3DMark Vantage Compilation

[sneekypeet]

Na don't sell them, it's is really similar performance. I noticed even when you do hear the fan it's not annoying . It just sounds like rushing air. The voltage control is not working on my 480 gtx yet but it will soon.
trt740|GALAXY GTX480|771/1542/1029|21920|AMD PHII X6 4.0GHZ


http://img.techpowerup.org/100508/testing.jpg

Nice score Trt. Are you using after burner for OC'ing. There is a box in the settings to enable voltage control, then just move the slider

 

[trt740]

Nice score Trt. Are you using after burner for OC'ing. There is a box in the settings to enable voltage control, then just move the slider

yep using it and the box is checked

 

[sneekypeet]

1.6.0 beta 5?

 

[Assassin48]

here is a tool thats been release for the open public i guess.

Its Msi AB Extreme
You can push more voltage through the card then the regular one.
You should read the first post before you download it

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=7275

again use at own risk

 

[TheMailMan78]

I just installed a 1090T Ill be updating my benches soon.

 

[trt740]

1.6.0 beta 5?

yes thats the one

 

[sneekypeet]

try his beta6 (extreme) links. Didnt add any more volts for my 470, but it may pick it up for the 480

Also trt, when I had the beta5 it said beta5 on the HUD for Afterburner...I dont thing urs is the beta Even now with the Xtreme mine shows 1.6.0x beta6 in the bottom right corner

 

[trt740]

try his beta6 (extreme) links. Didnt add any more volts for my 470, but it may pick it up for the 480

Also trt, when I had the beta5 it said beta5 on the HUD for Afterburner...I dont thing urs is the beta

I was using beta 1.6 but the extreme version that was just posted does work

 

[Assassin48]

I was using beta 1.6 but the extreme version that was just posted does work

of course it works

Its been floating around for a long time now, just wasn't able to post it up.

EDIT*
DON'T USE IT IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING!

 

[sneekypeet]

of course it works

Its been floating around for a long time now, just wasn't able to post it up

SO is there tweaks for more voltage, or if you dont get any on the slider you are SOL?

 

[Assassin48]

SO is there tweaks for more voltage, or if you dont get any on the slider you are SOL?

Did you go to settings and checked Enable Voltage Control ?

uninstall the public AB then install the extreme if your having problems

 

[sneekypeet]

Ok got it in correctly, but alass, still no more volts for me. I did have a look at the readme file, it shows all the same volts as the last version, even for the 480. There has to be a trick to getting more?!?!

 

[t_ski]

have you tryed 4000 ?

No, that's the NB strap, correct?

 

[trt740]

all I can say is wow!!!

trt740|GALAXY GTX480|852/1704/1040|23924|AMD PHII X6 4.25ghz On water nothing could touch these I bet you could game near 900 on them. On air in my closed case this is the best I could do.
Oh also anyone who says a AMD cpu is a bottle neck is a moron. FYI say goodbye to a geat card my XFX 5870 just sold.

 

[DOM]

trt740|GALAXY GTX480|852/1704/1040|23924|AMD PHII X6 4.25ghz On water nothing could touch these I bet you could game near 900 on them. On air in my closed case this is the best I could do.
Oh also anyone who says a AMD cpu is a bottle neck is a moron. FYI say goodbye to a geat card my XFX 5870 just sold.http://img.techpowerup.org/100508/480 gtx.jpg

nice oc on the card

can you run one with out PhysX ?

 

[LiveOrDie]

LiveOrDie|EVGA GTX480SC|850/1050/1700|24927|i7 920@3.8Ghz

 

[Wile E]

trt740|GALAXY GTX480|852/1704/1040|23924|AMD PHII X6 4.25ghz On water nothing could touch these I bet you could game near 900 on them. On air in my closed case this is the best I could do.
Oh also anyone who says a AMD cpu is a bottle neck is a moron. FYI say goodbye to a geat card my XFX 5870 just sold.
http://img.techpowerup.org/100508/480 gtx.jpg

Sorry to say it Tom, but Live or Die's score just above me kind of proves otherwise. Almost the same card speeds but lower cpu clocks, and he has you by 1000 pts.

And Asylum has the #1 480 score, with a lower clocked card on his 980X.

X6 is still an awesome cpu tho, but it is still a bottleneck in benching high end cards.

