• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon HD 5870 1 GB GDDR5

D

Deleted member 67555

Guest
because they have trained hordes of people to digg their stuff .. nobody does it for tpu
I didn't Digg the Maximum Pc review and i must say TPU did a much better review(as always love the graphs)....But I'm not going to Digg any review That doesn't have an AMD Test setup, period..Yes i want to see the Intel test but there is no Brand comparison to go by here..These results only tell me this card rocks in a setup that's not similar to mine. If you do a review with an AMD setup I promise I'll digg it then..
Not to mention it would be nice to see a Stock clock to Oc comparison
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
734 (0.13/day)
Location
Golden, Colorado
System Name KAREN / EVA / GHOST
Processor Intel Core i7-950 / AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE / Core i5 3570k
Motherboard ASUS TUF Sabertooth X58 / DFI LP DK 790FXB-M2RSH / Asrock z77e-itx
Cooling Thermaltake Frio / Corsair Cooling™ Hydro Series H50 / Corsair Hydro Series H60
Memory Corsair Dominator 6GB DDR3 1600 / Corsair Dominator Quad2X4096-8500C5DF / G.SKILL Ripjaws Serie 1600
Video Card(s) XFX HD6950 CF unlocked /XFX HD5770 CF/ MSI R4890 Cyclone
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 60 WD Raptor X WD1500AHFD / Seagate Barracuda /Western Digital 80gb, Toshiba 1TB
Display(s) 2 Acer P215H 21.5 Widescreen / Acer S211HL 21.5 / HP 2009F 20inch
Case SILVERSTONE RAVEN RV02-BW / NZXT Phantom /Bitfenix Prodigy
Audio Device(s) On board / Philips MMS 321 - PC multimedia speakers
Power Supply Ultra X3 ULT40311 1000W / Cosair CMPSU-750TX 750W/ CORSAIR Gaming Series GS700 700W
Software Windows 7 64 bit / Windows 7 64 bit / Windows 7 64 bit
I didn't Digg the Maximum Pc review and i must say TPU did a much better review(as always love the graphs)....But I'm not going to Digg any review That doesn't have an AMD Test setup, period..Yes i want to see the Intel test but there is no Brand comparison to go by here..These results only tell me this card rocks in a setup that's not similar to mine. If you do a review with an AMD setup I promise I'll digg it then..
Not to mention it would be nice to see a Stock clock to Oc comparison

Would be nice to see what the power of 3 can do :toast: See if it really does gel together well.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
697 (0.11/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
Processor C2D E8400@3.9GHz (488x8, 1.4v :( )
Motherboard Abit IP35-E
Cooling Thermaltake Sonic Tower+120mm fan
Memory 2GB kingmax ddr1066@976MHz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) Radeon X1800GTO @700/1400MHz with Accelero S1+Glacialtech fancard
Storage 2xSeagate Barracuda 7200.10 160GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster 793s... just you laugh...
Case some Aplus case
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC888
Power Supply Chieftec 450W
Software Win7 x64
QUOTE:
Overclocking the memory on these cards is quite different from any other card so far. Normally you'd expect rendering errors or crashes, but not with these cards. Thanks to the new error correction algorithm in the memory controller, every memory error is just retransmitted until everything is fine. So once you exceed the "stable" clock frequency, memory errors will appear more often, get retransmitted, but the rendered output will still look perfectly fine. The only difference is that performance drops, the further you increase the clocks, the lower the performance gets. As a result a normal "artifact scanning" approach to memory overclocking on the HD 5800 Series will not work. You have to manually increase the clocks and observe the framerate until you find the point where performance drops.



So, you get a card with flawed memory and you don't even know it?
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.48/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
So, you get a card with flawed memory and you don't even know it?

Good catch, I had thought about the card overheating, or getting some current leakage, but I didn't thought about that. Certainly I don't know how would you know if it was working properly without something to compare and what's worse how would you demostrate in the store that is not working at it should in order to have a replacement.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,997 (6.72/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
This is hardly an AMD fault. It's propertiary technology and as such we cannot blame AMD for not supporting it. It would be like blaming NVIDIA back then for not supporting 3dfx Glide. They just can't because NVIDIA doesn't want them to support it. They want it to be exclusive to GeForce cards.

