• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Core Configuration Detailed

Tatty_Two

Gone Fishing
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
25,944 (3.75/day)
Location
Worcestershire, UK
Processor Intel Core i9 11900KF @ -.080mV PL max @220w
Motherboard MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK
Cooling DeepCool LS520SE Liquid + 3 Phanteks 140mm case fans
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel Bdie @ 3600Mhz CL14 1.45v Gear 1
Video Card(s) Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC + 8% PL
Storage WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS)
Display(s) AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular
Software Win 11 Home x64
Let's make these things clear:

- R9 Nano will be faster product than R9 290X but not that fast to threaten any Fury;
- R9 Nano won't cost more than 630$, actually we expect price tag in line of around 450$;
- It won't be niche - it should be the new standard or paving the way for new generations of small cards;
- Fury X doesn't need custom boards - you won't achieve anything if you are seeking for guinness record clock heights. It's the best with water and let it please stay with WATER !

So based on your theory, where does the 390X fit in? As for it's pricing, taking into account the price of a 390X at around $420 - $450 how will the 2 fit and who are "we expect a price of 450"?
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Nano should be at or below 390X. The question now is whether or not that is before or after the thermal throttling. We won't get that answered until benchmarks are in.
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,890 (0.82/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory Team Group Dark Pro 8Pack Edition 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 FE
Storage Kingston A2000 1TB + Seagate HDD workhorse
Display(s) Samsung 50" QN94A Neo QLED
Case Antec 1200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 11
VideoCardz.com


I must confess I would expect AMD's top of the range Fiji 596 mm2 HBM monster chip to do a little better against a heavily sliced GM204 398 mm2 chip, but I guess a win is a win.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,849 (0.57/day)
It is silly from your side to prefer air rather than water. You know that lower temperatures have positive effects - they lower power consumption and increase life time.

But these things are mysteries for you.

Probably you are typing just to argue with someone who has better points than you.
I got used to your points and honestly - I am sick of them and want something better.

Two words: Prove it.

Lower temperatures have positive effect: Theoretically true, but a non-point. Cards without extreme overclocking generally have fans and TIM fail before thermal degredation. Additionally, you could theoretically clock you GPU at 200 MHz and decrease power consumption drastically. You'd have a GPU that might well last you your entire life. Of course, that'd be stupid. After a few years GPU performance is dramatically better. Additionally, under clocking would mean your card can't really run any modern games, but superior users have imagination, no. All they need is a text based RPG and they can imagine the rest of it. Kinda seems like cards are clocked such that performance is as good as possible, with the intended lifetime before most cards die being 3-5 years. Overclockers might burn through that lifetime faster, but the replacement cycle generally reaps cards before physics.


You have "better points" than me: In what strange world do you live? Perhaps it's different, where the physical laws of the universe are somehow fundamentally different. Cooling with water is not better than cooling with air, because it's the same physical process. An area of higher thermal energy has a fluid of lower thermal energy pass over it. Due primarily to conductive transference, a part of the thermal energy is transferred to the fluid, and the fluid is moved from the object. The things that influence how much energy is transferred is the thermal capacity of the fluid, the surface area of contact, and the velocity the fluid is flowing. As such, given enough time and resources I could design an air cooler that beats any water cooler on the market. This is physics in action, and your statement about water is better than air demonstrates you are either ignorant or an idiot. Hopefully the former, but given our past discourse the later.


You want something better: Yeah, so do I. I want real engineers to have a crack at the Fury, and have them show us what it could be. By your logic, once a single car is put out on the market we should be done. No SUVs, no trucks, no motorcycles, we only need a motorized one seat car. That's limiting the playing field, because you're too stubborn or have something up your sleeve that you aren't sharing. In the case of the former, you're killing potential sales with inflexibility. In the case of the later, you are trying to demonstrate how clever you are by lopping of the end of your nose. Stupidity through and through. Or perhaps I'm reading this point wrong.

Maybe your logic is that we only need one video card from each team. Nobody wants the 960, 970, 280, 380, 390, 930, or the plethora of other cards. We only need the 980 and Fury competing. Everyone playing PC games should own one of these two cards, and the day they are released every other card should automatically combust. Heck, we only need one card from each team. Let's all make our computers shoot us, should the Steam survey detect anything but the latest piece of hardware in our system.

No matter how I look at your point, it is backwards. Choices are demonstrably what consumers want, and choices actually make things sell. Market research proved this year ago. If you don't agree, walk down a grocery store pasta aisle, and tell me how many brands have only one formulation. How many have just chunky, just smooth, or even just extra thick. None. There is no perfect pasta sauce, and there should be no perfect Fury. You should choose the one that best fits you. AMD is taking this choice away, and it is stupid.




Let's be frank. You've demonstrated unflinching loyalty to a brand that has not earned it. You've demonstrated a fundamental lack of understanding of physics, so much that your understanding of anything must first be given as a matter of faith. You've dismissed accurate criticism, because in your own head there is one right answer, and you always have it. You've done all this completely unflinchingly, and without ever admitting to the vast gulf between your knowledge and abilities. I can't even begin to ascribe anything to you but an unfounded zealotry that could potentially make a suicide bomber slightly jealous.

