AMD Makes Gains in GPU Shipments in Q2-2019: Jon Peddie Research

[vega22]

Is this news or an advertisement?

Either way they can get fucked at five and a half grand for 4 reports a year.

 

[1d10t]

Hey btarunr, that graph seem off, are that RTX On ?

 

[RoutedScripter]

Who the hell makes such charts mixing discrete with integrated graphics, totally invalid.

 

[Kapone33]

I'm quite astonished by the comments. :/

The reason why AMD beat Nvidia in this comparison is not their discrete GPUs (which are still rubbish and don't sell very well).

What planet do you live on? AMD GPUs are rubbish??? So the Rx 570, 580, 590, 5700, 5700XT and Vega cards are all garbage (another word for rubbish) and BTW according to Amazon the RX 570/580 has the 3 of the top 5 sales. Maybe if you actually owned an AMD based GPU you would not make such an uninformed comment.

 

[Deleted member 158293]

Always interesting to see JPR's report teasers, and more accurate than Steam due to well documented issues with their reporting especially in Asian countries.

I would imagine this is probably near best case scenario to what AMD were expecting and kicks wide open the doors to the rest of their Navi launch products.

Now as AMD themselves keep repeating, they need to follow through and execute properly. The Navi mid-tier launch went very well for them even without AIB models added in yet.

 

[notb]

What planet do you live on? AMD GPUs are rubbish??? So the Rx 570, 580, 590, 5700, 5700XT and Vega cards are all garbage (another word for rubbish) and BTW according to Amazon the RX 570/580 has the 3 of the top 5 sales.

You must be one of those people who don't understand numbers and can't read graphs very well.
AMD has around 30% of discrete GPU share - that doesn't include CPU IGPs, but it includes laptops and Macs.
End of story.
Who cares how many Radeons are there in top5 on Amazon?
I bet you're also a fan of Mindfactory CPU sales figures. ;-)

Maybe if you actually owned an AMD based GPU you would not make such an uninformed comment.

You don't need to have an AMD GPU to know that you'd be happier with something from Nvidia. That's why reviews and benchmarks exist.
Similarly, you don't need to have AIDS to know it's worse than influenza. Someone has already checked.

Either way they can get fucked at five and a half grand for 4 reports a year.

The price is fairly normal. That's what consulting companies ask for this kind of standarized market research. It's fairly hard to make and there aren't that many buyers.

If millions of people wanted this kind of information, some publisher would do the same job and put the results in a $5 PC magazine.

Who the hell makes such charts mixing discrete with integrated graphics, totally invalid.

Why invalid?

Keep in mind that JPR makes this research for enterprises, not for gamers. You may not benefit, but someone surely does.

 

[Kapone33]

You must be one of those people who don't understand numbers and can't read graphs very well.
AMD has around 30% of discrete GPU share - that doesn't include CPU IGPs, but it includes laptops and Macs.
End of story.
Who cares how many Radeons are there in top5 on Amazon?
I bet you're also a fan of Mindfactory CPU sales figures. ;-)


I was not talking about the graphs. I was responding to the comment "AMD GPUs are rubbish". BTW AMD GPU share was 22% this time last year. Who cares about Radeons in top 5? Is not Amazon one of the top 3 online computer parts sales shops? If it included IGPs the share would be even higher as some of AMD's best sales are the 2200G and 2400G. It is obvious to me that you are someone that is biased against AMD for even mentioning the mindfactory. Oh well I guess I must be an AMD fanboy. So much so that I bought their stock at $4 when Ryzen was about to launch but who laughs hardest now, me at the stock at $31.25 per share. If that is not an indication of how well AMD is doing I don't know what is. We will always have those who think Nvidia is so much better than anything AMD has so is the 1060 faster than a RX580. Is the 5700XT slower than a 2070 (Not super)?

You don't need to have an AMD GPU to know that you'd be happier with something from Nvidia. That's why reviews and benchmarks exist.

Of course there have been no positive reviews for AMD GPUs and in benchmarks if an AMD GPU gives you 120 FPS and NVIDIA gives you 130 FPS on a 60HZ refresh screen how does that translate to being better? Yes the 2080TI is 30% faster than the 5700XT in most games but it is also $1400+ dollars in Canada vs $500+ for the 5700XT so almost 200% cost increase for 30% more performance....that is a smart move indeed

 

[Captain_Tom]

You don't need to have an AMD GPU to know that you'd be happier with something from Nvidia. That's why reviews and benchmarks exist.
Similarly, you don't need to have AIDS to know it's worse than influenza. Someone has already checked.