"Since the release of the 186 ForceWare drivers PhysX hardware acceleration is disabled when a non-NVIDIA graphics card is used. This decision has caused a backlash from the community"

http://www.ngohq.com/graphic-cards/16223-nvidia-disables-physx-when-ati-card-is-present.html
 

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,320 (1.29/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 9800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X650I AX
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
Good catch, I had thought about the card overheating, or getting some current leakage, but I didn't thought about that. Certainly I don't know how would you know if it was working properly without something to compare and what's worse how would you demostrate in the store that is not working at it should in order to have a replacement.

you'd hope that is the kind of testing done on each complete card before it is packaged and dispatched.... we can only hope, or consumers will need a standardized test (application) so they know their 5870 is in perfect working order.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,997 (6.72/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
it dont matter what card it is, its a matter that usually initial production will have some flaws, they have QA for a reason.
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,771 (0.94/day)
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name ---
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.00 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0, Hacked Bios F4.x
Cooling Silenx 4 pipe Tower cooler + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 3 x 120mm, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 16GB + Patriot Memory DDR3 1866 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage Inland 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD for OS, WDC Black - 2TB + 1TB Storage, Inland 480GB SSD - Games
Display(s) 3 x 1080P LCDs - Acer 25" + Acer 23" + HP 23"
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
great review W1z. Thanks.

Question: Is there a way to select say 2 video cards to compare results, like say 4850 and 5850? I will be going from 4850 to 5850 for sure and don't want to keep searching the cards in the ever growing list lol.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
3,887 (0.59/day)
Location
Northern Ontario Canada
Processor Ryzen 5700x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aero G R1.1 BiosF5g
Cooling Noctua NH-C12P SE14 w/ NF-A15 HS-PWM Fan 1500rpm
Memory Micron DDR4-3200 2x32GB D.S. D.R. (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
Video Card(s) AMD RX 6800 - Asus Tuf
Storage Kingston KC3000 1TB & 2TB & 4TB Corsair MP600 Pro LPX
Display(s) LG 27UL550-W (27" 4k)
Case Be Quiet Pure Base 600 (no window)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220-VB
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex V Gold Pro 850W ATX Ver2.52
Mouse Mionix Naos Pro
Keyboard Corsair Strafe with browns
Software W10 22H2 Pro x64
Eagerly awaiting the 5850 review with power consumtion and noise specs.....................zomg hurry :)
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
3,471 (0.58/day)
System Name Acer Aspire V3-771G-53218G75Maii
Processor Core i5 3210M (2,5-3,1Ghz)
Memory 8GB DDR3 SODIMM
Video Card(s) Geforce GT650M
Storage Samsung 830 256GB - 750GB Toshiba drive
Software Windows 7 x64 Home Premium (non-acer-bloatware)
Check the 5XXX discussion thread, some review links were posted on the last couple of pages.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.48/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
you'd hope that is the kind of testing done on each complete card before it is packaged and dispatched.... we can only hope, or consumers will need a standardized test (application) so they know their 5870 is in perfect working order.

All the cards are tested, but every now and then someone gets a defective card, with defective memory. That's unavoidable. It's normally easy to spot because you get artifacts when the memory is having errors, but error correction actively corrects those artifacts so you would be unable to discern, unless you knew exactly how a healthy card performed in your PC. It's not a very big problem for overclocking if you pay attention, but if it's bad out of the box...
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
1,825 (0.31/day)
Location
Slovenia
System Name Multiple - Win7, Win10, Kubuntu
Processor Intel Core i7 3820 OC@ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard Asus P9X79
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory Corsair Vengeance 32GB 1333MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire ATI Radeon RX 480 8GB
Storage Samsung SSD: 970 EVO 1TB, 2x870 EVO 250GB,860 Evo 250GB,850 Evo 250GB, WD 4x1TB, 2x2TB, 4x4TB
Display(s) Asus PB328Q 32' 1440p@75hz
Case Cooler Master CM Storm Trooper
Power Supply Corsair HX750, HX550, Galaxy 520W
Mouse Multiple, Razer Mamba Elite, Logitech M500
Keyboard Multiple - Lenovo, HP, Dell, Logitech
This would be , a general talk so to speak , not a response to anybody here, nor the review author.

I don't think high noise is a big factor for a minus sign , calling the card bad just by the noise and therefore the lower score.