Realizing that this is inflammatory, perhaps I should end here. You have demonstrated almost no reasonable opinions, and when asked where you come from you wave your hands in the air and call anyone asking questions an idiot. Please, peddle your brand of crap elsewhere. I can take Nvidiots. I can take die hard members of the Red team. I can even stand members of the Intel superior race. What I can't take is people who won't admit they are wrong, and those people who when confronted with their error fling crap at anyone who pointed it out. You are a member of the group of people I despise.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.57/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
There is an "11" footnote marker on the "Compute Units" section of the specs. I would really like to know that footnote actually says.
Here is the relevant footnote slide. Also, AMD's internal benchmarks vs the GTX 970 mITX card were once again done with no anisotrophic filtering for the most part, so numbers probably will differ from actual reviewers and real world usage scenario's.
 
Last edited:

tabascosauz

Moderator
Supporter
Staff member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
8,182 (2.36/day)
Location
Western Canada
System Name ab┃ob
Processor 7800X3D┃5800X3D
Motherboard B650E PG-ITX┃X570 Impact
Cooling NH-U12A + T30┃AXP120-x67
Memory 64GB 6400CL32┃32GB 3600CL14
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Ti Eagle┃RTX A2000
Storage 8TB of SSDs┃1TB SN550
Case Caselabs S3┃Lazer3D HT5

I'm reliving the Skylake thread all over again. Time and time again, he has demonstrated that the comprehension of how the graphics market works, the knowledge of how graphics cards and CPUs work, and the ability to perceive a certain issue from another user's perspective are all far beyond what he is capable of grasping.

Of all the words I typed into that thread, all of them were wasted. It's akin to arguing with someone behind a soundproof wall. He doesn't understand anything that you say, but the bullshit that flows from him is endless.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.09/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Maybe the pasting job was not so good, Hawaii runs hot, but that should not happen on the tri-x cooler...

Nah, it is just the fact that when you jam 2 of them in a closed case, even with 3 120mm high CFM exhaust fans and a 200mm intake on my 650D, the heat from two of the cards just builds up, there is no avoiding it. The top card just runs a good 10°C hotter than the bottom. Swapping the cards didn't change anything, whichever card was on top was running 10°C hotter than the bottom and would hit 95°C and start to throttle.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
1,019 (0.21/day)
Location
Porto
System Name No name / Purple Haze
Processor Phenom II 1100T @ 3.8Ghz / Pentium 4 3.4 EE Gallatin @ 3.825Ghz
Motherboard MSI 970 Gaming/ Abit IC7-MAX3
Cooling CM Hyper 212X / Scythe Andy Samurai Master (CPU) - Modded Ati Silencer 5 rev. 2 (GPU)
Memory 8GB GEIL GB38GB2133C10ADC + 8GB G.Skill F3-14900CL9-4GBXL / 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC4000
Video Card(s) Asus R9 Fury X Strix (4096 SP's/1050 Mhz)/ PowerColor X850XT PE @ (600/1230) AGP + (HD3850 AGP)
Storage Samsung 250 GB / WD Caviar 160GB
Display(s) Benq XL2411T
Audio Device(s) motherboard / Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer Fatal1ty Pro + Front panel
Power Supply Tagan BZ 900W / Corsair HX620w
Mouse Zowie AM
Keyboard Qpad MK-50
Software Windows 7 Pro 64Bit / Windows XP
Benchmark Scores 64CU Fury: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11269229 / X850XT PE http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5532432
Nah, it is just the fact that when you jam 2 of them in a closed case, even with 3 120mm high CFM exhaust fans and a 200mm intake on my 650D, the heat from two of the cards just builds up, there is no avoiding it. The top card just runs a good 10°C hotter than the bottom. Swapping the cards didn't change anything, whichever card was on top was running 10°C hotter than the bottom and would hit 95°C and start to throttle.

I guess AMD wisely chose "Hawaii" for a reason x)
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.54/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Perhaps focusing more on getting cooler air TO the cards as well as getting air out of the case would have helped. Those 200mm fans barely move any air (most of them).

Anyway, that has nothing to do with the thread title, so I digress. :)
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.09/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Perhaps focusing more on getting cooler air TO the cards as well as getting air out of the case would have helped. Those 200mm fans barely move any air (most of them).

Anyway, that has nothing to do with the thread title, so I digress. :)

If airflow was a problem with my setup, no average user is going to be able to avoid throttling. The rear exhaust in the case is 75CFM, the two top exhausts are pushing 100CFM each minimum and kick up to 150CFM when things get hot.

