- Joined
- Jan 14, 2019
- Messages
- 14,892 (6.63/day)
- Location
- Midlands, UK
System Name | My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
Motherboard | MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi |
Cooling | be quiet! Dark Rock 4 |
Memory | 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance EXPO DDR5-6000 CL36 |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT |
Storage | 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda |
Display(s) | Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz |
Case | Kolink Citadel Mesh |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones |
Power Supply | 750 W Seasonic Prime GX |
Mouse | Logitech MX Master 2S |
Keyboard | Logitech G413 SE |
Software | Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma |
You can also have better profit if you minimise expenses - which is exactly why we'll only have two RDNA 4 chips. The burger van in the corner doesn't have to compete with McDonald's for market share.But the latter is a component of the former. After all, with 0 marketshare you have nobody buying your product and therefore 0 possible profit! Yes, it is possible to have a very small marketshare but massive profits, if you are in a very niche industry and/or have a captive target market (e.g. ASML to TSMC) - which is not the case for consumer products. So therefore in the consumer space, it is entirely correct to say that companies live on their marketshare.
Sure, market share is important in AMD's case, but not important enough to sell GPUs at a loss.