• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon Instinct MI100 "Arcturus" Hits the Radar, We Have its BIOS

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,677 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD's upcoming large post-Navi graphics chip, codenamed "Arcturus," will debut as "Radeon Instinct MI100", which is an AI-ML accelerator under the Radeon Instinct brand, which AMD calls "Server Accelerators." TechPowerUp accessed its BIOS, which is now up on our VGA BIOS database. The card goes with the device ID "0x1002 0x738C," which confirms "AMD" and "Arcturus,". The BIOS also confirms that memory size is at a massive 32 GB HBM2, clocked at 1000 MHz real (possibly 1 TB/s bandwidth, if memory bus width is 4096-bit).

Both Samsung (KHA884901X) and Hynix memory (H5VR64ESA8H) is supported, which is an important capability for AMD's supply chain. From the ID string "MI100 D34303 A1 XL 200W 32GB 1000m" we can derive that the TDP limit is set to a surprisingly low 200 W, especially considering this is a 128 CU / 8,192 shader count design. Vega 64 and Radeon Instinct MI60 for comparison have around 300 W power budget with 4,096 shaders, 5700 XT has 225 W with 2560 shaders, so either AMD achieved some monumental efficiency improvements with Arcturus or the whole design is intentionally running constrained, so that AMD doesn't reveal their hand to these partners, doing early testing of the card.



-- images removed --

Looking through the BIOS I also found what looks like several clock tables that top out at 1334 MHz, 1091 MHz, 1000 MHz. AMD's engineers typically list clocks in the following order: GPU clock, SOC clock, memory clock. This suggests that the GPU will tick at up to 1334 MHz, way lower than what Navi and Vega were able to achieve — maybe they do that to operate the chip in a more power-efficient way. The memory clock at 1000 MHz, matches the BIOS id string's "1000m", and falls in range with the 2.0 - 2.4 Gbps that Samsung is speccing their HBM2 memory chips at.

Arcturus' debut as a Radeon Instinct product follows the pattern of AMD debuting new big GPUs as low-volume/high-margin AI-ML accelerators first, followed by Radeon Pro and finally Radeon client graphics products. Arcturus is not "big Navi," rather it seems to be much closer to Vega than to Navi, which makes perfect sense given its target market. AMD's Linux sources mention "It's because Arcturus has not 3D engine", which could hint at what AMD did with this chip: take Vega and remove all 3D raster graphics ability, which shaves a few billion transistors off the silicon, freeing up space for more CUs. For gamers, AMD is planning a new line of Navi 20-series chips leveraging 7 nm EUV for launch throughout 2020. Various higher-ups at AMD, including its CEO, publicly hinted that a big client-segment GPU is in the works, and that the company is very much interested at taking another swing at premium 4K UHD gaming.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
something must be getting in the way of higher clocks,maybe?
 
Last edited:
something must be getting the way of higher clocks,maybe?
They're probably designed for maximum performance per watt which is what server farms want. Spending 50% more power for 10% performance uplift doesn't fly in an environment running 1000 cards.


I'm kind of disappointed Arcturus is aiming for ultra-high end. I hope "big Navi" is still coming.
 
Does BIOS show it is a 80CU design?
Memory specs are exact match for what was used in MI60, so not much newsworthy there.

They're probably designed for maximum performance per watt which is what server farms want. Spending 50% more power for 10% performance uplift doesn't fly in an environment running 1000 cards.
This. 100MHz lower base clock (1091 vs 1200) and considerably lower boost clock (1400 vs 1800) does help a lot with power efficiency. Assuming MI100 is 80CU, AMD still has managed a huge efficiency boost though.
 
Does BIOS show it is a 80CU design?
Memory specs are exact match for what was used in MI60, so not much nesworthy there.
It's a 128cu design and essentially gcn 6.0
 
So it confirms that TSMC's N7 is already good enough even for large 650+ mm² silicone?
 

For a full list of speculated specs
 
Wow, this chip is impressive nonetheless!

AMD is finally very brave to design such a monster of a chip! :eek:

I'd like to see Navi 21-based consumer Radeon as soon as possible, too!
 
something must be getting the way of higher clocks,maybe?


It's the doubling of CUs. If you want 2GHz from this beast then it would use 6-700W. It's simple frequency/cores/power scaling.

It's a 128cu design and essentially gcn 6.0

Since Komachi discovered that Arcturus is GFX908 then that's GCN 5 (Vega) or GCN 5.2 (if Vega 20 is GCN 5.1)


It's actually N7+ according to the AMD MI100 Specs page at https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/amd-mi100.g927

That's not AMD's spec page. It's Techpowerup's speculated spec list.

I wonder which one will be better for gaming: MI100 or Navi 21 https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/amd-navi-21.g923 ? ?

We'll never know because Arcturus seems to have no video out ports.
 
It's the doubling of CUs. If you want 2GHz from this beast then it would use 6-700W. It's simple frequency/cores/power scaling.



Since Komachi discovered that Arcturus is GFX908 then that's GCN 5 (Vega) or GCN 5.2 (if Vega 20 is GCN 5.1)




That's not AMD's spec page. It's Techpowerup's speculated spec list.



We'll never know because Arcturus seems to have no video out ports.
GCN 3 and 4 were GFX8 so I don't see why it can't be GCN6
 
HBM2 ??? NOooooo, price will be too high once again :(

Why should you care? it's not for you.

As in, it's not for gamers, datacenter only :P
 
But it wont. it's just for compute , it's cannot become a desktop GPU like Mi60->Radeon VII.
 
700mm2 on 7nm EUV... damn.
Imagine this thing on 14nm, you'd have 3 working dies per wafer :laugh:
 
There is no way AMD is going to present an 8000+ shader consumer GPU and if they do, it won't be economically viable. Can't go this low on clocks and this large on die and still sell with any sort of margin. Especially not with HBM on top. I also struggle to see the relation to Big Navi here.

Also... if AMD is really going to shoot for another Vega repeat with HBM and once more get eclipsed by a simple x80 Ampere... they can close up shop.

So, forget it. Nice proof of concept, not happening for us. Still its nice to see them do a large die like this.
 
Waiting for the die immage :) this is impressive stuff AMD
 
I looked at NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 specs and it says over 200 TOPS at INT8. Is there really so huge difference between Radeon and RTX, or does Nvidia counts differently?
 
I looked at NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 specs and it says over 200 TOPS at INT8. Is there really so huge difference between Radeon and RTX, or does Nvidia counts differently?
In general use, running dumb, unoptimized code, they're pretty close (Mi60 vs V100).
But Nvidia adds Tensor cores and they make all the difference - Nvidia ends up 3-4 times faster in some tasks.

In real life, Nvidia dominated GPU computing before they added Tensors - all thanks to a better ecosystem and support. And nothing changed here.
Even if Mi100 temporarily pulls ahead in performance, it won't be enough.
 
Back
Top