/day)
History, would like a word with you (and this thread).

Raja Koduri's Ellesmere-Polaris and (especially) Fury and Vega *started* CDNA/AI-MI compute @ AMD.
To this day, Vega 10 and Vega 20 cards are some of the best 'budget' options for 'tinkering' with LLMs, etc.

He's well-within his (and his team's) rights to have thought that 3rd Generation Navi could be used for such.
Not to mention, he wasn't told that; AMD historically 'likes to see' new uses for their products, and can more-less crowd source off them.

'Consumer Hardware' started the AI/MI revolution.
Vega is retaining support largely because of how similar it is to currently-supported CDNA.

We're only 2generation off from Raja's last pre-CDNA work, Navi 1x. (Navi 12 is something strange...)
I can't blame Hotz for poking @ AMD when, previously they'd been quite accommodating towards this kind of use.
Ex: I received VII air coolers (for a MI25 mod) from a EHW'r that *still* runs quad VIIs for his work.


Quite often, I'm reminded that: Gamers =/= Enthusiasts.
You clearly have no enthusiasm for technology, beyond the FPS and the pretties on the screen...

It’s a consumer GPU, end of story. The startup owner targeted hardware that would maximize their profit, performance, and availability on a consumer “gaming” product not intended for professional work; the brand of GPU is entirely irrelevant.

All this is is poor investment/research on their end in the pursuit of making easy money on the “next big thing”.
 

Cheeseball

Not a Potato
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
1,903 (0.34/day)
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
System Name Titan
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 7950X3D
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X670E-I Gaming WiFi
Cooling ID-COOLING SE-207-XT Slim Snow
Memory TEAMGROUP T-Force Delta RGB 2x16GB DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24 GB GDDR6 (MBA)
Storage 2TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe
Display(s) AOpen Fire Legend 24" (25XV2Q), Dough Spectrum One 27" (Glossy), LG C4 42" (OLED42C4PUA)
Case ASUS Prime AP201 33L White
Audio Device(s) Kanto Audio YU2 and SUB8 Desktop Speakers and Subwoofer, Cloud Alpha Wireless
Power Supply Corsair SF1000L
Mouse Logitech Pro Superlight (White), G303 Shroud Edition
Keyboard Wooting 60HE / NuPhy Air75 v2
VR HMD Occulus Quest 2 128GB
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit 23H2 Build 22631.3447
They support single cards of the W7900 7900xtx xt and gre. 2 cards is in beta support. They aren't having trouble till cards 5 and 6. They are simply trying to use things in ways that are unsupported and crying about it.
They made an announcement before partnering with AMD, before qualifying a solution like any competent firm would have. If they want 8 card nodes, they should be using MI210s.
MI210 is not viable at ~$15,000 each with wholesale pricing (Dell has a deal for it though), which is the point of why he attempted to go with the RX 7900 XTX since they are affordable and will fit the $15,000 target price.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,584 (0.81/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
I won't be surprised when he find the same problem exists in his newly build 4090 box.

James Franco GIF
 
Joined
Apr 9, 2021
Messages
21 (0.02/day)
Location
Los Angeles. California
If Tiny wants to unload thoes 7900XTX's for a deal I'll buy one or two of them. I'm just going to play games and create content. The one I already have is awesome for that. It's almost like AMD designed it just for games and content creation. The drivers needed some work at launch but work great now.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,584 (0.81/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
MI210 is not viable at ~$15,000 each with wholesale pricing (Dell has a deal for it though), which is the point of why he attempted to go with the RX 7900 XTX since they are affordable and will fit the $15,000 target price.
Isn't this the whole point people are trying to say?

If he wants enterprise-class support and development resource, then pay the enterprise price.
If he wants to DIY the whole gap between consumer and enterprise, then hitting a brick wall is as expected.