People always seem to expect perfect stuff, but normal logic tells you that at that performance there's surely much heat , and having to have a quieter card with 85C is just not reasonable , first , I am not some fancy reviewer but this is just a standard here, it's not better if it's quieter for everyone , it's just that people are not used to such noise (read> mainstream people) and that the importance of temperatures is far greater than your spoiled ears. As a matter of fact , people who are not used to the noise , isn't it obvious , they're surely not long in the PC and gaming market or been working with it ... I don't know but I hate to see many people around other review sties on the web making this stupid noise buzz such a pain in the butt problem, They need to get used to it.

The biggest mistake is , why is review done with !DEFAULT? sethings , where the manual fan speed is not set , the automatic temp-speed will always not be enough to assure needs of every customer.

I do know there are people who find noise so bad, thus the reviews are pointing out towards this, but again , I don't see those people real PC gamers , maybe something more like weekend players , if they would actually know anything about CONFIGURING.

What is for certain , this noise buzz exploded a few years ago , when a lot of 12-16 year "wannabe gamer" newbies started using PCs in the 21 century. Spoiled children from today can afford a PC very early than I was able. Althought , I don't actually know what caused this noise boom , I am not amused by it definately.
A stupid one would not buy the card for JUST the noise. Noise is something least important in the industry and I don't know who the heck bring this EXCUSE up. Just to call a card bad?




This review , is well , much better than guru3d , and does , to me have very objective approach which is excelent , those noise remarks are okay , minor , a minus sign indeed , I'll comment on that an a few others , the noise mention is fairly reasonable and there seem to be a big deal in the review , the noise buzz and wprrying is far more heavy elsewhere(that's actually what is above about).

Cool , as I said , that minus points(cons) the card received , are well and truly fixable from instant you set your OWN config , but , have to say , I have never seen a review done just that , to explain just this , never mentioned, nor anything similar.
The point is , that cards receive bad points from a lot of SMALL and fixable problems these days, that's just how I feel , for the explanation I will use this review as an example.

So , in this case , we have:

* Not the best price/performance !
* Tends to be noisy under load #
* Not much overclocking potential on our sample !
* Long card, might not fit all cases #
* DirectX 11 won't be relevant for quite a while !
* No support for CUDA / PhysX #

! > are facts, those this are real and are very reasonable, yes DX 11 won't be so important for a while(but the green side was hit anyway :p) , also the "not best price/preformance" is also correct , basics define that you can't give a minus cause of price, better just costs more and it will not be vice versa. The other is also reasonable.

While the # marked are , to me somewhat unnecessary bad points, first of all , CUDA and Physx is Nvidia only , so I think this was , maybe written before it became nvidia-only stuff...
Long Card that might not fit in all cases , that is true and it will not fit into MANY cases afaik , however there is still a way , HECK not a mainstream one(that's the point) , just re-position your HDD higher ,then chop , cut , saw , whatever that part of HDD cage away so the card would fit ; You think I would buy a card , and at home would notice it doesn't fit, return it lol , and wait again, you're kidding , I would definitely make sure about everything blocking Her way. If you are more than mainstream , then you need to know how to improvise.
Noisy at load, yeah it is , it must be , but again , there is a so called ADVANCED way to force the fan to spin how you like , either faster , or slower , you should achieve maximum cooling and blowing your ears(sarcasm) , or maximum quietness deluxe and risk your hardware blowing up(not joke this time)

Hmh , will not blow anything , but what is the definitive fact , that when it's hotter it will always perform less and so is the lifetime. Basics , card won't last as long if being always around 70-80C.




Now ask your self, why would the card have to be warmer, why would they have to satisfy newbies while the hardware would not withstand the circumstances. 85C is a very high temp. I never get beyond 65. and the fan on the HD4870 is only at 35%-40% , crysis for example , I don't even hear the fan while playing , so that busts the "noise problem" right from the first place. The fan on the 5870 would just be even faster ,and it is , thus even louder. What did everybody expect?

Even basics of physics define this ,
More Performance > More power needed
More Power > More Heat
More Heat > More cooling needed
More cooling needed > More noise if Air cooling used
The more noise > those who are noobs , cry , while the gamers play the game.

