- Joined
- Oct 10, 2009
- Messages
- 805 (0.14/day)
- Location
- Madrid, Spain
System Name | Rectangulote 2 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Gaming B650-PLUS |
Cooling | Alphacool Eisbaer Pro Aurora 360 + 240 ST30 |
Memory | 64 GB DDR5 6000mhz Corsair Vengeance |
Video Card(s) | Asus TUF Gaming RTX 4090 OC |
Storage | 3 x WD Black SN-850X 1TB |
Display(s) | 2 x Asus ROG Swift PG278QR / LG C4 |
Case | Corsair 5000D Airflow |
Audio Device(s) | Evga Nu Audio + Beyerdynamic DT 150 + Trust GTX 258 |
Power Supply | Corsair RMX1000 |
Mouse | Razer Naga Wireless Pro |
Keyboard | Keychron K4 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
The more time passes, the more I'm convinced this was just a stupid rat race started by nvidia and ati did just add fuel to the fire. Nvidia did had to come up with an exotic tech derived from 3dfx and promised double performance in a time they needed to push hard because there was a lot of competition. But the basis of the idea means that in the end you just had to wait to second market to lower prices to get double performance, something card makers that have to roll new products every x months can't allow because of investors' fury.
A stunt that worked for maybe 3-5 years. If there was a real intention to push that tech to a point like nowadays multiple cpu cores are used or cuda, then we would have it more developed by now, and probably multi brand by microsoft.
A stunt that worked for maybe 3-5 years. If there was a real intention to push that tech to a point like nowadays multiple cpu cores are used or cuda, then we would have it more developed by now, and probably multi brand by microsoft.