- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 3,881 (0.82/day)
I've read it, again they don't have to ask for the proof, AMD's claims were supposed to be the proof. That is the basis behind this case, AMD was lying to their investors and knew it.
Or these two investors never read the "Cautionary Statement" that follows each press release or the "Risk Factors" that goes into every SEC Filing. They have to prove the alligation there making aren't covered by those.
I'm sure we will hear about it if the Judge agrees to proceed with the case and if we don't hear about it the Judge dismissed it.