• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

3DMark Vantage Compilation

Whilst that is indeed true, some games do actually have Physx so if it's there then use it. It's just like Creative's EAX, if you got hardware that supports certain features in certain games, then there's nothing wrong with having a piece of hardware that can give a boost when needed. If you don't like it, keep it to yourself, you and your opinions are not gonna stop NVIDIA making cards with PhysX or stop game developers integrating it into whatever games they see fit. Asylum allows it and he created this thread, so get over it. I'm sure by now if he would be swayed into taking scores off for having PhysX enabled then it would have been done, but it hasn't. Like it or lump it, it's here to stay, so hahahaha.
 
hres my mine ati 5870 with gt240 physx, cpu validation at sig also and will post non physx nextime

vantage.jpg
 
Last edited:
SabreWulf69 said:
Whilst that is indeed true, some games do actually have Physx so if it's there then use it. It's just like Creative's EAX, if you got hardware that supports certain features in certain games, then there's nothing wrong with having a piece of hardware that can give a boost when needed. If you don't like it, keep it to yourself, you and your opinions are not gonna stop NVIDIA making cards with PhysX or stop game developers integrating it into whatever games they see fit. Asylum allows it and he created this thread, so get over it. I'm sure by now if he would be swayed into taking scores off for having PhysX enabled then it would have been done, but it hasn't. Like it or lump it, it's here to stay, so hahahaha.
Click to expand...
Huh... why the demeaning reply kiddo?

Anyway THIS hasnt happened is all. I will shut up though. :)
 
Last edited:
Far out, all I need now is some LN2

SabreWulf69|EVGA GTX285|754/1320/1700|16957|C2D E8400@4.51GHz

Comparitively_Better_Than_All.jpg
 
EarthDog said:
Huh... why the demeaning reply kiddo?

Anyway THIS hasnt happened is all. I will shut up though. :)
Click to expand...

what front page are you looking at? I see all of that there.
 
Yeah, its there. Im just a complete horse's ass. Sorry guys.

I guess nobody from the Nvidia camp decided to run without PhysX and that threw me off... :shadedshu :D
 
Last edited:
Heh, epic fail, we have it, you's don't. Tsk tsk tsk. Spend some money and invest naughty, naughty, naughty, cheapo ATI. Obviously I know I ain't a business, but still, at least shares would go a long way in PhysX when knowing fair well as an NVIDIA fanboy that the competition is in the lead that more research and maybe in the next product or not worrying about how much profit for once they are making all together over the competition.

Don't get to cocky though, smart business skills and improve over yourself first and foremost to keep the competition away when your ahead to keep in the game. Should be interesting how all through recent history companies seem to get to cocky then not do anything about improvements for the sake of improvements sorry to rant but yeah, if they concentrated then maybe they'd always stay ahead. Also unfortunately with the sides I'm backing and when they are behind they still don't lower their prices unlike "my" competition *cough* NVIDIA *cough* Intel.

*Blah blah blah* lol
 
Last edited:
EarthDog said:
Because its not accepted at the ORB or Hwbot and doesnt portray a realistic result when comparing ATI to Nvidia or games without PhysX.

For example, someone comes on here and sees that a GTX260 216 is beating out a HD5850 in vantage b/c physx was enabled, then goes and gets a 260 216 only to be spanked around by games without PhsyX....

Another thing to mention is that it boosts the CPU score, not GPU score.

PhysX when enabled in games without a dedicated physx card, the FPS DROP, while in this benchmark the results are better.



Shall I go on? :) (sorry for being so bitter about this)
Click to expand...
Anybody that buys a card based purely on a Vantage or Physx benchmark score deserves what they get. It's only misleading to people that do not do their homework.

This thread isn't exactly a competition, it's just a compilation of scores, thus we don't mind the Physx scores being in there. We aren't competing for anything.

Although, I would like to see more non-Physx runs anyway.

SabreWulf69 said:
Heh epic fail we have it you's don't tsk tsk tsk spend some money and invest naughty naughty naughty cheapo ATI, obviously I ain't a business but still at least shares would go a long way when still an NVIDIA fanboy and knowing the competition is in the lead more research and maybe a next product or not worrying about how much profit for once they are making all together over the competition don't get to cocky though smart business skills and improve over yourself first and foremost to keep the competition away when your ahead to keep on the game. Should be interesting how all through recent history companies seem to get to cocky then not do anything about sorry to rant but yeah, if they concentrated then maybe they'd stay ahead but unfortunately with the sides I'm backing and when they are behind they don't lower their prices unlike "my" competition *cough* NVIDIA *cough* Intel.
Click to expand...
Holy wall of text. How about making this readable? You know, with things like punctuation, and paragraphs and shit.
 
Sorry DP but hres mine with and w/o PhysX


with PhysX
vantage.jpg



without PhysX
nonphysx794.jpg
 
Edited above for a slight bit more legibility.
 
score update at 4ghz finally :D not much of an increase from 3.9ghz but i like the fact that i finaly got my cpu to clock over 3.9 and i want to show it on here

Crushgate|GTX470|820/850/1640|21597|PII 965c3@ 4.02Ghz

4ghz vantage score FINALLY.jpg
 
Last edited:
Heres a new best by me.

Asylum|EVGA GTX 480|920/1107/1839|29343|i7 980X@4.4Ghz

480-v.jpg
 
Nice run Asylum; and nice clocks on that 480:toast:
 
Wow, very good Asylum. o.O Very nice clocks :-D
 
mlee49 said:
What voltage does your card need for those clocks? Also do you use MSI AB? Just curious if you've tried Evga Eleet.
Click to expand...

I use Evga Eleet and Precission.

My card only needs 1.13 volts to reach 920mhz on the core with water cooling.

Cant get it to be stable any higher than that no matter how many volts i give it.
 
very nice :D
 
this will be the last submit ill be doing for a while i think iv gotten all i can out of my system :D

Crushgate|GTX470|840/850/1680|21918|PII 965c3@ 4.02Ghz

vantage test 5.jpg
 
Vantage Stock.jpg


Stock run, Just got Win 7 the other day. Will O/C a bit and put up CPU Z and GPU Z shots in that one.
 
w physx

Earthdog|Galaxy GTX 470|825/1650/1800|23588|i7 860@ 4Ghz

w o physx

Earthdog|Galaxy GTX 470|825/1650/1800|20558|i7 860@ 4Ghz
 

Attachments

  • tpuvantage23588.jpg
    tpuvantage23588.jpg
    201.2 KB · Views: 486
  • vantage20558.jpg
    vantage20558.jpg
    205.7 KB · Views: 628
ZenZimZaliben|Asus HD5870|1080/1300|23105|i7 930 @ 4.3ghz

Please add me. :toast:

zzz.png


There is more to get out of this. Just need to mod the watercooler a little more.

edit- Damn just noticed I had CPUZ on the same screen. Other was supposed to be memory at 2050mhz...
 
New high score for me as well as low gpu temps:)

HammerON|EVGA GTX 470 SLI|840/920|38492|i7 920@4.16GHz

Capture115696.jpg
 
I can't see. Too many programs open...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top