- Joined
- Jul 13, 2016
- Messages
- 3,319 (1.08/day)
Processor | Ryzen 7800X3D |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock X670E Taichi |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 Chromax |
Memory | 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 4090 Trio |
Storage | Too much |
Display(s) | Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz |
Case | Thermaltake Core X9 |
Audio Device(s) | Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w |
Mouse | G305 |
Keyboard | Wooting HE60 |
VR HMD | Valve Index |
Software | Win 10 |
The market doesn't really agree with that and that's really all that matters..... I honestly think even if AMD charged 50% less it wouldn't matter.
Marketshare and what the market thinks are two different things that frequently don't align in today's world. A good example of this is smart devices, phones ect. I very much doubt people buying phones like the fact that the battery isn't replaceable by the end user, that internal storage is often non-expandable, and that you no longer have a headphone jack. It happens anyways though against the will of customers. The same thing applies to cars with subscriptions, smart devices that can prevent you from using them and are always online, ect. It's not that the market decided they want those features, it's that manufacturers were able to force customers to accept those by providing customers either no other option, having other features a customer wants / needs, or by locking them in one way or another. Another great example is probably Adobe products, who's customers often have zero choice given how locked down they have the ecosystem. I very much doubt customers like that they are forced to give Adobe their IP rights to feed their AI or that Adobe is actively trying to scam them.
The GPU market has a high level of software lock in that's only increased over the years. It's also not like the market wants to pay ridiculously high prices for GPUs, it's just that Nvidia and AMD price around each other more than compete on price.
As I pointed out earlier, even AMD's bulldozer received 19.4% marketshare yet GPU wise AMD only sits at 10% GPU marketshare. We can (hopefully) all agree that RDNA is a better architecture than bulldozer. To say the the market thinks AMD only deserves 10% despite this juxtaposition fails to provide any logic behind such reasoning. You said your last good AMD card was the R9 290X but that card was not as good comparatively to the 6900 XT / 7900 XT. The blower 290X ran at up to 101-102c stock. Aftermarket cards were much better but it was still a small step up form the 7970 GHz. I had both those cards and a 780 Ti and I dealt with plenty of the models throughout that generation for customer builds. AMD's drivers are much better now, a decent amount of 7970 cards had intermittent flickering issues. It wasn't the end of the world but it was annoying. It was about as annoying as some picky 3000 series cards. Had a couple of occasions where a 3060 would look like it's artificating on a customer's display even though it was completely fine during testing. Turns out they just don't like certain displays over HDMI.
Last edited: