Setting my expectations VERY low, between the disappointing performance on the mobile core ultra parts (mostly massive reduction in MT) all they can really hope to do is reign in power consumption so it’s not obscenely in-efficient out of the box.
System Name | "Icy Resurrection" |
---|---|
Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM |
Memory | 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V |
Video Card(s) | ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition |
Storage | 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD |
Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
Case | Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Microsoft Classic Intellimouse |
Keyboard | Galax Stealth STL-03 |
Software | Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2 |
Benchmark Scores | I pulled a Qiqi~ |
We already know E-cores are pointless in a non-battery powered device.
This time Amd has the chance to prove that SMT/HT is more important than additional, fake, cores.
Hmmm....So let me get this straight no more Hyper Threading U9 will have "only" 8 performance cores but 16 efficient cores there are rumors around the net that we could expect better improvements in IPC from 5% to 15% with P-cores 'tho some people claim it will be much better improvements when it comes to the E-cores then again U9 285 have in total 24 Threads compared to the I9 14900k that have 32 Threads....hmmm is it going to be better in multithreads apps at all??? ....I mean most likely is going to be much more efficient when it comes to the power draw and probably great for gaming especially for games that don't use more than 8c.....Hmm I don't know it does not look so promising + I personally never liked when some company have need to put in product name something like "ultra" ...."extra"..."mega"..."superb"......
So, I guess it's 4.5GHz with Intel Baseline Profile for the top model?
I wonder if that 5.5 is final. And at what wattage. If Intel stays at 5.5 for the final top product, then they either can't go higher, don't need to go higher thanks to IPC gains, or knew that their silicon was having instability and degrading issues at 6.x GHz and decided this time to stay at safer frequencies. Of course it is a new chip, new architecture, new node, anything can be a reason.
If your current setup is still doing fine, is there any need to jump straight onto zen 5 or arrow lake anyway, so the 6mths does not really matter. With zen 5 i would rather wait 6mths anyway for them to get their ageesa shit together, unless they are on the ball with it this time.
System Name | Budget Box |
---|---|
Processor | Xeon E5-2667v2 |
Motherboard | ASUS P9X79 Pro |
Cooling | Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno |
Memory | 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC |
Video Card(s) | XFX RX 5600XT |
Storage | WD NVME 1GB |
Display(s) | ASUS Pro Art 27" |
Case | Antec P7 Neo |
I have an Adler Lake laptop for work, where the "i7" grade is 2P+8E. Performance leaves much to be desired for an i7. Just today, I pasted into Excel that had a decent amount of calculations to do. It pegged the 2P cores while the 8E cores were underutilized. It was slow, too. Even 4P+0E would be faster, IMO. Running W11, Office, and I never notice the E cores getting fully utilized for parallel tasks. The P cores get bogged down and then it's time to wait.We already know E-cores are pointless in a non-battery powered device.
This time Amd has the chance to prove that SMT/HT is more important than additional, fake, cores.
System Name | Raptor Baked |
---|---|
Processor | 14900k w.c. |
Motherboard | Z790 Hero |
Cooling | w.c. |
Memory | 32GB Hynix |
Video Card(s) | Zotac 4080 w.c. |
Storage | 2TB Kingston kc3k |
Display(s) | Gigabyte 34" Curved |
Case | Corsair 460X |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard |
Power Supply | PCIe5 850w |
Mouse | Asus |
Keyboard | Corsair |
Software | Win 11 |
Benchmark Scores | Cool n Quiet. |
According to wccftech a claimed reliable source is now saying this will be a much lower figure, see wccftech story 'AMD Zen 5 CPUs Rumored To Feature Around 10% IPC Increase, Slightly More In Cinebench R23 Single-Thread Test'.I predict bases on rumors that the Ryzen 9 9950X will be on average 30-40% faster for traditional computing tasks.
This is not true at all and has entirely to do with the architecture. Without diving deep into the rabbit hole, the architecture (and the workload) determines whether there's any benefit to HT or not. There can be massive benefits or none at all. I believe Ian Cuttress had an article when he was at Anandtech a few years back, have a read.It's more that with 24 cores, you don't need HT, which is a security hole, makes cores more complex, and was introduced to help low core count CPUs.
In the age of massive core counts HT/SMT is not needed. Without it you can clock higher, use less voltage, and design more secure processors.
