• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Arrow Lake Retested with Latest 24H2 Updates and 0x114 Microcode

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,957 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Yesterday, Intel announced that they had root-caused the majority of Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200 performance problems, and that OS updates are already available. We tested Windows 11 24H2 with the new patches, and also compare results with 23H2 and a new motherboard BIOS.

Show full review
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
4,676 (0.94/day)
Location
in a van down by the river
Processor faster at instructions than yours
Motherboard more nurturing than yours
Cooling frostier than yours
Memory superior scheduling & haphazardly entry than yours
Video Card(s) better rasterization than yours
Storage more ample than yours
Display(s) increased pixels than yours
Case fancier than yours
Audio Device(s) further audible than yours
Power Supply additional amps x volts than yours
Mouse without as much gnawing as yours
Keyboard less clicky than yours
VR HMD not as odd looking as yours
Software extra mushier than yours
Benchmark Scores up yours
"It seems that Intel did not "fix Arrow Lake," but they "fixed Arrow Lake on 24H2"—why isn't the company transparent and makes that clear in their messaging?"

I don't think anyone is shocked by this unfortunately
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,965 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
Thanks for the update w1z. Seems like its still good at what it's good at and unimpressive at what it's not.

Fixing 24H2 somewhat is still nice the age of having to use specific windows versions with specific processors is annoying.
 
Joined
May 13, 2024
Messages
8 (0.04/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard MSI Pro B550M-VC Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill RipJaws DDR4-3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus DUAL OC RTX 4070 Super
Storage 4TB NVME, 2TB SATA SSD, 4TB SATA HDD
Display(s) Dell S2722DGM 27" Curved VA 1440p 165hz
Case Fractal Design Pop Air MIni
Power Supply Corsair RMe 750W 80+ Gold
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard GMMK TKL RGB Black
VR HMD Oculus Quest 2
Honestly, I feel like Intel is getting too much flak for Arrow Lake. While they obviously need to improve things like thread assignment with the new architecture, I feel like most of the blame needs to be assigned to Microsoft. 24H2 is absolutely broken in every single way. Every day a new article comes out about how 24H2 broke a certain feature, or gaming performance, or a software. I work in IT, and we've had to roll back 24H2 on multiple computers because it breaks multiple unrelated pieces of software that are absolutely business-critical for us, so it's not just an issue with a single feature or part of Windows.

I'm very bullish on Intel overall, even with Arrow Lake. The big-little architecture was absolutely the right move for consumers (which AMD immediately copied), they've adopted the chiplet design after seeing how well it worked for AMD (and let AMD handle much of the "teething issues), and they've moving to drop native support for x86, which I think will pair very nicely with moving to single-threaded cores and allow them to simplify core design immensely.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
30 (0.02/day)
Location
Austria
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk
Cooling Noctua NH-15D
Memory Crucial Ballistix 4x 16GB, DDR4-3600, CL16 (tuned)
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 7900 XT Vapor-X
Storage Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 2x
Display(s) Gaming: LG OLED48CX9LB 4K@120Hz, Office: Samsung M7 M70A 4K@60Hz
Case be quiet! Pure Base 500DX
Power Supply be quiet! Straight Power 11 Platinum 750W
Software Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit
Honestly, I feel like Intel is getting too much flak for Arrow Lake. While they obviously need to improve things like thread assignment with the new architecture, I feel like most of the blame needs to be assigned to Microsoft. 24H2 is absolutely broken in every single way. Every day a new article comes out about how 24H2 broke a certain feature, or gaming performance, or a software. I work in IT, and we've had to roll back 24H2 on multiple computers because it breaks multiple unrelated pieces of software that are absolutely business-critical for us, so it's not just an issue with a single feature or part of Windows.

