- Joined
- Aug 16, 2005
- Messages
- 27,218 (3.83/day)
- Location
- Alabama
System Name | RogueOne |
---|---|
Processor | Xeon W9-3495x |
Motherboard | ASUS w790E Sage SE |
Cooling | SilverStone XE360-4677 |
Memory | 128gb Gskill Zeta R5 DDR5 RDIMMs |
Video Card(s) | MSI SUPRIM Liquid X 4090 |
Storage | 1x 2TB WD SN850X | 2x 8TB GAMMIX S70 |
Display(s) | 49" Philips Evnia OLED (49M2C8900) |
Case | Thermaltake Core P3 Pro Snow |
Audio Device(s) | Moondrop S8's on schitt Gunnr |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime TX-1600 |
Mouse | Razer Viper mini signature edition (mercury white) |
Keyboard | Monsgeek M3 Lavender, Moondrop Luna lights |
VR HMD | Quest 3 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro Workstation |
Benchmark Scores | I dont have time for that. |
Worse comparison made of all time.
Why exactly? Im curious because at the moment only flag ship cards costing several hundred dollars a piece in multi GPU configurations can sustain the FPS necessary to play most popular games at high detail levels. This makes it impractical for the norm not to mention it simply hasn't been pushed hard enough to be much more than a novelty item for the market. Likewise while current GPUS including flag ships have DP outputs most of these connections coincide with the high resolution high Hz monitors they would "look best on". However Monitors in even high price segments are still made with even VGA which as outdated as it is is still used in the majority of affordable monitors and TVs. DVI didn't even manage to take its crown.
I would like your input on why exactly 4k gaming and DP only GPUs are not only somehow superior for all intensive purposes in today's saturated 1080p market but also why you might think the market is full enough of these products to warrent such a change from DVI?
I will ask @EarthDog as well. Reviewing aside of course. I did that as well and consumerism and elitism are very different things.