• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD FX 8120 Listed on Ukrainian Store

btarunr

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,668 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Specs
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Less than a week ahead of its launch, a Ukrainian online store named Fixer started listing the AMD FX 8120 eight-core processor PIB (FD8120FRGUBOX). The store is listing the FX 8120 at 1791 UAH (US $223.5). According to the source, FX 8120 stocks arrived at Fixer's warehouse on the 5th of this month, and the product is listed since. The variant listed is the one with 95W TDP, there is a 125W TDP variant, too. It remains to be seen how the two variants spread across distribution channels. The FX 8120 is based on the Bulldozer micro-architecture, it features 8 cores, 16 MB total cache, and a nominal clock speed of 3.1 GHz (which can go up to 4 GHz with TurboCore). A worldwide launch of the AMD FX Processor family is expected on October 12.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
95 Watt part is pos to be the 2012 version ugh!!
 
OMG just gimme my Bulldozer O_O
 
IvTK said:
Benchmark & OC
http://forum.overclockers.ua/viewtopic.php?uid=2&f=2&t=42451

This is FX-8120 CPU from another store. Incredible!
Click to expand...

LOL they took his picture so the score looks more creditable
file.php
 
treehouse said:
those numbers mean nothing to me, did it perform well?
Click to expand...

That SuperPi result is like of a Pentium II or something.

It can't take 102 seconds for BD @ 4.8GHz to finish SuperPi 1M. Because i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz takes only 8 seconds to finish SuperPi 1M.

I'm confused. Am I missing something? :wtf:
 
Exactly. This cant be true, becouse if it is, it is a big FAIL. I can do 8M runs faster than that.

Linx test only 35gflops, this is seriously weak, even for a Intel specific test. Also 1.5v for 4.6ghz overclock. Seriously, this better not be real.
 
Last edited:
First, I don't care how it performs with dead instruction sets.

Second, This guy can't be the only enthusiast in the Ukraine that would have one on forums if this was already shipping.
 
Its not shipping to customers according to the article, it is shop stock, waiting till NDA lift. But hey, we will know very soon.
 
True. I've waited this long, 5 more days for something official isn't going to kill me.
 
Ghost said:
That SuperPi result is like of a Pentium II or something.

It can't take 102 seconds for BD @ 4.8GHz to finish SuperPi 1M. Because i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz takes only 8 seconds to finish SuperPi 1M.

I'm confused. Am I missing something? :wtf:
Click to expand...

You missed the fact that superPi is based on ancient code (x87). Good read: http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/569964-superpi-1m-32m-nope.html

SuperPi is an antiquated benchmark that assesses core performance using an antiquated fpu x87 instruction set. It is a grossly inefficient computer program that uses floating point units to calculate pi and "evaluate" processor cache performance. It's not by any means a "real world" reflection of todays modern cpu's microarch capabilities. It's like running a horse(fpu x87 instructions) down today's paved interstate(the cpu hardware), when all the while a car(newer simd's) are available.
Click to expand...
 
does the fact that it says 'mod' in the super pi window title mean anything, might be a modded test hence the strange result na?
 
treehouse said:
does the fact that it says 'mod' in the super pi window title mean anything, might be a modded test hence the strange result na?
Click to expand...

No, it's just so that you get a result that isn't rounded to the nearest second.
 
repman244 said:
You missed the fact that superPi is based on ancient code (x87). Good read: http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/569964-superpi-1m-32m-nope.html
Click to expand...

Nah, I knew that. It's something else. SuperPi doesn't reflect real CPU performance, yet still the difference between AMD and Intel CPUs should be much smaller. So this whole thing smells fake.

According to DonanimHaber, BD gets about 20 secs @ SuperPi 1M. And that is a lot more realistic result.

Anyway, here are some other benches. They seem to be a lot more legit, IMHO http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?t=273986
 
heky said:
Exactly. This cant be true, becouse if it is, it is a big FAIL. I can do 8M runs faster than that.

Linx test only 35gflops, this is seriously weak, even for a Intel specific test. Also 1.5v for 4.6ghz overclock. Seriously, this better not be real.
Click to expand...

I see 4.8 with 1.52v and afaik later cpus from amd with improved yields oc better with much lower votage.
 
It's funny how it's usually these out of the way places no one's heard of which list new pre-NDA lifted stuff first. And it's not even in English.
 
if you want i can translate everything from that site :)
all results we can see may be this evening or tomorrow morning
also some people think that man need to update bios because of some unreal results e.x. 32gflops in linX:)
 
dickobrazzz said:
if you want i can translate everything from that site :)
all results we can see may be this evening or tomorrow morning
also some people think that man need to update bios because of some unreal results e.x. 32gflops in linX:)
Click to expand...

Yeah, translation would be great - I bet it'll get tongues wagging! :)
 
To everyone posting BS about BD. THERE IS NO FX-8130P. There is no FX processor with a "P" in its name. Any and everything you post about this processor that does not exist is BS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top