System Name | Silent |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7800X3D @ 5.15ghz BCLK OC, TG AM5 High Performance Heatspreader |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix X670E-I, chipset fans removed |
Cooling | Optimus Block, HWLABS Copper 240/40 + 240/30, D5/Res, 4x Noctua A12x25, 2x A4x10, Mayhems Ultra Pure |
Memory | 32 GB Dominator Platinum 6150 MT 26-36-36-48, 56.6ns AIDA, 2050 FCLK, 160 ns tRFC, active cooled |
Video Card(s) | RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition, Conductonaut Extreme, 18 W/mK MinusPad Extreme, Corsair XG7 Waterblock |
Storage | Intel Optane DC P1600X 118 GB, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB |
Display(s) | 32" 240 Hz 1440p Samsung G7, 31.5" 165 Hz 1440p LG NanoIPS Ultragear, MX900 dual gas VESA mount |
Case | Sliger SM570 CNC Aluminium 13-Litre, 3D printed feet, custom front panel pump/res combo |
Audio Device(s) | Audeze Maxwell Ultraviolet, Razer Nommo Pro |
Power Supply | SF750 Plat, full transparent custom cables, Sentinel Pro 1500 Online Double Conversion UPS w/Noctua |
Mouse | Razer Viper Pro V2 8 KHz Mercury White w/Tiger Ice Skates & Pulsar Supergrip tape |
Keyboard | Wooting 60HE+, TOFU-R CNC Alu/Brass, SS Prismcaps W, Jellykey, Lube/Mod, TLabs Leath/Suede Wristrest |
Software | Windows 10 IoT Enterprise LTSC 19044.4046 |
Benchmark Scores | Legendary |
So what did I say that is factually incorrect. Be specific.This is not true at all and has entirely to do with the architecture. Without diving deep into the rabbit hole, the architecture (and the workload) determines whether there's any benefit to HT or not. There can be massive benefits or none at all. I believe Ian Cuttress had an article when he was at Anandtech a few years back, have a read.
Being a TPU staff, I'd expect you to check your facts better before putting out blanket statements like this.
System Name | Sunk Cost Fallacy |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
Motherboard | ASRock B650E Steel Legend Wifi |
Cooling | Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 |
Memory | 2x16GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 6000 CL30 (A-Die) |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4090 Gaming X Trio |
Storage | WD Black SN850X 1TB + 2x 2TB, 2x 4TB Crucial MX500, 4TB Samsung 870 Evo. |
Display(s) | Alienware AW2723DF, LG 27GR93U, LG 27GN950-B |
Case | Streacom BC1 V2 |
Audio Device(s) | Bose Companion Series 2 III, Sennheiser GSP600 and HD599 SE - Creative Soundblaster X4 |
Power Supply | bequiet! Dark Power Pro 12 1500w Titanium |
Mouse | Logitech GPRO X Superlight & G502 X |
Keyboard | Corsair K65 RGB Mini, Razer Black Widow V3 TKL |
VR HMD | Oculus Rift S |
System Name | "Icy Resurrection" |
---|---|
Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM |
Memory | 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V |
Video Card(s) | ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition |
Storage | 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD |
Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
Case | Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Microsoft Classic Intellimouse |
Keyboard | Galax Stealth STL-03 |
Software | Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2 |
Benchmark Scores | I pulled a Qiqi~ |
2024 and Intel still sells 8 Cores as their top Product.
System Name | Budget Box |
---|---|
Processor | Xeon E5-2667v2 |
Motherboard | ASUS P9X79 Pro |
Cooling | Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno |
Memory | 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC |
Video Card(s) | XFX RX 5600XT |
Storage | WD NVME 1GB |
Display(s) | ASUS Pro Art 27" |
Case | Antec P7 Neo |
Apple doesn't use SMT, and they use a really wide architecture.This is not true at all and has entirely to do with the architecture. Without diving deep into the rabbit hole, the architecture (and the workload) determines whether there's any benefit to HT or not. There can be massive benefits or none at all. I believe Ian Cuttress had an article when he was at Anandtech a few years back, have a read.
Being a TPU staff, I'd expect you to check your facts better before putting out blanket statements like this.
