• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Graphics Card OpenCL Score Leaks

Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
420 (0.15/day)
System Name The Cum Blaster
Processor R9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wifi
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer LT360
Memory 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix @ 3800C16
Video Card(s) 7900 XTX Nitro+
Storage Lots
Display(s) 4k60hz, 4k144hz
Case Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 750W
I'd call it looking at the big picture, personally.
nah, in any AMD-related thread he always shits on anything they do, and when he gets proven wrong by time, he always ends up moving the goalpost
usually it goes like this:
Zen 3 going to be faster than intel in games? nope, no way, don't kid yourself. -> Zen 3 actually ends up being faster than intel in games? heh, it's not an upgrade to intel users anyway!
RDNA 2 going to be faster than 2080 ti in games? nope, no way, don't kid yourself. -> RDNA 2 actually ends up being faster than a 2080 ti AND rivals nvidia's top cards? well, it might be faster than the 2080 ti by a nice margin, but the RT performance isn't up to far, so who cares if their raster performance is on point!

I've seen these two exact scenarios happen in threads he commented on, at this point I wouldn't be surprised if he gets paid to post such tripe... either that or it's a massive cope/buyers remorse, don't know which

Their RT performance, this moment, is no better than first gen RT from NV.
first/second gen tessellation was slow as fuck too, who cares. RTRT effects won't become REALLY mainstream until at least 5 years, and won't be mandatory in any game for at least 10 more years/end of the new console generation... and by the time they do become mainstream, current RTX and RX cards will be outdated by then, and you'll be getting much better performance for less in said time, so really it's a flawed argument anyway
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.57/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
There are AMD people who do the saaaaaaaaaaaame thing in NV/Intel threads bud. This place is a cesspool for the polarizing toxic fanboys. I've put many, from both sides, on ignore, but at this point, since these people (somehow) continue to exist at this site, a lot of these threads look like swiss cheese. :p

first/second gen tessellation was slow as fuck too, who cares. RTRT effects won't become REALLY mainstream until at least 5 years, and won't be mandatory in any game for at least 10 more years
Just comparing apples to apples, bud. It's slower, period. And if you want to use that feature, it won't be as good as the NV offerings. I would also bet good money says if their RT was as fast, suddenly a lot of AMD people would be jocking the merits................. but here we are. Let the (curiously) loyal defend their brethren at all costs.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
420 (0.15/day)
System Name The Cum Blaster
Processor R9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wifi
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer LT360
Memory 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix @ 3800C16
Video Card(s) 7900 XTX Nitro+
Storage Lots
Display(s) 4k60hz, 4k144hz
Case Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 750W
Just comparing apples to apples, bud. It's slower, period. And if you want to use that feature, it won't be as good as the NV offerings.
I won't want to use that feature for at least 5 years, just like how I didn't want to use tessellation when it first emerged back in 2010 :D, the hardware is simply not mature enough yet, and the effects themselves do not provide a large enough visual uplift to justify the framerate impact
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.57/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
I won't want to use that feature for at least 5 years, just like how I didn't want to use tessellation when it first emerged back in 2010 :D, the hardware is simply not mature enough yet, and the effects themselves do not provide a large enough visual uplift to justify the framerate impact
That's you. there are PLENTY of others who use it without issue or concern. 2nd gen RT is VASTLY improved and in many titles, you don't need DLSS for 60 FPS+ at 1440p even with a 3070.

Justify it all you want, but you know what I said is the truth. If you don't use it, that's fine, but there are plenty who do, more daily, and that train gains momentum thanks to consoles.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,192 (3.93/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
there he is, the cute little shill, moving goalposts as usual!
I'm not particularly keen on raytracing performance and wouldn't use that as a deciding factor to judge a GPU at the moment, but I do value NVENC, DLSS is actually useful in some instances, and WFH I'm actually finding RTX Voice useful too.

Given how popular streaming and WFH is at the moment, those are features that can't really be ignored and AMD simply doesn't compete at all. Like, they haven't even bothered trying! On top of that, the number of things that are vastly superior when run using CUDA instead of OpenCL is starting to get ridiculous. I know CUDA is proprietary, but Nvidia have put the work in to make it a thing, and spent years investing in it at this point. AMD have basically said "sure, we do OpenCL" and left it to rot with developers left to fend for themselves. Is it any wonder that CUDA is now the dominant application acceleration API?