Well anyways , I explained a whole lot on a small problem hah, but for the sake of it, it's just my opinion ; small like a mouse , but irritating as an elephant. :)
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
3,471 (0.58/day)
System Name Acer Aspire V3-771G-53218G75Maii
Processor Core i5 3210M (2,5-3,1Ghz)
Memory 8GB DDR3 SODIMM
Video Card(s) Geforce GT650M
Storage Samsung 830 256GB - 750GB Toshiba drive
Software Windows 7 x64 Home Premium (non-acer-bloatware)
-big story about fan noise-

For me, fan noise is a downer.
First off, a dual-slot cooler should be plenty enough to cool a card like this.
Second, a dual-slot cooler allows for placement of bigger (in this case thicker) fans than a single-slot cooler, which makes it possible to move more air at the same RPM.
Third, it's not so much the load noise, even though I don't like a jet engine next to me when I'm gaming. It's the noise the fan produces when you're at your desktop, watching a video or listening to music. A PC should be near-quiet in operation when I'm doing that.

Shoving the "blame" for noiseless computing to gamers is absolutely not true. If anything, it's due to the HTPC trend and mainly just people who want to do more with their PC than just game.

Then, you talk about reviews done at default settings. Of course they are done at default settings! Those are the settings each and every buyer of such a card will get when they plug it in and let 'er rip!

Sure, I know how to configure (plus, why would you have to be a "real gamer" to do that?) but still, when I know what the default settings are, I know from where I can start tweaking.

As for the negative points issue, I believe you take them too seriously. These are points someone should take into consideration before buying this card. If you put "good" against "bad", you won't get to a score of 9.5, so that should say something about the importance of those bad points.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,991 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
As for the negative points issue, I believe you take them too seriously. These are points someone should take into consideration before buying this card. If you put "good" against "bad", you won't get to a score of 9.5, so that should say something about the importance of those bad points.

exactly. the key word is consideration here. if it doesnt matter for you then ignore it.
 

Tatty_Two

Gone Fishing
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
25,952 (3.74/day)
Location
Worcestershire, UK
Processor Intel Core i9 11900KF @ -.080mV PL max @220w
Motherboard MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK
Cooling DeepCool LS520SE Liquid + 3 Phanteks 140mm case fans
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel Bdie @ 3600Mhz CL14 1.45v Gear 1
Video Card(s) Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC + 8% PL
Storage WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS)
Display(s) AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular
Software Win 11 Home x64
@ Thracken...... agree totally, lets not forget here, these GPU's are a smaller fabrication process therefore SHOULD run cooler, apart from that, I actually think that ATi/NVidia should not have a "reference" cooler for their GPU's, lets stop card manufacturers charging a premium for decent coolers that they design themselves, let them all contest for sales over the quality of their own hopefully innovated cooling designs, Sapphire manage to do it for it's Atomic, Toxic and VaporX cards and they are fantastic coolers so IMO no need to have these leaf blowing "reference" designs.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
3,471 (0.58/day)
System Name Acer Aspire V3-771G-53218G75Maii
Processor Core i5 3210M (2,5-3,1Ghz)
Memory 8GB DDR3 SODIMM
Video Card(s) Geforce GT650M
Storage Samsung 830 256GB - 750GB Toshiba drive
Software Windows 7 x64 Home Premium (non-acer-bloatware)
@ Thracken...... agree totally, lets not forget here, these GPU's are a smaller fabrication process therefore SHOULD run cooler, apart from that, I actually think that ATi/NVidia should not have a "reference" cooler for their GPU's, lets stop card manufacturers charging a premium for decent coolers that they design themselves, let them all contest for sales over the quality of their own hopefully innovated cooling designs, Sapphire manage to do it for it's Atomic, Toxic and VaporX cards and they are fantastic coolers so IMO no need to have these leaf blowing "reference" designs.

You have a point there, such a process would be nice and would certainly get some innovative products on the line.
If I remember correctly, at the time I bought my Club3D Geforce 5900XT, there were alot of different coolers on the market on the same card. Memory might fail me though.

