• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 7 "2800X" Not Part of First Wave

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,843 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
About the TDP, 1st gen ryzen all core boost was only +100mhz, and it still stayed with the 95w , so I wonder if the 105w doesn't indicate a more aggressive all core boost ? If the leaked cinebench score is true (1780), then the all core boost is above 4Ghz.
I think you're talking about XFR, boost was already substantially better than 100MHz.
However, boost speeds are of secondary importance to the average user, because there's no specification how and for how long you can benefit from them.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
932 (0.13/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name "Run of the mill" (except GPU)
Processor R9 3900X
Motherboard ASRock X470 Taich Ultimate
Cooling Cryorig (not recommended)
Memory 32GB (2 x 16GB) Team 3200 MT/s, CL14
Video Card(s) Radeon RX6900XT
Storage Samsung 970 Evo plus 1TB NVMe
Display(s) Samsung Q95T
Case Define R5
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)
They could also be saving some "FX" 2800X as a surprise for launch day. ;)
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
1,195 (0.27/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Deepcool LS520 SE
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG GL850
Case Dan A4 H2O
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 11 pro
I think you're talking about XFR, boost was already substantially better than 100MHz.
However, boost speeds are of secondary importance to the average user, because there's no specification how and for how long you can benefit from them.
No, XFR is the 1-2 core boost, i'm talking about the all core one. My 1700x can only reach 3.5Ghz on all core, 3.8 on 2 core, and XFR is only 3.9Ghz at best. Even when I had a "small" pure rock slim the all core boost had a good sustain.

I said that because at 4Ghz on all core my 1700x is only doing 1733 on cinebench, and the leak suggest that a stock 2700x can do 1780, wich is why i think that the all core boost is more aggresive because that's not a score that a 3.7Ghz Ryzen could do. But it's all based on a leak, so i could be wrong.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,507 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Wow, they need 105W to get that 2700X to 4.35 Ghz

That is quite significant and kinda kills any dreams of a higher clocked version popping up soon. These TDP bumps clearly indicate they're pushing Ryzen beyond its comfort zone, just like Intel's CFL is right now.

Meanwhile, the 7820X , which is the only 8 core consumer CPU you can get from Intel right now is rated at 140W , granted it runs at higher clocks. It's also worth mentioning that this on a node which is objectively superior. This 12nm AMD is using right now isn't even a proper node shrink and still optimized for low power.

With all that being said , what sort of miracle TDP did you expect AMD could pull off which not even their competitor can properly achieve ?
 
Last edited:

r9

Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
3,300 (0.55/day)
System Name Primary|Secondary|Poweredge r410|Dell XPS|SteamDeck
Processor i7 11700k|i7 9700k|2 x E5620 |i5 5500U|Zen 2 4c/8t
Memory 32GB DDR4|16GB DDR4|16GB DDR4|32GB ECC DDR3|8GB DDR4|16GB LPDDR5
Video Card(s) RX 7800xt|RX 6700xt |On-Board|On-Board|8 RDNA 2 CUs
Storage 2TB m.2|512GB SSD+1TB SSD|2x256GBSSD 2x2TBGB|256GB sata|512GB nvme
Display(s) 50" 4k TV | Dell 27" |22" |3.3"|7"
VR HMD Samsung Odyssey+ | Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 11 Pro|Windows 10 Pro|Windows 10 Home| Server 2012 r2|Windows 10 Pro
4.35 GHz is not bad at all. The 2800X is going to be cherry picked parts that can do 4.4 - 4.5 GHz would be my guess. It will sell like crap if the price is too much higher if that is the case. It would need to push at least 4.5 GHz all cores and 4.65 GHz on 4 cores to justify any reasonable price difference to the 2700X.