I'm very bullish on Intel overall, even with Arrow Lake. The big-little architecture was absolutely the right move for consumers (which AMD immediately copied), they've adopted the chiplet design after seeing how well it worked for AMD (and let AMD handle much of the "teething issues), and they've moving to drop native support for x86, which I think will pair very nicely with moving to single-threaded cores and allow them to simplify core design immensely.
even if blame on microsoft is justified, all the root cause of troubles was intel starting with the p/e cores mess. and amd is also not better with the 3d-v-cached cores vs normal cores.
 

OneMoar

There is Always Moar
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
8,800 (1.64/day)
Location
Rochester area
System Name RPC MK2.5
Processor Ryzen 5800x
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Pro V2
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit SE
Memory CL16 BL2K16G36C16U4RL 3600 1:1 micron e-die
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE RTX 3070 Ti GAMING OC
Storage Nextorage NE1N 2TB ADATA SX8200PRO NVME 512GB, Intel 545s 500GBSSD, ADATA SU800 SSD, 3TB Spinner
Display(s) LG Ultra Gear 32 1440p 165hz Dell 1440p 75hz
Case Phanteks P300 /w 300A front panel conversion
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus+ Platinum 750W
Mouse Kone burst Pro
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 7
Software Windows 11 +startisallback
tonight on tech news with moar: in a stunning non-development science has once again proven that No microcode can make a pig fly. this and other revelations at 11 stay tuned...
 

AcE

Joined
Dec 3, 2024
Messages
278 (16.35/day)
and amd is also not better with the 3d-v-cached cores vs normal cores.
AMD is totally different. You must see it like this: without Vcache it's the regular CPUs for people who don't need best performance in gaming, or don't game at all, the normal variant. X3D versions are specifically for gamers, so it makes sense to bring both.
 
Joined
May 13, 2024
Messages
8 (0.04/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard MSI Pro B550M-VC Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill RipJaws DDR4-3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus DUAL OC RTX 4070 Super
Storage 4TB NVME, 2TB SATA SSD, 4TB SATA HDD
Display(s) Dell S2722DGM 27" Curved VA 1440p 165hz
Case Fractal Design Pop Air MIni
Power Supply Corsair RMe 750W 80+ Gold
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard GMMK TKL RGB Black
VR HMD Oculus Quest 2
even if blame on microsoft is justified, all the root cause of troubles was intel starting with the p/e cores mess. and amd is also not better with the 3d-v-cached cores vs normal cores.
Intel was absolutely right to bring the p/e cores design to x86. ARM introduced it in 2012 and it's obviously been successful. Even Apple has it in their M chips. AMD has also adopted it in EPYC and their mobile chips. It just makes sense when you're trying to maximize both power efficiency and performance.

As for AMD, it's not a issue with the 3D cache specifically, it's been an issue ever since they introduced the multi-chiplet design. They've always had issues with thread assignment and trying to keep related threads (gaming or not) on the same CCD. That was part of the reason for Ryzen 9000's underwhelming launch, is there was thread assignment issues on the 9900X and 9950X. 3D cache just made it more obvious in gaming workloads.

There's always going to be shared responsibility between Microsoft and Intel/AMD to make a new architecture work. But innovation has to happen, and my point is that Microsoft bares much of the blame for both Arrow Lake and Zen 5 performance issues specifically because 24H2 is an obvious disaster. But the underlying philosophy of what AMD is doing (chiplets, 3D cache) and Intel is doing (single-threading, p/e cores) are solid.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,957 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Hey, why the scenario 24H2 / Dec 24 updates / Newest BIOS wasn't evaluated?
As explained in the text, twice. ALL 24H2 uses the newest BIOS
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
3,664 (1.70/day)
Location
UK, Midlands
System Name Main PC
Processor 13700k
Motherboard Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 Gig 3200CL14
Video Card(s) 4080 RTX SUPER FE 16G
Storage 1TB 980 PRO, 2TB SN850X, 2TB DC P4600, 1TB 860 EVO, 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-9
Power Supply Antec HCG 750 Gold
Software Windows 10 21H2 LTSC
That was fast @W1zzard I only asked for a new review some hours ago. :clap:

