• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

TSMC Boosts 2 nm Yields by 6%, Passing Savings to Customers

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,607 (0.98/day)
Being the leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing company, TSMC actively works on increasing the efficiency of its upcoming nodes, even when they are finalized and ready for high-volume manufacturing. According to a TSMC employee identified as Dr. Kim on X, recent test runs of the 2 nm N2 nodes show a 6% improvement in production yields compared to baseline expectations. This advancement could translate into substantial cost savings for the company's customers when mass production begins in late 2025. However, specific details about whether the gains were achieved in SRAM or logic test chips remain undisclosed. The timing is particularly noteworthy as TSMC prepares to launch its shuttle test wafer services for 2 nm technology in January. The N2 process represents a giant leap for TSMC, marking its first gate-all-around (GAA) nanosheet transistors implementation, the first step to derive from the classical FinFET design.

According to TSMC's projections, chips manufactured using the N2 process will consume 25-30% less power while maintaining the same transistor count and frequency as its N3E node. Additionally, the technology is expected to deliver 10-15% performance improvements and achieve a 15% increase in transistor density. A key innovation in the N2 process is the enhanced design of its GAA nanosheet transistors, which offers improved electrostatic control and reduced gate leakage compared to 3 nm FinFET transistors, given that the gate can be controlled from all sides. This advancement enables smaller high-density transistors to maintain reliable performance through better threshold voltage tuning capabilities. With approximately seven to eight months until full-scale volume production begins, the company has a substantial window to optimize the manufacturing process further and potentially achieve additional yield improvements, although that is less likely.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2010
Messages
571 (0.11/day)
Location
mississauga, on, Canada
System Name YACS amd
Processor 5800x,
Motherboard gigabyte x570 aorus gaming elite.
Cooling bykski GPU, and CPU, syscooling p93x pump
Memory corsair vengeance pro rgb, 3600 ddr4 stock timings.
Video Card(s) xfx merc 310 7900xtx
Storage kingston kc3000 2TB, amongst others. Fanxiang s770 2TB
Display(s) benq ew3270u, or acer XB270hu, acer XB280hk, asus VG 278H,
Case lian li LANCOOL III
Audio Device(s) obs,
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti pro 1000w
Mouse logitech g703
Keyboard durogod keyboard. (cherry brown switches)
Software win 11, win10pro.
TSMC works hard for the money and also to save money for its customers, meanwhile, intel is “weekend at bernies” lol…
 

Count von Schwalbe

nocturnum moderatum
Staff member
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
Messages
3,114 (2.79/day)
Location
Knoxville, TN, USA
System Name Work Computer | Unfinished Computer
Processor Core i7-6700 | Ryzen 5 5600X
Motherboard Dell Q170 | Gigabyte Aorus Elite Wi-Fi
Cooling A fan? | Truly Custom Loop
Memory 4x4GB Crucial 2133 C17 | 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 3600 C26
Video Card(s) Dell Radeon R7 450 | RTX 2080 Ti FE
Storage Crucial BX500 2TB | TBD
Display(s) 3x LG QHD 32" GSM5B96 | TBD
Case Dell | Heavily Modified Phanteks P400
Power Supply Dell TFX Non-standard | EVGA BQ 650W
Mouse Monster No-Name $7 Gaming Mouse| TBD
Yields improvements always save money for the customers, no?

Last I checked, fabs sold wafer allocation, not individual chips. As long as the price doesn't go up, then the customer is the one who benefits. And IIRC the 2nm contracts were already signed.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,882 (0.65/day)
According to plans, it's looking like volume production of the following by the end of 2025/beginning of 2026:

INTC - 18A, >200MTr/mm^2
TSMC - N2, >250MTr/mm^2
SMSG - SF2, >200MTr/mm^2

BTW, that's an extreme shredding of Intel process roadmaps that forecasted Intel 3, 20A and 18A all by the end of this year.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,819 (0.56/day)
Cool...so 25-30% reduction and 10-15% performance uplift.

Quick back of the hand math means 75% of the energy cost for 110% of the performance, or a die of the same size theoretically having 1.1/0.75=1.467 of the performance per watt, or a 46.7% uplift in performance per watt. If we look at the generational gap as about 15% per price bracket, that's mean a middle tier card can have either a much smaller die size (factoring in the 15% density increase in transistors) while running cooler and having the same performance, or have roughly the same die size without melting down.

This would be great if we actually saw any of this savings as consumers...but given that all of this wafer production is going to go to AI accelerators, given they are the biggest margin product on the market right now, it's not going to do anything but pad budgets. Sigh...wish we could see some of that price decrease...
 
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
145 (0.09/day)
Cool...so 25-30% reduction and 10-15% performance uplift.

Quick back of the hand math means 75% of the energy cost for 110% of the performance, or a die of the same size theoretically having 1.1/0.75=1.467 of the performance per watt, or a 46.7% uplift in performance per watt. If we look at the generational gap as about 15% per price bracket, that's mean a middle tier card can have either a much smaller die size (factoring in the 15% density increase in transistors) while running cooler and having the same performance, or have roughly the same die size without melting down.
The power reduction number is for same performance, it does not include the higher performance ceiling. It still looks good.
 

AcE

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2024
Messages
15 (7.50/day)
Only 15% more density we are nearing the flat curve and need better tech to make high strides again. Silicon is at its end.

nonetheless this will probably blow Intel out of the water, same with Samsung.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: N/A
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,520 (2.46/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
Silicon is at its end.
If we could use pure neutron crystals as semiconductors, but still had the same chip manufacturing tech, how much you think we could increase density?
 

AcE

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2024
Messages
15 (7.50/day)
If we could use pure neutron crystals as semiconductors, but still had the same chip manufacturing tech, how much you think we could increase density?
Not familiar with neutron crystals but there were a few materials mentioned as successor of Silicon and one of them was graphene I think, among others I forgot. I also made a typo in the other post, I meant “density” ofc. 15% is really not a lot compared to prior times where we got near double, double or at least 50%, 35% in younger times. It’s really at its end.
 
Top