• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Announces Press Conference at CES 2025

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,202 (1.28/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 9800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X650I AX
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
If a studio plans to release game that is meant to be played with DLSS/FSR/XeSS, it may be taken into account when graphics assets are being made for the game. There's no point in putting extra effort to work out ultra fine textures or other graphics materials, because god only knows how that particular upscaling algorithm will render that particular pixel in that particular situation. It may look totally different than original. Look at Wukong screenshots. That game is extremely taxy on GPU and basically unplayable without upscaling, while many other games look better (at least texture-wise) and offer much smoother gameplay on native.
All I can say here is I strongly disagree, I've never found upscaling (most notably DLSS) to alter the image in any significant way from the beginning, no difference to assets or textures, no alteration to the art or style and feel of the game at all. Native is such an arbitrary term too, as it applies uniquely to every monitor. For example take running a game on a steam deck at 1280x800, then on a 4k monitor using DLSS quality, the 800p "Native" presentation sure ain't going to look better, or more authentic, not from the heap of testing and experience I have at least. Like you say however this might be taken into account during development when a game intends to ship with upscaling options, which most AAA/heavy games do anyway.

I've always subscribed to the notion that what the developer wants is for everyone to get the best possible experience playing their game, there's no one size fits all config or way to run it 'as the devs meant for it to be played' - they give you as many options as possible so that from steam decks to halo part builds we can all enjoy it the best we can.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
610 (1.77/day)
Location
Seattle
System Name DevKit
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600 ↗4.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus WiFi
Cooling Koolance CPU-300-H06, Koolance GPU-180-L06, SC800 Pump
Memory 4x16GB Ballistix 3200MT/s ↗3800
Video Card(s) PowerColor RX 580 Red Devil 8GB ↗1380MHz ↘1105mV, PowerColor RX 7900 XT Hellhound 20GB
Storage 240GB Corsair MP510, 120GB KingDian S280
Display(s) Nixeus VUE-24 (1080p144)
Case Koolance PC2-601BLW + Koolance EHX1020CUV Radiator Kit
Audio Device(s) Oculus CV-1
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts EA-750 Semi-Modular
Mouse Easterntimes Tech X-08, Zelotes C-12
Keyboard Logitech 106-key, Romoral 15-Key Macro, Royal Kludge RK84
VR HMD Oculus CV-1
Software Windows 10 Pro Workstation, VMware Workstation 16 Pro, MS SQL Server 2016, Fan Control v120, Blender
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R15: 1590cb Cinebench R20: 3530cb (7.83x451cb) CPU-Z 17.01.64: 481.2/3896.8 VRMark: 8009
Devs tend to set things up for their environment as the intended bare minimum, justifying that by launch day, that system will likely be far obsolete compared to their audience. I know this because it's what I do for world building and what others deal with in heavy modeling. One step at a time.
 
Top