DarkMatter
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2007
- Messages
- 1,714 (0.27/day)
| Processor | Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now) |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q-E |
| Cooling | Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu |
| Memory | 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15 |
| Video Card(s) | GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory |
| Storage | 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0 |
| Display(s) | HP p1130, 21" Trinitron |
| Case | Antec p180 |
| Audio Device(s) | Creative X-Fi PLatinum |
| Power Supply | 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency |
| Software | Windows XP |
WOW against such a methodical reply what can I say? 
Well I was asking if there was another chipset as I didn't knew if there was any. Even though after a second read I must admit my question looks rhetorical.
I neither knew the existance of the mobile version, see, I thought they used the same. All my next comments were derived from this, so what can I say...
As of when talking about smaller devices I was refering to smaller ones. That's why I introduced Tegra. As I said it's because I don't like the small EeePC and similars. For me there's no place for anything between a full featured PC and iPhone/Touch-like devices. But that's just me, I recognize that other people want such things, so I withdraw what was said.
Oh and the 50/55 watts was about a desktop/media center PC. Again the lack of knowledge about the mobile chipset, made me think Atom was not really ready (not more than a Celeron) for ultra-mobile devices. I don't know anything about the Eee anyway, just the specs overview.
Well I was asking if there was another chipset as I didn't knew if there was any. Even though after a second read I must admit my question looks rhetorical.
I neither knew the existance of the mobile version, see, I thought they used the same. All my next comments were derived from this, so what can I say...
As of when talking about smaller devices I was refering to smaller ones. That's why I introduced Tegra. As I said it's because I don't like the small EeePC and similars. For me there's no place for anything between a full featured PC and iPhone/Touch-like devices. But that's just me, I recognize that other people want such things, so I withdraw what was said.
Oh and the 50/55 watts was about a desktop/media center PC. Again the lack of knowledge about the mobile chipset, made me think Atom was not really ready (not more than a Celeron) for ultra-mobile devices. I don't know anything about the Eee anyway, just the specs overview.