Why do I even poke my head into this fanboy den anymore? LOL wow.

This clown (1) says you will always be happier with Nvidia, and then (2) compares AMD to AIDS (and nvidia to the flu?!). Sorry I am just blown away by how logical and open-minded these arguments are...

You must be one of those people who don't understand numbers and can't read graphs very well.

Who cares how many Radeons are there in top5 on Amazon?
I bet you're also a fan of Mindfactory CPU sales figures. ;-)

Keep in mind that JPR makes this research for enterprises, not for gamers. You may not benefit, but someone surely does.

I love your sources count, but his don't. Again - brilliant brain right here arguing.

 

[notb]

I was not talking about the graphs. I was responding to the comment "AMD GPUs are rubbish". BTW AMD GPU share was 22% this time last year. Who cares about Radeons in top 5? Is not Amazon one of the top 3 online computer parts sales shops?

We have statistics for the whole market. Looking at a particular store makes no sense. Why can't you get it?

Also, for someone having over 900 posts on this forum, you're surprisingly bad at quoting. Please do it properly - it's hard to read your replies.

I love your sources count, but his don't. Again - brilliant brain right here arguing.

Yes, a market-wide research of GPU sales "counts more" than looking at a single store that supports one's hypothesis.

 

[medi01]

That's fine and we agree to disagree...

Just saying that this report and Steam hw survey counts a bit different use space and by that are not even very comparable. Their AIB board reports are more inline with what Steam tries to collect, but even with those are collecting different stats. Jon Peddie collect quantity of sold skus by quarters, steam collects it's user space hardware old and new...

And in speaking of AIB reports, AMD has raised quite bit market share on just released AIB board report, too. Great product with great price sell.
View attachment 130387

Curios that even in discrete GPU market it is 2 to 1 and not what one would think, looking at Steam reports.

 

[notb]

Curios that even in discrete GPU market it is 2 to 1 and not what one would think, looking at Steam reports.

2:1 ratio is for desktop discrete GPUs.
Gaming notebooks are dominated by Nvidia.
This alone likely takes us close to the 5:1 on the Steam survey.

On top of that you have minor effects:
Mac's are AMD exclusive and hardly ever used for games.
AMD used to be more popular in poorer countries, where Steam is not used as much.
etc

 

[Vayra86]

Its not so hard guys, Intel has the lion's share and this is not a place for bickering over 'AMD won something GPUish or not'... the gist of the article here is that after a loooong decline, AMD is showing gains again.

Another fact is that those gains are taken from Intel. We're looking at Ryzen's success here more than anything else, and this has zero value wrt how GPUs are popular or not...

 

[ValenOne]

2:1 ratio is for desktop discrete GPUs.
Gaming notebooks are dominated by Nvidia.
This alone likely takes us close to the 5:1 on the Steam survey.

On top of that you have minor effects:
Mac's are AMD exclusive and hardly ever used for games.
AMD used to be more popular in poorer countries, where Steam is not used as much.
etc

Your "gaming notebook" argument is a red herring to

Also, Vega 10 mobile beats MX130 and nearly MX150, rivals DDR3 MX150 variants.

Vega 8 mobile beats MX130.

You must be one of those people who don't understand numbers and can't read graphs very well.
AMD has around 30% of discrete GPU share - that doesn't include CPU IGPs, but it includes laptops and Macs.
End of story.

Vega IGPs are not exlusive to desktop PCs.
Vega GL with Intel CPUs are not AIB PCI-E add-on cards, IGP with VRAM chip by MCM.

 

[medi01]

... the gist of the article here is that after a loooong decline, AMD is showing gains again.

Well, given how popular Steam's BS hardware surveys are, this actually IS news (AIB only):

 

[notb]

Your "gaming notebook" argument is a red herring to

Why?

Also, Vega 10 mobile beats MX130 and nearly MX150, rivals DDR3 MX150 variants.

Vega 8 mobile beats MX130.

So? How is it relevant here?

Vega IGPs are not exlusive to desktop PCs.

?
I just said that AMD's share is likely thanks to mobile.
What do you want...?

Vega GL with Intel CPUs are not AIB PCI-E add-on cards, IGP with VRAM chip by MCM.

How many laptops use AIB add-on cards?

Could you write another comment and rephrase what you wanted to say?
Because in that one there are just a few sentences - loosely connected with each other (let alone the thread...).