2800X it's not meant to sell great anyways. Like you said its just cherry picked 2700X. AMD just gonna put it there for good bench numbers and to make Ryzen architecture looks better on paper. I don't think they can push the frequency much past 2700X even on picked ones.
I assume they will try to justify on higher base clocks.
I still think its a descent improvement from a node shrink with some miner memory latency improvements.
Should bring them closer for Gaming compared to Intel.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
2,715 (0.58/day)
System Name MSI GP76
Processor intel i7 11800h
Cooling 2 laptop fans
Memory 32gb of 3000mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Nvidia 3070
Storage x2 PNY 8tb cs2130 m.2 SSD--16tb of space
Display(s) 17.3" IPS 1920x1080 240Hz
Power Supply 280w laptop power supply
Mouse Logitech m705
Keyboard laptop keyboard
Software lots of movies and Windows 10 with win 7 shell
Benchmark Scores Good enough for me
Why not lets just wait until reviews come out and all of you can say something about this processor. Too many people say blah blah this and that when the product isnt even out yet.
 

iO

Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
531 (0.12/day)
Location
Germany
Processor R7 5700x
Motherboard MSI B450i Gaming
Cooling Accelero Mono CPU Edition
Memory 16 GB VLP
Video Card(s) RX 7900 GRE Dual
Storage P34A80 512GB
Display(s) LG 27UM67 UHD
Case none
Power Supply Fractal Ion 650 SFX
I say this is their final line up. No 2800X to differentiate more between AM4 and TR4 and quad cores consist of only APUs.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,843 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Why not lets just wait until reviews come out and all of you can say something about this processor. Too many people say blah blah this and that when the product isnt even out yet.
What would reviews tell you more than you already know? It's the same CPU that was released last year. New node was supposed to make it faster. It didn't. End of story.

At the end of the day, the same amount of $$$ buys you a slightly faster CPU than last years, so it's not all bad. In fact, it's only bad if you were hoping to see significant more performance from this year's batch.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
342 (0.06/day)
System Name Xajel Main
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard ASRock X570M Steel Legened
Cooling Corsair H100i PRO
Memory G.Skill DDR4 3600 32GB (2x16GB)
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 Ti AMP Holo
Storage (OS) Gigabyte AORUS NVMe Gen4 1TB + (Personal) WD Black SN850X 2TB + (Store) WD 8TB HDD
Display(s) LG 38WN95C Ultrawide 3840x1600 144Hz
Case Cooler Master CM690 III
Audio Device(s) Built-in Audio + Yamaha SR-C20 Soundbar
Power Supply Thermaltake 750W
Mouse Logitech MK710 Combo
Keyboard Logitech MK710 Combo (M705)
Software Windows 11 Pro
Maybe they do have chips capable of faster speeds but those are being stockpiled for the TR SKUs and will only be released for a 2800(X) when those needs are met, or as discussed, competition requires it.

Top 5% of chips go to TR or or something? A TR 2950X hitting 3.9+ base and a matching boost/XFR increase would certainly be interesting.

Then there is the question of how much production ends up in Epyc.


As far as the roadmaps go, EPYC won't be updated with the second gen. & 12nm... it will wait till 2019 with 7nm

So the 12nm 2000 series will all go for Ryzen Desktop & Ryzen TR...
 

rav

Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
15 (0.00/day)
These is little point of a 2800X. Just like there were little point of 1900X.

Hmmm.... just as there is no point to the i7-8700K. Actually even less of a point as it costs considerably more.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
350 (0.06/day)
Location
NYC
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z370-G GAMING AC
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro RGB
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 16GB DDR4 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 500GB
Display(s) Dell S2417DG 165Hz
Case NZXT H400i
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Cooler Master - Masterkeys Pro L RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64Bit
Hmmm.... just there is no point to the i7-8700K. Actually even less of a point as it costs considerably more.

My 8700K is very fast at everything i ask it to do. I don't need 8 slower cores ty. Those 2 extra cores are pointless to me.