But of course it's all about cost. Will you develop your own cooling standard or will you get a quick license from ATI/AMD or nVidia and slap a cooler on there of which you're already sure it will meet the specifications? Too bad that question is holding back several companies to come with better products.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,997 (6.72/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
majority of the ref design go into OEM machines, thats why they are produced first, just wait we will have non ref in a few months and TBH these units for the 4890 are good

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Productcompare.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010380048%20106792627%201067947106&bop=And&ActiveSearchResult=True&CompareItemList=N82E16814102852%2CN82E16814150438%2CN82E16814161299
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
1,825 (0.31/day)
Location
Slovenia
System Name Multiple - Win7, Win10, Kubuntu
Processor Intel Core i7 3820 OC@ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard Asus P9X79
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory Corsair Vengeance 32GB 1333MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire ATI Radeon RX 480 8GB
Storage Samsung SSD: 970 EVO 1TB, 2x870 EVO 250GB,860 Evo 250GB,850 Evo 250GB, WD 4x1TB, 2x2TB, 4x4TB
Display(s) Asus PB328Q 32' 1440p@75hz
Case Cooler Master CM Storm Trooper
Power Supply Corsair HX750, HX550, Galaxy 520W
Mouse Multiple, Razer Mamba Elite, Logitech M500
Keyboard Multiple - Lenovo, HP, Dell, Logitech
For me, fan noise is a downer.
First off, a dual-slot cooler should be plenty enough to cool a card like this.
Second, a dual-slot cooler allows for placement of bigger (in this case thicker) fans than a single-slot cooler, which makes it possible to move more air at the same RPM.
Third, it's not so much the load noise, even though I don't like a jet engine next to me when I'm gaming. It's the noise the fan produces when you're at your desktop, watching a video or listening to music. A PC should be near-quiet in operation when I'm doing that.

Shoving the "blame" for noiseless computing to gamers is absolutely not true. If anything, it's due to the HTPC trend and mainly just people who want to do more with their PC than just game.

Then, you talk about reviews done at default settings. Of course they are done at default settings! Those are the settings each and every buyer of such a card will get when they plug it in and let 'er rip!

Sure, I know how to configure (plus, why would you have to be a "real gamer" to do that?) but still, when I know what the default settings are, I know from where I can start tweaking.

As for the negative points issue, I believe you take them too seriously. These are points someone should take into consideration before buying this card. If you put "good" against "bad", you won't get to a score of 9.5, so that should say something about the importance of those bad points.

exactly. the key word is consideration here. if it doesnt matter for you then ignore it.



Right , my bad.

All right , but I wouldn't be so okay with default cooling , as I experienced my self , I wanted to test just that, I left my HD 3870 at default when I bought it , and it froze with screen corruption within 30 minutes. The game was not even so hard on it. It wasn't crysis i tested , but it was maxed out. Half of the problem is , default doesn't always keep it cool enough.

Indeed , for the noise in this example , we blame the reference cooler. Not that the card is bad , you can always upgrade the cooler or buy a vaporx or whatever upgraded stuff they later manufacture. Because the OEM/reference stuff will never be the best , thus there won't be a card with a score of 10 at release.

I do however agree with the most you proved and that the review is just a consideration , but you have to know , I think that a lot of people buy stuff how they see reviews at glance , this is bad , usually it's the green side who has a little more fps , but that's not the real "decision maker" practically speaking.


I am pleased with the outcome of this "opinion exchange", there is no need for arguing , you see, what happened , they almost banned me at guru when I commented that "I don't care about the noise , just an excuse". And clearly noticed that their reviews were slightly biased anyway , thus a violent reaction did prove just that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
3,471 (0.58/day)
System Name Acer Aspire V3-771G-53218G75Maii
Processor Core i5 3210M (2,5-3,1Ghz)
Memory 8GB DDR3 SODIMM
Video Card(s) Geforce GT650M
Storage Samsung 830 256GB - 750GB Toshiba drive
Software Windows 7 x64 Home Premium (non-acer-bloatware)
Right , my bad.