The front 200mm is rated for 130CFM and runs full blast all the time. Yes, the 200mm fans seem like they don't push a lot of air, because you can't feel it, but they actually do move a lot of air, just at a lower pressure. But even still, the exhaust is pulling air in from the other vents in the computer, so the intake isn't as important. And there was plenty of heat coming out of the top of my case, it was insane.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
1,019 (0.21/day)
Location
Porto
System Name No name / Purple Haze
Processor Phenom II 1100T @ 3.8Ghz / Pentium 4 3.4 EE Gallatin @ 3.825Ghz
Motherboard MSI 970 Gaming/ Abit IC7-MAX3
Cooling CM Hyper 212X / Scythe Andy Samurai Master (CPU) - Modded Ati Silencer 5 rev. 2 (GPU)
Memory 8GB GEIL GB38GB2133C10ADC + 8GB G.Skill F3-14900CL9-4GBXL / 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC4000
Video Card(s) Asus R9 Fury X Strix (4096 SP's/1050 Mhz)/ PowerColor X850XT PE @ (600/1230) AGP + (HD3850 AGP)
Storage Samsung 250 GB / WD Caviar 160GB
Display(s) Benq XL2411T
Audio Device(s) motherboard / Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer Fatal1ty Pro + Front panel
Power Supply Tagan BZ 900W / Corsair HX620w
Mouse Zowie AM
Keyboard Qpad MK-50
Software Windows 7 Pro 64Bit / Windows XP
Benchmark Scores 64CU Fury: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11269229 / X850XT PE http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5532432
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,946 (0.63/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Fury X = desktops
Nano = SFF

That's what I was afraid of and it is entirely possible. It puts me in a pickle. :( I might have to go Fury or 290X.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.57/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.

tabascosauz

Moderator
Supporter
Staff member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
8,182 (2.36/day)
Location
Western Canada
System Name ab┃ob
Processor 7800X3D┃5800X3D
Motherboard B650E PG-ITX┃X570 Impact
Cooling NH-U12A + T30┃AXP120-x67
Memory 64GB 6400CL32┃32GB 3600CL14
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Ti Eagle┃RTX A2000
Storage 8TB of SSDs┃1TB SN550
Case Caselabs S3┃Lazer3D HT5
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.57/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Yeah, looks like the GTX 970 then. No one in their right mind is buying that thing for $650 when even the already overpriced GTX 970 DC Mini sells for about $440-460.
I think the assumption is that the $649 is MSRP in $US.
Having said that, Gigabyte's GTX 970 mini is the same length as the Nano/Asus GTX970 DC2 at 170mm/6.7" , and is $300. ( the Asus card is presently $335 at the Egg). It would be interesting to see how many people would justify a ~30% increase in performance for a 216% increase in price - especially when AMD themselves are offering a better equipped card offering better performance at the same (supposed) price point.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Welp, that $649 price tag made me buy a 290X for $310. I have to repost HumanSmoke's picture because it is so true:

I went half AMD! :D
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,391 (0.82/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 7600 / Ryzen 5 4600G / Ryzen 5 5500
Motherboard X670E Gaming Plus WiFi / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2)
Cooling Aigo ICE 400SE / Segotep T4 / Νoctua U12S
Memory Kingston FURY Beast 32GB DDR5 6000 / 16GB JUHOR / 32GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 + Aegis 3200
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX) / Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes / NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe, SATA, external storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) / 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
AMD is like a team that scores two own goals in the last five minutes of the match, while winning 1-0, out of fear that it might win.

I was expecting a price above $500. But the same price as 980Ti? YOU F#$%^&*ING MORONS IF EVGA (for example) COMES OUT WITH A 980TI ITX WHERE ARE YOU GOING TO PUT NANO? The fact that a 980Ti ITX would be a couple of inches longer, is not going to save Nano.

Nano will probably go only in ready systems, like Alienware's where you can hide the price, or sell it to Alienware for $550 and not $650. But in retail they will probably sell less cards than the number of posts in here.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
854 (0.16/day)
The game, and resolution. It's true it isn't a huge penalty but to make a blanket statement like that makes it false as there are plenty of games/resolutions that show WAY more loss than 1 fps.

I have never experienced it, I give the blanket statement because afaik it's correct. If you've played PC games since 1998 and ALWAYS mess with graphics options this would be clear. I have had more FPS increase from closing background apps.

Plenty of games? WAY more loss than 1 fps? Would love to see these results.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,171 (2.80/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
I have never experienced it, I give the blanket statement because afaik it's correct. If you've played PC games since 1998 and ALWAYS mess with graphics options this would be clear. I have had more FPS increase from closing background apps.

Plenty of games? WAY more loss than 1 fps? Would love to see these results.
It wouldn't take too much to do a couple benchmark runs with and without. If I wasn't limited to just my laptop for the week, it would test it out myself.

Personally, I've seen AF reduce frame-rate by more than 1 FPS but, it's no where as heavy as AA is. From a technical standpoint, AF is highly dependent on memory bandwidth unlike AA which is more dependent on the speed and quantity of the ROPs.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.54/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
I have never experienced it, I give the blanket statement because afaik it's correct. If you've played PC games since 1998 and ALWAYS mess with graphics options this would be clear. I have had more FPS increase from closing background apps.

Plenty of games? WAY more loss than 1 fps? Would love to see these results.
more loss than 1 fps.. but as Aquinus said, it's not much. Sorry to be so pedantic about jt
 
Top