• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

1920 x 1080.....on a 32" MONITOR, not TV

Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
122 (0.03/day)
So may I ask-------how is gaming



So may I ask, how is gaming on the 27" at 1920 x 1080? I'm guessing it's great.

But reading text? I'm guessing not so great? Due to LCD interpolation?

Yep, pretty much spot on. For gaming, it is perfect! (It's a Benq XL2720Z)

On the desktop, the text size is perfect. But compared to a crt, at the same dot pixel pitch, it's a little less defined.

Still quite readable for extended periods, but I would go for a smaller dot pixel pitch if I was reading alot of text/using a lcd as my everyday computer. i.e. I would go a 32 inch 1440p, or 24 inch 1920p, then up the text size a touch.

Hi guys,

I'm currently using a 8-year old, 24" LG monitor with M-PVA panel. I play most of my games and perform daily computing in 1920 x 1200 (16:10). This monitor has a 8ms response time

Recently it (finally) occurred to me that small text at 1920 x 1200 is pretty hard to read, even though 1920 x 1200 is the "native" resolution of 24" monitor. Case in point, text in System Shock 2 or Titan Quest at such resolution is virtually impossible to read.

Hence I'm looking at getting this monitor: Samsung S32D850T. Sorry I can't paste URLs here as forum wouldn't let me. It's basically a 32" monitor with a 5ms response time, native resolution being 2560 x 1440 (16:9)

BUT my plan is to use 1920 x 1080 (16:9) on this 32" monitor, for both gaming and daily computing. The whole idea is to display the same amount of pixels in a larger amount oh physical space, resulting in a larger pixel pitch, thus easier on the eyes.

Will this plan work? Or will I be experiencing a "blurry" look? I *am* OK with dealing with a pixelated look, but cannot deal with a interpolated "blurry" look, if this makes any sense?

Please pitch in to enlighten me, before I drop $700 on this monitor, thanks in advance!

Just re-read your original post.

The main thing you don't want to do is use a non native resolution. So downsizing a 1440p monitor to run at 1080p won't look great.

It will still work, and be quite readable, but it won't look as good, including graphics in games.

I think you really need to go to a local store, or a friends house, that has a recent lcd (monitor), and have a look to see which way you want to go. Old lcd's differ a little in terms of clearness. But it's inherent in lcd's that the text isn't completely perfect.

I would think that if you compared your current lcd with a recent lcd, you would find that text would be a bit clearer.

One thing I should note is that I only know about TN panels. An IPS panel might be clearer? Google might help you on that one, or someone else could chime in and let us know?

Cheers :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

frostdiamond

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
11 (0.00/day)
Just re-read your original post.

The main thing you don't want to do is use a non native resolution. So downsizing a 1440p monitor to run at 1080p won't look great.

It will still work, and be quite readable, but it won't look as good, including graphics in games.

I think you really need to go to a local store, or a friends house, that has a recent lcd (monitor), and have a look to see which way you want to go. Old lcd's differ a little in terms of clearness. But it's inherent in lcd's that the text isn't completely perfect.

I would think that if you compared your current lcd with a recent lcd, you would find that text would be a bit clearer.

One thing I should note is that I only know about TN panels. An IPS panel might be clearer? Google might help you on that one, or someone else could chime in and let us know?

Cheers :)


Hey man, that's exactly what I'm going to do-------check out and play with different LCDs in different resolutions at local BestBuy / computer stores.

I guess I came from the old days when 800 x 600 still looked OK on a 17" CRT when 1024 x 767 was its "native". I guess things just aren't the same with LCDs. The reason for my post is because I find text at 24" native (1920 x 1080) is too small to read, hence I'd like to read at such resolution on a larger monitor, but this doesn't quite work with LCDs, as it it would've, with CRTs.
 

frostdiamond

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
11 (0.00/day)
If your budget is $700, then the 27" benq is actually $100 cheaper, and the 2nd best choice for gaming (only the new rog swift is better, but its around $400 more, and it's 1440p at 27").

Here is 2 thorough reviews of both panel,

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/benq_xl2720z.htm

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/asus_rog_swift_pg278q.htm


We could actually get the BENQ for $450 here

http://www.ncix.com/detail/benq-xl2720z-27in-led-144hz-b7-92842.htm

And the SWIFT uses 2560 x 1440 as its native, so I'm going to skip that (remember I wanted a large dot pitch)

Both panels are TN, whereas I prefer IPS. I'm going to check out display models at retail shops and post here again!
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
5,047 (0.95/day)
Location
Iberian Peninsula
YES, please do let me know your feed back. If you could try running 1920 x 1080 on your 32", and let me know what you see? Thanks man!

I just changed desktop resolution for you, from 2500x1400 to 1900x1000. Text is perfect. This Benq BL3200PT is a Pro/CAD monitor, might have better drawing features than baseline gaming and surfing monitors, because the quality I am seeing in everything is amazing. And its reported slowness I notice it more in fast scroling in photos than in gaming.
 

frostdiamond

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
11 (0.00/day)
I just changed desktop resolution for you, from 2500x1400 to 1900x1000. Text is perfect. This Benq BL3200PT is a Pro/CAD monitor, might have better drawing features than baseline gaming and surfing monitors, because the quality I am seeing in everything is amazing. And its reported slowness I notice it more in fast scroling in photos than in gaming.

Thank you sir very much for feedback. I shall report back with my own feed back once I pick up a 32"!
 
Top