• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 7-1800X Cracks Cinebench R15 World Record at 5.36 GHz

btarunr

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Specs
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD Ryzen 7-1800X scored a Cinebench R15 world record, surpassing even the fastest overclocked Core i7-6950X 10-core processor based bench, in the multi-threaded benchmark. The eight-core Ryzen 7-1800X was overclocked by Swedish overclocker Elmor, to 5.36 GHz with all its cores and threads enabled, scoring 2,454 points in Cinebench R15, surpassing the previous world record on the HWBot leaderboard held by a Core i7-5960X overclocked at 6.00 GHz, by 9 points.

This feat also proves that at high frequencies, the "Zen" architecture exhibits higher IPC than Intel architectures such as "Haswell-E" and "Broadwell-E." Elsewhere in the world, German overclocker Der8auer successfully overclocked the Ryzen 7-1800X to 5.80 GHz (5802.93 MHz), with a base-clock of 130.4 MHz, and a multiplier of 44.5x, and an insane 1.97V core voltage. The best part? None of the 8 cores or SMT needed to be disabled.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
While this doesn't help casual users, it's nice to know there are no cold bugs and that CPU is capable of reaching high clocks (although at extremely low temperatures). Means CPU is done properly. Considering this will be their platform for years to come, I think it's an important factor. Building on top of already buggy platform could be problematic...
 
I have a feeling AMD intentionally kept the freqs low in order to follow the crappy and callous strategy of Intel's on releasing "new" CPUs, with only a small amount of freqs up.
And call it a new CPU.
 
Prima.Vera said:
I have a feeling AMD intentionally kept the freqs low in order to follow the crappy and callous strategy of Intel's on releasing "new" CPUs, with only a small amount of freqs up.
And call it a new CPU.
Click to expand...

pitfalls of using a low power process sadly.
 
Prima.Vera said:
I have a feeling AMD intentionally kept the freqs low...
Click to expand...
Low? Compared to which other first gen 14 nm 8 core CPU?

It's not low, and the air OC's speaks for themselves, there isn't much headroom anyway, for now.
 
Mats said:
Low? Compared to which other first gen 14 nm 8 core CPU?

It's not low, and the air OC's speaks for themselves, there isn't much headroom anyway, for now.
Click to expand...

The fab process is literally called LPP. Lol.
 
Anyone delid a Ryzen yet and see what the TIM is on it?

I know Intel has been using crap for awhile now. Curious if AMD cheapened too.
 
Ryzen will not make gamers happy, but I guess some professionals out there have a smile bigger than Jokers.
 
This is not correct. It's not a WR, but an 8 core hardware record. Record for Cinebench R15 10 core is by XtremeAddict and its over 2,700 points at 5.3GHz odd using 6950X.
So once again this is not a WR. Score is about the same as a 4600 ~ 4700MHz 6950X.
 
ShockG said:
This is not correct. It's not a WR, but an 8 core hardware record. Record for Cinebench R15 10 core is by XtremeAddict and its over 2,700 points at 5.3GHz odd using 6950X.
So once again this is not a WR. Score is about the same as a 4600 ~ 4700MHz 6950X.
Click to expand...

Its a WR for 8 core CPU's not 10cores.
 
ShockG said:
This is not correct. It's not a WR, but an 8 core hardware record. Record for Cinebench R15 10 core is by XtremeAddict and its over 2,700 points at 5.3GHz odd using 6950X.
So once again this is not a WR. Score is about the same as a 4600 ~ 4700MHz 6950X.
Click to expand...

No, the world record in Cinebench R15 is "8299 cb with 4x Intel Xeon E7 8890 v4 at 2700MHz"


Edit: All said, it's clear that as GF's fab process improves, Ryzen will be able to hit higher clocks, and if it's true that its IPC actually improves with clock speed, AMD can easily market it as a next generation (probably coupled with some improvements and bugfixes), and it would be a very successful release with potentially 25%+ performance increase chip-to-chip.
 
Last edited:
AMD brought some competition with Ryzen and that's all we ,the customers need.
So good job AMD and keep it up.
 
Glad to hear it, the overall value and subsequent purchase incentive just keeps getting better. I'd buy one if I was building right now.

AMD is ryzen to the occasion ;)

...Sorry, couldn't resist.
 
cut AMD some slack please, this is first time AMD using brand spankin' new uarch, furthermore in was manufactured it 14nm for the first time also
this is reason why AMD cant reach high clock like Intel was

now lets compare to Intel side, major uarch was Sandy Bridge after Nehalem and 45nm Wolfdale cores,
and the rest was optimization, refresh, node change, and so on

Intel Kaby Lake was also optimization from skylake cores (hence 100-400 Mhz bump depending on SKU)

with that said give AMD some time to optimize its uarch and hopefully it can competitive with Intel clock rate ( since AMD mostly fixed its IPC weakness)
 
I find it interesting that even with the clock difference between the Ryzen chip and the Haswell chip, the Ryzen chip still beats it. So it seems like the IPC gains per clock increase is huge
 
ShockG said:
This is not correct. It's not a WR, but an 8 core hardware record.
Click to expand...
Quit ya bitching, it clearly says A world record, not THE world record. :slap:
 
and Still no review from "TECHPOWERUP"..............
 
Caring1 said:
Quit ya bitching, it clearly says A world record, not THE world record. :slap:
Click to expand...
Er no. There's no such thing. World Record is exactly that, the world's fastest. This isn't it. In the editorial it says beating the 6950X, and it simply hasn't, even #20 on the bot with 6950X has a higher score. The Bot rules are very clear on this. It's simply a hardware record. Details matter.
http://hwbot.org/submission/3473862_elmor_cinebench___r15_ryzen_7_1800x_2454_cb This is the score, you can see for yourself that there are no WR points there. THIS - http://hwbot.org/submission/3234137_dhenzjhen_cinebench___r15_4x_xeon_e7_8890_v4_8299_cb is the record and there are three gold cups there to indicate it, one which is for WORLD RECORD

This is important to get right, it is Digiworthy that got it wrong, amongst other things
 
Nobody gives a damn about Cinebench.
Meanwhile 7700K is killing it in games.
 
Again. Wow I'm impressed with ryzen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top