I am going to speculate it seems to be mostly scheduler side looking at your results, that would explain the sporadic improvements, and also why full threaded loads dont change much. The 6-30% claim seems to be :wtf:
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
2,147 (2.63/day)
Location
Brazil
System Name G-Station 2.0 "YGUAZU"
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 WiFi
Cooling Freezemod: Pump, Reservoir, 360mm Radiator, Fittings / Bykski: Blocks / Barrow: Meters
Memory Asgard Bragi DDR4-3600CL14 2x16GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire PULSE RX 7900 XTX
Storage 240GB Samsung 840 Evo, 1TB Asgard AN2, 2TB Hiksemi FUTURE-LITE, 320GB+1TB 7200RPM HDD
Display(s) Samsung 34" Odyssey OLED G8
Case Lian Li Lancool 216
Audio Device(s) Astro A40 TR + MixAmp
Power Supply Cougar GEX X2 1000W
Mouse Razer Viper Ultimate
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Elite (Red)
Software Windows 11 Pro
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Messages
163 (0.08/day)
But the underlying philosophy of what AMD is doing (chiplets, 3D cache) and Intel is doing (single-threading, p/e cores) are solid.
How is single threading a solid approach? Applications are multi thread aware and (hopefully) optimised as time passes. The age of monolithic dies is done.

Intel deserves all of the flak for an ass of a launch, and I have no idea why a true IT professional would be gung-ho for a company with absolute clustercuss launches. (Alder Lake, Degradation of 13/14th Gen, corrosion, Spectre/Meltdown?)
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
96 (0.04/day)
It seems that ARL is broken at siilicon level, doubt they can fix it in new microcode in any significant way. Maybe this is caused pairing MTL SOC wuth ARL compute tile, and they do not talk in efficient way ?
Intel now must make new revision with fixed silicon, or say godbay to some 20% of their CPU share, as gamers and many causal gamers won't buy it.

Can you also test ARL issues with drives ? It seems they broke that feature too.
https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/1grq7r2
 
Joined
Jun 20, 2024
Messages
402 (2.18/day)
It seems that ARL is broken at siilicon level, doubt they can fix it in new microcode in any significant way. Maybe this is caused pairing MTL SOC wuth ARL compute tile, and they do not talk in efficient way ?
Intel now must make new revision with fixed silicon, or say godbay to some 20% of their CPU share, as gamers and many causal gamers won't buy it.

Can you also test ARL issues with drives ? It seems they broke that feature too.
https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/1grq7r2
Surprisingly they still haven't appreciably dropped the pricing of it much since launch.... I suspect once the next few updates come that'll probably be the thing that drives the performance up noticably or forces the price to drop to levels where it starts to get some market share.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
1,429 (0.36/day)
Processor 11900K
Motherboard ASRock Z590 OC Formula
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 using 2x140mm 3000RPM industrial Noctuas
Memory G. Skill Trident Z 2x16GB 3600MHz
Video Card(s) eVGA RTX 3090 FTW3
Storage 2TB Crucial P5 Plus
Display(s) 1st: LG GR83Q-B 1440p 27in 240Hz / 2nd: Lenovo y27g 1080p 27in 144Hz
Case Lian Li Lancool MESH II RGB (I removed the RGB)
Audio Device(s) AKG Q701's w/ O2+ODAC (Sounds a little bright)
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 850 TX
Mouse Glorious Model D
Keyboard Glorious MMK2 65% Lynx MX switches
Software Win10 Pro
How is single threading a solid approach? Applications are multi thread aware and (hopefully) optimised as time passes. The age of monolithic dies is done.