I would say it is just him underestimated the cost of 'Breaching the gap between consumer and enterprise' at the first place.
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Messages
19 (0.01/day)
System Name Small Joy
Processor Core i7-6700K
Motherboard Asus sabertooth z170 s
Memory TEAMGROUP DDR4 32GB (2x16GB) 3200MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 3080
Storage 4TB WD HDD, 1TB samsung 980
Display(s) AOC 165hz IPS
Case NZXT S340
Power Supply EVGA 750W
Keyboard Corsair k70 M.K2
Man, never thought I would hear geohotz name mentioned in 2024 brings back the good old PS3 jailbreaking times, good times!
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Messages
157 (0.07/day)
“Small startup got burned by jumping into the AI buzz market with consumer GPUs not designed for professional work in an effort to make a quick buck”

Oh no… anyways.
Glad to see this as the first post. I have no idea how anyone who works in a field like this could do anything but shake their head. They announced a vaporware product that goes out of its way to use a consumer hardware option - where an enterprise version is sold instead specifically for the purpose of supporting the application in question. The guy then throws a public fit in the media at the company they wanted to source that consumer hardware from, because it doesn't have the proper enterprise software support.

There's no shame in the idea or that he tried to make it work, but making this public fuss about the consequences of his own silly decision... I remember this guy from many years ago and that I liked him so that's all I'll say. The main selling point was "nobody else cut this corner to lower the price" and there was a real reason why.

Also, not a chance in hell Intel or Nvidia do any more to help. The markup on enterprise cards is the cornerstone of Nvidia's business strategy for crying out loud.
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2019
Messages
873 (0.48/day)
Isn't this the whole point people are trying to say?

If he wants enterprise-class support and development resource, then pay the enterprise price.
If he wants to DIY the whole gap between consumer and enterprise, then hitting a brick wall is as expected.

I would say it is just him underestimated the cost of 'Breaching the gap between consumer and enterprise' at the first place.
Frankly, he's lucky that AMD even bothered to put him in contact with a high level engineer and coding staff; instead of being added to the regular consumer (or at least prosumer) queue, or worse, being told to pound sand and buy their enterprise cards.

He knows full well that NVIDIA WILL tell him to pound sand AND to cease and desist before forcing a driver update that will nerf AI usage for the workloads he's trying to run on their GPUs.

And Intel probably would only help him insofar as it benefits them, which really isn't much as Intel's current priority is AI on everything (but mostly CPUs and dedicated accelerators) and gaming on GPU. Esp. given the massive charm offensive they're doing trying to show that they're not going to abandon gaming GPUs; what with all the regular interviews with GN and others discussing the difficulties and what they're doing to catch up, on top of trying to be the fastest of the 3 GPU makers to release new driver updates for new, big-title games. Sure, there's some money in AI, but Intel would also be better served offering up dedicated enterprise solutions to it than risk unsavory headlines about selling their gaming GPUs to AI farms, much less gambling on a return from a startup.
 
Joined
Apr 9, 2020
Messages
301 (0.19/day)
This guy screams main character syndrome.

I mean, what did he expect, to use public media to force a vendor to open our proprietary microcode for his own benefit and at expense of the said vendor?

Gee, who would have thought how this would end...
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
21,448 (6.00/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
If you don't know who Geohot is, you are very new.
He is absolutely right here, software of AMD gpu's are a mess, only fanboys would disagree.
He is giving AMD a fighting chance to compete with NVIDIA by kickstarting the grassroots enthusiasm for their chips in ML. And AMD is throwing it away.
Another reason to never buy an AMD gpu, their software team is just too incompetent.
He ain't giving shit, he's trying to get a free lunch here to kickstart his own company.

Let me help you help me, is what this is. I smell narcissism, bigtime.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
360 (0.10/day)
This guy screams main character syndrome.

I mean, what did he expect, to use public media to force a vendor to open our proprietary microcode for his own benefit and at expense of the said vendor?

Gee, who would have thought how this would end...
And you must do this all in 2 weeks...lol
 
Top