• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX Storms to the Top of PassMark Mobile CPU Leaderboard

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, the company's flagship mobile processor announced at the 2021 International CES, has stormed to the top of the PassMark mobile CPU leaderboard. The 8-core/16-thread processor, codenamed "Cezanne," is based on AMD's latest "Zen 3" microarchitecture. It tops the charts with 24,039 points, compared to 16,594 points of the Intel Core i9-10980HK, team blue's current flagship in the 45+ W segment. Both the 5900HX and i9-10980HK are unlocked 8-core parts. The 5900HX also ends up 21% faster than AMD's previous mobile flagship, the Ryzen 9 4900HS, and 25% faster than the 4800H. Intel's upcoming 8-core "Tiger Lake" mobile processor, due for the second half of 2021, has its task cut out.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Hmm, Intel mobile flagship is tested with only 2.4GHz. I think in reality AMD mobile is slower when compared in same frequencies with Intel mobile.
Uh-huh, sure :rolleyes:
 
Hmm, Intel mobile flagship is tested with only 2.4GHz. I think in reality AMD mobile is slower when compared in same frequencies with Intel mobile.

If <something-something> AMD is slower. (c) pathetic state of the blue world

I blame failed Fab nodes for that.
 
Hmm, Intel mobile flagship is tested with only 2.4GHz. I think in reality AMD mobile is slower when compared in same frequencies with Intel mobile.
Or Maybe Passmark is showing the base frequency for the intel cpu, rather than the average effective frequency (since laptops have a hard time to sustain their turbo clocks)
1611215557663.png
 
Just look on pictures with table of results. There is no info for what frequency of 5900HX in test. I'm sure that in reality both AMD@Intel work limited because of laptop cooling, but Intel is better when compared in same frequency.
Or Maybe Passmark is showing the base frequency for the intel cpu.
View attachment 184921
No! 2.4GHz look picture in article. 200MHz more than base.
 
Just look on pictures with table of results. There is no info for what frequency of 5900HX in test. I'm sure that in reality both AMD@Intel work limited because of laptop cooling, but Intel is better when compared in same frequency.

No! 2.4GHz look picture in article. 200MHz more than base.
because I showed the 10870H, the base clock of the 10980HK is 2.4Ghz. Intel 10th gen has a lower IPC than zen3, it's been proven several times
1611215870581.png

1611216129807.png
 
I think George might have tumbled one too many times
 
Hmm, Intel mobile flagship is tested with only 2.4GHz. I think in reality AMD mobile is slower when compared in same frequencies with Intel mobile.
Hmm, your weed seems to be good. Do you have more to share?
 
Hmm, Intel mobile flagship is tested with only 2.4GHz.
Really, as if it's the first time we've seen this. :roll:


1611229770309.png
 
Hmm, Intel mobile flagship is tested with only 2.4GHz. I think in reality AMD mobile is slower when compared in same frequencies with Intel mobile.
jc.jpg
 
Wake me up when it's available on the shelves.
 
Is legit. Google is your friend.

Welcome to the internet, boomers. Kindly check our news section covered by P*rnhub.If your bored, Newegg and Microcenter had their NSFW content. If you find anything dissatisfied, please kindly fill our form at Reddit :D
Sidenote, I don't need to explain my jokes :p
 
They don't need to if AMD products never make it into Laptop or in a config people actually want.
Ya a lot of this. And end result is laptop manf not implementing dual channel, or a decent screen, and/or etc. etc. But at the same time one should still see more laptops around with AMD chips, which makes me think they are short on those also. I recall seeing lots of A8, A10, A12 chips in laptops even a few years ago, more than I do with ryzen chips.
 
Back
Top