All right , but I wouldn't be so okay with default cooling , as I experienced my self , I wanted to test just that, I left my HD 3870 at default when I bought it , and it froze with screen corruption within 30 minutes. The game was not even so hard on it. It wasn't crysis i tested , but it was maxed out. Half of the problem is , default doesn't always keep it cool enough.
If default doesn't keep it cool enough, there's clearly something wrong with the default. Coolers that do not cool well at default are wrong, I agree with you on that 100% and I would return such a card and demand my cash back.
Indeed , for the noise in this example , we blame the reference cooler. Not that the card is bad , you can always upgrade the cooler or buy a vaporx or whatever upgraded stuff they later manufacture. Because the OEM/reference stuff will never be the best , thus there won't be a card with a score of 10 at release.
Exactly!
I do however agree with the most you proved and that the review is just a consideration , but you have to know , I think that a lot of people buy stuff how they see reviews at glance , this is bad , usually it's the green side who has a little more fps , but that's not the real "decision maker" practically speaking.
True, I for one based my choice on power consumption, noise and of course performance.
I am pleased with the outcome of this "opinion exchange", there is no need for arguing , you see, what happened , they almost banned me at guru when I commented that "I don't care about the noise , just an excuse". And clearly noticed that their reviews were slightly biased anyway , thus a violent reaction did prove just that.

:toast:
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,991 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
look at the +- points from a noob perspective, then read the conclusion. that alone should give you a good impression about the product, many points are not mentioned in the conclusion, while some are emphasized. i think it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what one of my reviews means for him if he doesn't care about fan noise.

it is my firm belief that cards have to be tested how they perform out of the box - not after serious tweaking. 99% of users take the card out of the box, install it in the pc, start using it and dont worry about overclocking, fan control, voltage tweaking and often not even about having the latest [any recent] driver version
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
1,825 (0.31/day)
Location
Slovenia
System Name Multiple - Win7, Win10, Kubuntu
Processor Intel Core i7 3820 OC@ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard Asus P9X79
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory Corsair Vengeance 32GB 1333MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire ATI Radeon RX 480 8GB
Storage Samsung SSD: 970 EVO 1TB, 2x870 EVO 250GB,860 Evo 250GB,850 Evo 250GB, WD 4x1TB, 2x2TB, 4x4TB
Display(s) Asus PB328Q 32' 1440p@75hz
Case Cooler Master CM Storm Trooper
Power Supply Corsair HX750, HX550, Galaxy 520W
Mouse Multiple, Razer Mamba Elite, Logitech M500
Keyboard Multiple - Lenovo, HP, Dell, Logitech
look at the +- points from a noob perspective, then read the conclusion. that alone should give you a good impression about the product, many points are not mentioned in the conclusion, while some are emphasized. i think it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what one of my reviews means for him if he doesn't care about fan noise.

it is my firm belief that cards have to be tested how they perform out of the box - not after serious tweaking. 99% of users take the card out of the box, install it in the pc, start using it and dont worry about overclocking, fan control, voltage tweaking and often not even about having the latest [any recent] driver version

Hands down.

I can't not to agree. That means I do.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.48/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
it is my firm belief that cards have to be tested how they perform out of the box - not after serious tweaking. 85% of users take the card out of the box, install it in the pc, start using it and dont worry about overclocking, fan control, voltage tweaking and often not even about having the latest [any recent] driver version

Sorry but I have to correct you there. That's what 99% of users would do if 22.8% of them didn't have a geek friend. :p
 

handsomerichguy

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
19 (0.00/day)
Location
In front of computer
System Name My Cheap System
Processor Intel Core i7-975 Extreme Edition Bloomfield @ 4.12 GHz 1.385 V
Motherboard ASUS P6T7 WS Supercomputer LGA 1366 Intel X58 CEB
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS 9700 NT 110mm 2 Ball Ultra Quiet
Memory G.SKILL Perfect Storm 6 x 2GB PC3 17066 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) 2 x HIS Radeon HD 5970 Crossfire
Storage Western Digital Caviar 1.5TB
Display(s) Acer H235Hbmid Black 23" 2ms HDMI 300 cd/m2 100000:1
Case COOLER MASTER Stacker 830 CX
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply SILVERSTONE ST1500 1500W 80 PLUS SILVER Certified Active PFC
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit, Matlab 2008, Multisim 10.1, Altium Designer
I love this card
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
476 (0.08/day)
System Name Corporate Commando
Processor Intel i7 3820 @ 4.5ghz
Motherboard Asrock x79 extreme 6gb
Cooling corsair h100
Memory 8 gig corsair 1866 ddr3 ram
Video Card(s) 3 x EVGA GTX 680
Storage 2x samsung F3 1tb drives in RAID 0, 512gb samsung ssd
Display(s) 3 x Asus 27" monitor @ 5760 x 1080
Case Corsair C70
Power Supply Coolermaster 1200watt gold
Top