 

[TheMailMan78]

Sorry to say it Tom, but Live or Die's score just above me kind of proves otherwise. Almost the same card speeds but lower cpu clocks, and he has you by 1000 pts.

And Asylum has the #1 480 score, with a lower clocked card on his 980X.

X6 is still an awesome cpu tho, but it is still a bottleneck in benching high end cards.

But his CPU score is a 1000 less

 

[Wile E]

But his CPU score is a 1000 less

Yeah, from the Physx test only. Tom's Physx score is a lot higher. That only proves my point further, as the 1st cpu test, which does not use the card, but only the cpu, shows the i7 has a clear advantage.

The second test uses the card, and is effected very little by the cpu.

 

[LiveOrDie]

But his CPU score is a 1000 less

not any more
LiveOrDie|EVGA GTX480SC|850/1050/1700|2507|i7 920@3.8Ghz Turbo

 

[TheMailMan78]

not any more
LiveOrDie|EVGA GTX480SC|850/1050/1700|2507|i7 920@3.8Ghz Turbo

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/8616/turboon.jpg

Nice run!

 

[trt740]

Yeah, from the Physx test only. Tom's Physx score is a lot higher. That only proves my point further, as the 1st cpu test, which does not use the card, but only the cpu, shows the i7 has a clear advantage.

The second test uses the card, and is effected very little by the cpu.

What I was saying is the cpu doesn't bottle neck the gpu and has nothing to do with your statement. In pure muscle the intel chip are faster but for gaming AMD cpus don't bottle neck these gpus. Thats what I was saying. You would be better off with a phenom II 955 and a cheapo AMD motherboard and use the rest of the money to buy a better gpu if your a gamer because these AMD chips will not hold you back. I didn't say chip for chip they were faster. What I will say is in windows these AMD chip are faster or atleast they feel faster. Also I have crap ram (100.00 worth of dual channel ram), and only 4 gb of it, while he has 6 gb ( 275.00 worth of tripple channel) ram. I have a 95.00 motherboard and he has a 380.00+ motherboard. I think that adds up to a win for me. There is altleast a 460.00+ difference in these two sysytems and to even mention my system in comparison to his is a feather in AMDs cap. I will take the difference and buy a even better gpu and kick his butt if need be or a bigger monitor.

 

[LiveOrDie]

What I was saying is the cpu doesn't bottle neck the gpu and has nothing to do with your statement. In pure muscle the intel chip are faster but for gaming AMD cpus don't bottle neck these gpus. Thats what I was saying. You would be better off with a phenom II 955 and a cheapo AMD motherboard and use the rest of the money to buy a better gpu if your a gamer because these AMD chips will not hold you back. I didn't say chip for chip they were faster. What I will say is in windows these AMD chip are faster or atleast they feel faster. Also I have crap ram (100.00 worth od dual channel), and only 4 gb of it while he has 6 gb ( 275.00 worth of tripple channel) of much better ram and I have a 95.00 motherboard and he has a 380.00+ motherboard. I think that adds up to a win for me. There is altleast a 460.00+ difference in these two sysytems and to even mention my system in comparison to his is a feather in AMDs cap. I will take the difference and buy a even better gpu and kick his butt if need be or a bigger monitor.

yer right there but you never said any thing about games you posted it in a vantage thread so people are going to assumed you were taking about vintage, i dont own a AMD AM3 so i cant test how fast it is in windows but i think a i7 chip would still be faster because of HT.

 

[trt740]

Sorry to say it Tom, but Live or Die's score just above me kind of proves otherwise. Almost the same card speeds but lower cpu clocks, and he has you by 1000 pts.

And Asylum has the #1 480 score, with a lower clocked card on his 980X.

X6 is still an awesome cpu tho, but it is still a bottleneck in benching high end cards.

Again higher overclocked cpu, and more expensive, larger amount and better ram, plus a motherboard thats more than 3 times the cost of mine.

 

[trt740]

yer right there but you never said any thing about games you posted it in a vantage thread so people are going to assumed you were taking about vintage, i dont own a AMD AM3 so i cant test how fast it is in windows but i think a i7 chip would still be faster because of HT.

Not sure what you are talking about vantage is mainly GPU benchmark, (8 gpu tests) with some cpu testing thrown in(2 cpu tests). Also I have used both and AMD is snappier in Windows I cannot tell you why but it feels that way.