Also what do you mean costs considerably more? I paid 320$ for my 8700K.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
241 (0.04/day)
Location
Ohio, USA
System Name The Black Mamba
Processor AMD FX-8150 @ 4.8 GHz + 2.5 GHz CPUNB
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair V Formula
Cooling Custom water, HeatKiller 3.0 LT, Swiftech MCR320, 3 GentleTyphoon 1850 RPM, OCZ HydroPulse 800
Memory Super Talent 2000 CAS 7 @ 2100 7-7-7-21 1.70v / GSKill Pi 2133 CAS 7 @ 2250 7-10-7-27
Video Card(s) 2x Sapphire Vapor-X HD5770's @ stock
Storage 2x 640GB Caviar Black in RAID 0
Display(s) 22" ASUS something + 20" Sceptre something
Case Lian-Li "Lancool" PC-K62
Power Supply XFX Black Edition 850w 80 Plus Silver
Software Windows 7 Pro
Benchmark Scores Too many to list ;D
The 1800X only hits 4.1 GHz with XFR. The 2700X has been rumored to have a 4.2 GHz turbo too, are we sure it isn't 4.35 XFR2?
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,843 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
The 1800X only hits 4.1 GHz with XFR. The 2700X has been rumored to have a 4.2 GHz turbo too, are we sure it isn't 4.35 XFR2?
Again, if it hits 4.35GHz for 10 seconds, it's not going to make much of a difference. There's a reason neither intel nor AMD are willing to give us numbers when it comes to their boost speeds ;)
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
2,070 (0.39/day)
System Name iJayo
Processor i7 14700k
Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX z790-E wifi
Cooling Pearless Assasi
Memory 32 gigs Corsair Vengence
Video Card(s) Nvidia RTX 2070 Super
Storage 1tb 840 evo, Itb samsung M.2 ssd 1 & 3 tb seagate hdd, 120 gig Hyper X ssd
Display(s) 42" Nec retail display monitor/ 34" Dell curved 165hz monitor
Case O11 mini
Audio Device(s) M-Audio monitors
Power Supply LIan li 750 mini
Mouse corsair Dark Saber
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121
Software Window 11 pro
Benchmark Scores meh... feel me on the battle field!
.....am I the only one excited that there is actually legitimate competition again? Such great times!!!!!!!! Now if we can only bring the gpus back down to earth.....
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
302 (0.07/day)
Location
Michigan, USA
Processor AMD 1700X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Memory F4-3200C14D-16GFX
Video Card(s) GTX 1070
Storage 960 Pro
Display(s) PG279Q
Case HAF X
Power Supply Silencer MK III 850
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
.....am I the only one excited that there is actually legitimate competition again? Such great times!!!!!!!! Now if we can only bring the gpus back down to earth.....
No, plenty of excitement. This is good news - a relatively quick stable release with improvements. The value of the 2600X is staggering if you think about the cost of a Intel counterpart just 3 years ago.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
1,195 (0.27/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Deepcool LS520 SE
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG GL850
Case Dan A4 H2O
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 11 pro
The magazine is already out in france (paper only), but close to nobody want to do a "proper leak" the last comment on this forum is the best thing until the online review comes out.
https://forums.guru3d.com/threads/a...otted-to-be-released-over-the-weekend.420079/
But I'm surprised at the powerconsumption figures, that node shrink had literaly 0 impact on efficiency, 142 w is already what an oc R7 can pull at 3.9-4Ghz.
 
Last edited:

rav

Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
15 (0.00/day)
My 8700K is very fast at everything i ask it to do. I don't need 8 slower cores ty. Those 2 extra cores are pointless to me.

Also what do you mean costs considerably more? I paid 320$ for my 8700K.

You didn't pay $320. Newegg and Amazon have them for $349. Considerably more than 1800x.

Furthermore CPU World shows them for $359 OEM and $370 white box.

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Core_i7/Intel-Core i7 i7-8700K.html

In fact you don't even have an i7-8700k. If you did then you would have known what the correct price was.