Very nice comparisons. Its good to know there are changes between Raptor Lake and Arrow Lake. Let’s see if it translates into IPC improvements. Right now Raptor Lake has a 10% IPC advantage over Zen 4.Skylake - SunnyCove
micro-ops(decode + uop cache) from 11 to 11 +0%
Dispatch/Rename from 4 to 5 +25%
execution ports from 8 to 10 +25%
With 2xFP/ALU + 2xALU, 1xS/D + 3xAGU
for 3xFP/ALU + 1xALU, 2xS/D + 4xAGU
IPC average +18%
SunnyCove - GoldenCove
micro-ops(decode + uop cache) from 11 to 14 +27%
Dispatch/Rname from 5 to 6 +20%
execution ports from 10 to 12 +20%
With 3xFP/ALU + 1xALU, 2xS/D + 4xAGU
for 3xFP/ALU + 2xALU, 2xS/D + 5xAGU
FPU+ALU from 4 to 5 +25%
IPC average +19%
GoldenCove - LionCove
micro-ops(decode + uop cache) from 14 to 24 +71.4%
Dispatch/Rename from 6 to 8 +33.3%
execution ports from 12 to 18 +50%
With 3xFP/ALU + 2xALU, 2xS/D + 5xAGU
up to 4xFPU, 6xALU, 2xS/D + 6xAGU
FPU+ALU from 5 to 10 +100%
IPC average +??%
Two different diagrams of the LionCove core from LunarLake graphics:
![]()
LionCove introduces a larger scale redesign and expansion than previously SunnyCove to Skylake and GoldenCove to SunnyCove. I don't know how much of an increase in IPC this will give, but I have a feeling that it will be more than what the current leaks say.
ArrowLake is based on LionCove and Skymont cores.
Skymont has a 3x 3-way(9-Way) decoder, while Gracemont has a 2x 3-way(6-Way) decoder, which is an increase of 50%.
LionCove core:
Intel always represents the Predictor as one block in the diagram. In the case of LionCove it looks like 4 Tier or 4-Way.
LionCove has 24 ops from the decoder and uop cache. GoldenCobe has 14 uops (6 from the decoder and 8 from the uop cache). LionCove has an 8-10-Way and 16-14 decoder with uop cache.
I’m also including clock speed improvements but it will not be as fast as I said if IPC only goes up 10%zAccording to wccftech a claimed reliable source is now saying this will be a much lower figure, see wccftech story 'AMD Zen 5 CPUs Rumored To Feature Around 10% IPC Increase, Slightly More In Cinebench R23 Single-Thread Test'.
Also wccftech say that "...the 40% rumor never talked about IPC and only talked about a specific SPEC result".
So what did I say that is factually incorrect. Be specific.
I mean, the disadvantage of having cores with different ISA's are on an entirely different level compared to having two different CCD's with the same cores. Even having Zen4c's on a different CCD is better than intel's approach for pretty much any server workload and sometimes causes issues on the client side as well.This isn't their top tier product, just in the same way Ryzen 9s aren't top tier products for AMD. Both of them also have 8-cores as their maximum if you nitpick, because that's what each CCD on a Ryzen chip has. The Ryzen 9's have drawbacks all the same.
System Name | "Icy Resurrection" |
---|---|
Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM |
Memory | 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V |
Video Card(s) | ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition |
Storage | 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD |
Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
Case | Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Microsoft Classic Intellimouse |
Keyboard | Galax Stealth STL-03 |
Software | Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2 |
Benchmark Scores | I pulled a Qiqi~ |
I mean, the disadvantage of having cores with different ISA's are on an entirely different level compared to having two different CCD's with the same cores. Even having Zen4c's on a different CCD is better than intel's approach for pretty much any server workload and sometimes causes issues on the client side as well.
"all the same" isn't really the same.
System Name | Budget Box |
---|---|
Processor | Xeon E5-2667v2 |
Motherboard | ASUS P9X79 Pro |
Cooling | Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno |
Memory | 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC |
Video Card(s) | XFX RX 5600XT |
Storage | WD NVME 1GB |
Display(s) | ASUS Pro Art 27" |
Case | Antec P7 Neo |
Except I see in real life usage that the E cores don't get fully used when the poor P cores are maxed out. And this is in Excel, something that should handle parallel threads when doing the same calculations over and over. It just doesn't happen, and this is with W11.The only disadvantage is that they're not as powerful, but that doesn't mean they're slouches either. Gracemont E-cores have very similar performance to an i7-6700K's Skylake core. And we're having 16 additional cores, complete with hardware-based thread scheduling and an operating system capable of correctly addressing them for maximum efficiency.