Intel deserves all of the flak for an ass of a launch, and I have no idea why a true IT professional would be gung-ho for a company with absolute clustercuss launches. (Alder Lake, Degradation of 13/14th Gen, corrosion, Spectre/Meltdown?)
I believe they are talking about hyperthreading.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
301 (2.01/day)
System Name AM4_TimeKiller
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600X @ all-core 4.7 GHz
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B550-E Gaming
Cooling Arctic Freezer II 420 rev.7 (push-pull)
Memory G.Skill TridentZ RGB, 2x16 GB DDR4, B-Die, 3800 MHz @ CL14-15-14-29-43 1T, 53.2 ns
Video Card(s) ASRock Radeon RX 7800 XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 990 PRO 1 TB, Kingston KC3000 1 TB, Kingston KC3000 2 TB
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-850
Mouse Logitech wireless mouse
Keyboard Logitech wireless keyboard
How about memory latency - has it improved?

This sucks so badly. Nowadays one must be extremely careful about OS version they want to use with newest hardware.

So they improved Arrow Lake on 24H2 ONLY.

Good lord, what a year for hardware.
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
99 (0.03/day)
Processor Ryzen 5600X
Motherboard MSI B450i
Cooling CM MasterLiquid Lite 120
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) EVGA 3060 Ti
Storage Kingston A2000 NVMe
Display(s) ViewSonic VX2758A-2K-PRO
Case SilverStone SG13
Audio Device(s) O2+ODAC
Power Supply Corsair RMx 550W
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Keychron K7
Software W10 Pro
Joined
May 13, 2024
Messages
8 (0.04/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard MSI Pro B550M-VC Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill RipJaws DDR4-3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus DUAL OC RTX 4070 Super
Storage 4TB NVME, 2TB SATA SSD, 4TB SATA HDD
Display(s) Dell S2722DGM 27" Curved VA 1440p 165hz
Case Fractal Design Pop Air MIni
Power Supply Corsair RMe 750W 80+ Gold
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard GMMK TKL RGB Black
VR HMD Oculus Quest 2
How is single threading a solid approach? Applications are multi thread aware and (hopefully) optimised as time passes. The age of monolithic dies is done.

Intel deserves all of the flak for an ass of a launch, and I have no idea why a true IT professional would be gung-ho for a company with absolute clustercuss launches. (Alder Lake, Degradation of 13/14th Gen, corrosion, Spectre/Meltdown?)

Moving back to single-threaded cores doesn't hurt multi-thread applications. SMT was introduced to improve performance when CPUs were a single core, and then to improve thread count when core count was low because Intel was stuck on large processes. Now that we have advanced processes and can fit dozens of cores on a single CPU, Intel has shown they can get much better results by carefully optimizing smaller, single-threaded cores instead of wasting space on the components needed for SMT. Just look at the benchmarks. It matches the 9950X in multi-thread Blender rendering and bests it in Cinebench multi-thread, despite having 8 less threads and most of its cores running significantly slower than the full cores on the 9950X.

Every company has bad launches. Just look at the review for the initial Ryzen 7 1800X. https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-1800x/16.html It had many of the same problems Arrow Lake has. Poor game performance with new architecture, apps/OS needed to be optimized for the dual-CCD design, etc. I'm not saying Arrow Lake is great, if you just look at performance it's a sidegrade to Rapter Lake and Zen 5. I'm saying the new architecture is the right direction. I will not be surprised when AMD follows suite with single-threading cores and big/little desktop CPUs in the next generation or two. It has obvious advantages to performance.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
96 (0.04/day)
Surprisingly they still haven't appreciably dropped the pricing of it much since launch.... I suspect once the next few updates come that'll probably be the thing that drives the performance up noticably or forces the price to drop to levels where it starts to get some market share.
ARL names 285, 265 and 245 suggest they knew it is broken and won't be true successor for Raptors X900, X700 and X600. Maybe they do quick revision with fixed perf and names 290, 270 and 260.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,840 (1.73/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name stress-less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI PRO B650M-A Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6400 1:1 CL30-36-36-76 FCLK 2200
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
ARL names 285, 265 and 245 suggest they knew it is broken and won't be true successor for Raptors X900, X700 and X600. Maybe they do quick revision with fixed perf and names 290, 270 and 260.
This logic makes sense, so therefore there is very little chance Intel marketing thought like this when naming the chips. :D

This is an intelligent retroactive rationalization, though.
 
Top