Besides 6 cores moves far less data than 8 cores and software that IS optimized for 8+ cores does run considerably faster.

The only true thing you did say was "2 extra cores are pointless for" YOU.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,843 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Again, if it hits 4.35GHz for 10 seconds, it's not going to make much of a difference. There's a reason neither intel nor AMD are willing to give us numbers when it comes to their boost speeds ;)
Pretty sure it can hit 4.35 for more than 10 seconds if there's a good cooler installed.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,843 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Pretty sure it can hit 4.35 for more than 10 seconds if there's a good cooler installed.
Define "good cooler". Because we're drifting into opinion territory.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Define "good cooler". Because we're drifting into opinion territory.
Water coolers, like H100(i) or better. Also not just an opinion, with better cooling comes longer turbos.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
System Name RYZEN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.9 GHz
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Corsair H110i
Memory 32 GB G.Skill 3200 MHz C14
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 Ti AMP Extreme
Storage Samsung 960 PRO 1 TB + Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB
Display(s) Dell UP2715K @4K
Case Corsair Carbide Clear 600C
Audio Device(s) Woo Audio WA7tp tube amp + Massdrop x Sennheiser HD 6XX
Power Supply Silverstone Prime Ultra 850 Titanium
Mouse Razer Deathadder
Keyboard Razer Ornata
Software Windows 10 Home
First post here but very long time lurker. Logged in to say that since I live in Paris, right after reading this news I went to a kiosk and bought the magazine...
Interesting results for sure. Without spoiling the journalists’ work, performance is higher but so is power consumption...and it’s bit more than 105W!
Clocks are really good though, and turbo behavior is much better with 3+ cores active. Definitely puts more pressure on Intel.
Won’t make me retire my 1700@4GHz however, I’ll happily wait for the 3000 series :)
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
20 (0.01/day)
Processor Intel i9-9900K
Motherboard MSI MPG Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ @ 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung NVMe + SSD + WD 12TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung KS8500 55" UHD
Case Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Onboard Audio, Logitech Pro X Headset
Power Supply Corsair HX850 Platinum
Mouse Razer Basilisk Ultimate
Keyboard Logitech
Software Windows 10 Pro
As soon as I see TDP in the comments I'm like : "Yip, here we go (again)...they think TDP = Power draw". CPU TDP is the maximum amount of heat generated by that CPU. Higher TDP = Needs better cooling. The i5-8600K and the i7-8700K both have a TDP of 95W, but during wPrime testing the i5 consumes 114W while the i7 consumes 150W. https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Intel/Core_i5_8600K/16.html
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
System Name RYZEN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.9 GHz
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Corsair H110i
Memory 32 GB G.Skill 3200 MHz C14
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 Ti AMP Extreme
Storage Samsung 960 PRO 1 TB + Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB
Display(s) Dell UP2715K @4K
Case Corsair Carbide Clear 600C
Audio Device(s) Woo Audio WA7tp tube amp + Massdrop x Sennheiser HD 6XX
Power Supply Silverstone Prime Ultra 850 Titanium
Mouse Razer Deathadder
Keyboard Razer Ornata
Software Windows 10 Home
You’re right! I was actually thinking about TDP and not power consumption, they say in the magazine that it’s higher than 105W.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,793 (0.45/day)
Hmmm.... just as there is no point to the i7-8700K. Actually even less of a point as it costs considerably more.

Uhm what. If not i7 8700k there would not be unlocked 6c/12t processor from intel. If not R7 2800x there would still be two 8c/16t unlocked processors from amd. So there's more point on the former one and less point on the latter. And what are you talking about price? i7 8700k msrp was $380, while R7 1800x msrp was $499. Yes I know it does not cost that much anymore, which is kind of the point not releasing Ryzen 7 2800x: There is no prize range to put that cpu anymore.
 
Top