I'd argue that the Ryzen 9 X3D's are the ones with an issue, considered the performance inconsistencies due to mismatched cache sizes across CCDs, cross-CCD latencies, eventual Infinity Fabric bottlenecks and of course, lacking the hardware thread scheduler entirely... and even that doesn't really matter to most workloads, these compromises are intentional from preventing the CPU from being a little too good on the AMD side.
If only Intel weren't facing Zen 5 quite soon or Zen 5 X3D early next year.
The only disadvantage is that they're not as powerful, but that doesn't mean they're slouches either. Gracemont E-cores have very similar performance to an i7-6700K's Skylake core. And we're having 16 additional cores, complete with hardware-based thread scheduling and an operating system capable of correctly addressing them for maximum efficiency.
I'd argue that the Ryzen 9 X3D's are the ones with an issue, considered the performance inconsistencies due to mismatched cache sizes across CCDs, cross-CCD latencies, eventual Infinity Fabric bottlenecks and of course, lacking the hardware thread scheduler entirely... and even that doesn't really matter to most workloads, these compromises are intentional from preventing the CPU from being a little too good on the AMD side.
System Name | "Icy Resurrection" |
---|---|
Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM |
Memory | 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V |
Video Card(s) | ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition |
Storage | 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD |
Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
Case | Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Microsoft Classic Intellimouse |
Keyboard | Galax Stealth STL-03 |
Software | Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2 |
Benchmark Scores | I pulled a Qiqi~ |
Except I see in real life usage that the E cores don't get fully used when the poor P cores are maxed out. And this is in Excel, something that should handle parallel threads when doing the same calculations over and over. It just doesn't happen, and this is with W11.
Nope, the only disadvantage is not that they're not powerful. Note that I mentioned server workloads. In that scenario, the p/e-cores heterogeneous arch simply doesn't work. Look at their lineup, do you see any? Ignoring the fact that AMD destroys them in that space, but they can only go either full e-core or full p-core. Even AMD didn't do a Zen 4/Zen4c combo for servers, because their workloads don't like mixing and matching at all.
Secondly, intel's hardware scheduler simply gives pointers to windows to schedule it correctly, but it doesn't work all the time as Darmok pointed out and there are other cases too. AMD doesn't face the same issue on workloads other than games. Ian did a deep dive into it but I think it was a podcast, I can't seem to find it in a pinch. AMD tried to go all software route for X3D, simply because the only thing they need to schedule strictly to the 8 cores are games, the rest of the workloads will perform similarly with the same scheduler used for the 7950x. So yeah, the game bar is finicky with older games and a solution similar to intel would work better for sure, but that's only for games. For the rest of workloads, they simply do not need a hardware scheduling pointer.
Processor | 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.4, 4.8Ghz Ring 190W PL1 |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI 690-I PRO |
Cooling | Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans |
Memory | 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4090 FE |
Storage | 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr |
Display(s) | Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED |
Case | SLIGER S620 |
Audio Device(s) | Yes |
Power Supply | Corsair SF750 |
Mouse | Xlite V2 |
Keyboard | RoyalAxe |
Software | Windows 11 |
Benchmark Scores | They're pretty good, nothing crazy. |
That's not why "it doesn't work" -- servers aren't personal devices and they're not workstations - they're pieced out into 1000 VMs and docker containers to rent out compute, so yeah if that's your function that heterogeneous won't work for that purpose. 0% of gamers and a tiny fraction of consumers have that purpose. SMT and HT is old bloated tech -- that always had a single core perfomance hit -- a hit we were willing to take for more multithreaded performance but if you can meet that using another specialized core, then you will gain performance just from the design.Nope, the only disadvantage is not that they're not powerful. Note that I mentioned server workloads. In that scenario, the p/e-cores heterogeneous arch simply doesn't work. Look at their lineup, do you see any? Ignoring the fact that AMD destroys them in that space, but they can only go either full e-core or full p-core. Even AMD didn't do a Zen 4/Zen4c combo for servers, because their workloads don't like mixing and matching at all.
Secondly, intel's hardware scheduler simply gives pointers to windows to schedule it correctly, but it doesn't work all the time as Darmok pointed out and there are other cases too. AMD doesn't face the same issue on workloads other than games. Ian did a deep dive into it but I think it was a podcast, I can't seem to find it in a pinch. AMD tried to go all software route for X3D, simply because the only thing they need to schedule strictly to the 8 cores are games, the rest of the workloads will perform similarly with the same scheduler used for the 7950x. So yeah, the game bar is finicky with older games and a solution similar to intel would work better for sure, but that's only for games. For the rest of workloads, they simply do not need a hardware scheduling pointer.