Before anyone wonders, No, I'm not an Nvidia fanboy. If anything I hate Nvidia for regular unethical and shady practices and have a strong preference for the underdog (because that's the better option that promotes healthy competition and benefits us as consumers the most) but I can't deny the facts - RDNA2 is completely uncompetitive in many ways. The only thing it is actually competitive in is traditional raster-based gaming and that's a shrinking slice of the market.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
420 (0.15/day)
System Name The Cum Blaster
Processor R9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wifi
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer LT360
Memory 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix @ 3800C16
Video Card(s) 7900 XTX Nitro+
Storage Lots
Display(s) 4k60hz, 4k144hz
Case Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 750W
That's you. there are PLENTY of others who use it without issue.

Justify it all you want, but you know what I said is the truth. :)
fair enough :)
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
63 (0.01/day)
System Name HydroAMD
Processor AMD Ryzen 5600X
Motherboard X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Watercooling: 360mm Fans: 6x Corsair RGB 120mm
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill TridentZ Neo @ 3600Mhz
Video Card(s) XFX Speedster MERC319 AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Black
Storage Samsung Evo 960 500GB - 2TB HP EX950 m.2 - 1TB 850 Pro
Display(s) Samsung 32" Curved QHD C32HG70 2560×1440
Case Corsair Crystal 570X
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX860
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum XT
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Time Spy - 18284
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
951 (0.19/day)
System Name Little Boy / New Guy
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X / Intel Core I5 10400F
Motherboard Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate / Asus H410M Prime
Cooling ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 A-RGB / ARCTIC Freezer 34 eSports DUO
Memory TeamGroup Zeus 2x16GB 3200Mhz CL16 / Teamgroup 1x16GB 3000Mhz CL18
Video Card(s) Asrock Phantom RX 6800 XT 16GB / Asus RTX 3060 Ti 8GB DUAL Mini V2
Storage Patriot Viper VPN100 Nvme 1TB / OCZ Vertex 4 256GB Sata / Ultrastar 2TB / IronWolf 4TB / WD Red 8TB
Display(s) Compumax MF32C 144Hz QHD / ViewSonic OMNI 27 144Hz QHD
Case Phanteks Eclipse P400A / Montech X3 Mesh
Power Supply Aresgame 850W 80+ Gold / Aerocool 850W Plus bronze
Mouse Gigabyte Force M7 Thor
Keyboard Gigabyte Aivia K8100
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Bits
2nd gen RT is VASTLY improved and in many titles

Actually they haven't improved RT AT ALL, they just added a LOT more cores, the impact is exactly the same as the RTX 2000 series.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.57/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Actually they haven't improved RT AT ALL, they just added a LOT more cores, the impact is exactly the same as the RTX 2000 series.
Correct. Regardless of how they got there, RT performance is a lot better.
 

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,147 (1.27/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
Correct. Regardless of how they got there, RT performance is a lot better.
I also think most all current RT games were optimised for their 1st gen RT cores, as time goes on I'm optimistic that if games are optimised more heavily for Ampere (which irrespective of RT will certainly be the case) then the divide between Turing and Ampere in RT processing will widen.

AMD's architectures improving over time relative to their Nvidia counterpart when they launched may be at least in part due to their compute heavy nature, and it might be how Ampere fares over time too.

To hammer in an old point, indeed if RT, DLSS, voice, streaming, CUDA etc etc mean bupkiss to you, and I know there would be MANY out there that fit the bill, all the power to you, why pay for features you don't want or wont use. But accept that the other side of that coin is if you want any or all of those, AMD is either weaker on non-existent in those spaces.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,192 (3.93/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
I also think most all current RT games were optimised for their 1st gen RT cores, as time goes on I'm optimistic that if games are optimised more heavily for Ampere (which irrespective of RT will certainly be the case) then the divide between Turing and Ampere in RT processing will widen.

I'm only guessing here, but I suspect that game devs will optimise for AMD's DXR implementation first and foremost. It's a huge market with (relatively) fixed hardware that commands the lion's share of the sales volumes and profit.

As for the PC gaming market, yes - it's pretty big - but it's not all running AMD 6800-series raytracing cards or better.
 
Top