Not sure what you mean when you say 'thats not why it doesnt work'. I didn't even state why it doesnt work, but stated that it doesn't work in the server space. For consumers, any heterogenous arch will work as long as the scheduler is up to scratch. I wasn't even talking about the consumer space but merely pointing out that intel's hardware scheduler doesn't always work and AMD doesn't face the same limitation with X3D's other than games.I think people are going to be surprised... this is on a new node.
That's not why "it doesn't work" -- servers aren't personal devices and they're not workstations - they're pieced out into 1000 VMs and docker containers to rent out compute, so yeah if that's your function that heterogeneous won't work for that purpose. 0% of gamers and a tiny fraction of consumers have that purpose. SMT and HT is old bloated tech -- that always had a single core perfomance hit -- a hit we were willing to take for more multithreaded performance but if you can meet that using another specialized core, then you will gain performance just from the design.
The intel 14th gen optimization tool was quite eye opening -- double % gains in some games with just software e-core optimizations; we are comparing early heterogeneous implementation to end stage HT/SMT...
All mobile devices, consumer devices... have been using heterogenous and AMD is moving there with Zen 6 too - because it actually works great. It's the only way intel was even able to stay competitive on an inferior node.
Processor | Ryzen 9 3900x |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI B550 Gaming Plus |
Cooling | be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 |
Memory | 32GB GSkill Ripjaws V 3600CL16 |
Video Card(s) | 3060Ti FE 0.9v |
Storage | Samsung 970 EVO 1TB, 2x Samsung 840 EVO 1TB |
Display(s) | ASUS ProArt PA278QV |
Case | be quiet! Pure Base 500 |
Audio Device(s) | Edifier R1850DB |
Power Supply | Super Flower Leadex III 650W |
Mouse | A4Tech X-748K |
Keyboard | Logitech K300 |
Software | Win 10 Pro 64bit |
Is it though? 2E cores are about equal to 1P core, so 8+16 configuration is pretty much the same as 16P core CPU in MT performance.2024 and Intel still sells 8 Cores as their top Product.
Xeons are monolithic, it's clear as day that it's just not gonna scale to the same level as a multi-chiplet MCM.
Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi |
Cooling | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 |
Memory | 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14 |
Video Card(s) | MSI GeForce RTX2070 |
Storage | Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB |
Display(s) | Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide |
Case | Cooler Master Cosmos |
Audio Device(s) | O2 USB Headphone AMP |
Power Supply | Corsair HX850i |
Mouse | Logitech G502 |
Keyboard | Cherry MX |
Software | Windows 11 |
System Name | PC-GX1 |
---|---|
Processor | i9 10900 non K (stock) TDP 65w |
Motherboard | asrock b560 steel legend | Realtek ALC897 |
Cooling | cooler master hyper 2x12 LED turbo argb | 5x12cm fan rgb intake | 3x12cm fan rgb exhaust |
Memory | corsair vengeance LPX 2x32gb ddr4 3600mhz |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 3080 10GB Gaming Z Trio LHR TDP 370w| 560.81 WHQL | MSI AB v4.65 | RTSS v7.36 |
Storage | NVME 2+2TB gen3| SSD 4TB sata3 | 1+2TB 7200rpm sata3| 4+4+5TB USB3 (optional) |
Display(s) | AOC U34P2C (IPS panel, 3440x1440 75hz) + speaker 5W*2 | APC BX1100CI MS (660w) |
Case | lianli lancool 2 mesh RGB windows - white edition | 1x dvd-RW usb 3.0 (optional) |
Audio Device(s) | Nakamichi soundstation8w 2.1 100W RMS | Simbadda CST 9000N+ 2.1 352W RMS |
Power Supply | seasonic focus gx-850w 80+ gold - white edition 2021 | APC BX2200MI MS (1200w) |
Mouse | steelseries sensei ten | logitech g440 |
Keyboard | steelseries apex 5 | steelseries QCK prism cloth XL | steelseries arctis 5 |
VR HMD | - |
Software | dvd win 10 home 64bit oem + full update 22H2 |
Benchmark Scores | - |