• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD to release 7nm Vega gaming card and a Polaris refresh by end of 2018?

Would love to see AMD kick Nvidia's ass on value with ray tracing (like FreeSync)..
 
No, it sounds like a die shrunk Vega Founder Edition. Because that is what it is.

They modified the silicon to add something like 15+ new instructions that are only useful for AI/Compute and added ECC to the core<--(This bit could be wrong.. as it could have said it was just HBM2. IT MUMBLES...). (So its got ECC like Hawaii if I am not mistaken on the core arch that had it last time)

Its not a direct die shrink.

However, my source at AMD has basically said.. AMD/RTG is worried about RTX. However, given its pricing and the performance penalty given on current generation hardware, they don't feel its a major threat at this time. That said, it made it clear to note- Its giving some tension within the company as leadership wants to focus on the high margin products and the low margin stuff after they fulfill the high margin market(servers/datacenter/workstations). They are ignoring the consumer market in the hopes, that the money they make from the commercial/enterprise market will fuel the R&D into their next generation consumer products. For me, I just hope it works out.
 
Yeah it's absolutely hilarious that we can't speculate at all. The amount of Intel / Nvidia bias on these forums is ridiculous hahaha.

Since your the self-dubbed, resident expert, then do you care to explain why Nvidia rushed out the RTX cards when just a few months earlier they said that there wouldn't be any new gaming GPU line-ups for a very long time?

Gosh, I don't know, PR? Come on.
 
Yeah, I won't get my hopes up...
I am just happy RTG realized GCN is their main problem and working actively to kill it. It is just like bulldozer over their CPU side, it must die.
 
Both these rumors are completely false as the person whom posted them should have already known. The 7nm AMD cartds for gaming will arrive in the 2nd or 3rd quarter of 2019. Wishing does NOT make things so and I hate rumor mongering. Get a life .
 
I'm going to bookmark this thread.
If by the end of the year we have release, or solid confirmation, of 7nm gaming Vega I'll request some of the posters here to change their location to "Tech Noob Shire".
 
Last edited:
mighty, i can answer you (yeesh everyone is so hostile)

so you're eager for amd rumors, but how come not for nv rumors? meaning, you accepted what jen said at computex without cross checking the rumors & context, of course he needs to assure press & especially shareholders, it's risky for a company to persuade people to wait until next gen instead of buying now https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect

1) rumors that contained the words 'ampere' & 'turing' started early in the year

2a) a new consumer gen is every two years, all the people complaining about having pascal 'for so long' are making up nonsense, what kind of blind stupidity doesnt notice... 2006 tesla1, 2008 tesla2, 2010 fermi, 2012 kepler, 2014 maxwell, 2016 pascal, 2018 turing

2b) a new consumer gen is ~Q2/Q3: june 2008 tesla2, march/april 2010 fermi, march 2012 kepler, september 2014 (big) maxwell, may 2016 pascal, september/october 2018 turing

3a) news reports of surplus pascal inventory a few months ago were appearing, extremely likely due to a reduction of people mining, more people buying used or just not buying up farms of cards (it takes months for manufacturing to adjust, so december/january everyone had pressure to decide what to do, that mining buble was quite a lot more massive than the previous summer one, but then that stock takes time to show up physically around the world)

3b) i saw someone ask what happened to maxwell when pascal launched, the convo may have been specific to 980ti, but apparently nv requested the inventory (not sure if chips that partners later assemble or fully built cards) to be returned to them instead of letting partners keep them (probably they could use them for rma or to give low prices to stores for example)

3c) news reports said nv asked partners to eat the cost of pascal inventory rather than how maxwell ended, this is around the time that a new gen would normally launch so logistical decisions need to be made, even if there's no competition, they 'need' to be steady (dont forget their stock price, they probably dont want it to deflate after the 2015-2017 boost, same for amd really)

4) the word for canadian distributors is that 1080ti & maybe 1080 stock is disappearing, this doesnt mean stores are sold out yet, it means stores cant order more stock, but this makes me wonder about that big typhoon in mid september

5) holidays are coming, games launch a bit before holidays, nv needs to find a balance between ending pascal & end of year, i wonder if they're also trying to get in before intel's 9 series so people are more eager to spend (if nv launches after, i presume people will think more than twice about the high rtx pricing after they spent at least a few hundred on new cpus)

6) directx ray tracing seems to require the new windows update, i know there arent exactly any games, but it would be poor to end users (including developers/artists) to have cards+drivers without OS support, they wouldnt even be able to start their own personal experiments in their own game engines with the gameworks sdk or whatever the workflow is

7) the 2080ti is the one that keeps getting shipping delays, i feel like this might be related to the typhoon even though someone on reddit emailed jen & got a more detailed reply from some other manager that mentioned some missing info in their supply chain, but i suppose it might not be typhoon since 2080 is not getting delays, dont forget the recent highest end ti models normally launch half a year later instead of at the same time, i think 2080 is on time & maybe they rushed 2080ti because 2080 is 'the same' as 1080ti, they really needed some halo next gen 4k numbers (2080ti is indeed quite powerful)

8) one of the replies here mentioned tension inside amd, there is a wccf (bleh i know) article that says similar https://wccftech.com/exclusive-amd-navi-gpu-roadmap-cost-zen/ how amd is trying to go for more pro/server/custom in order to survive better, it's understandable given how dangerously low stock & high debt they were a few years ago, i expect raja had his grand dreams unable to get funded or risked, it's not like raja hasnt left amd before https://www.anandtech.com/show/6907/the-king-is-back-raja-koduri-leaves-apple-returns-to-amd

9) i actually missed or didnt remember what david wang said the first time, but after checking some news from the summer, he said 'wants' to release 'a new gpu' per year, it may not be gaming or at least this year may not be the first year

10) [note: i didnt watch the video yet] a polaris refresh extremely likely has to be 12nm glofo not 7nm/14nm/16nm tsmc, not only due to how many others are trying to use tsmc, but that unfortunate wafer agreement amd has, i hope something changed now that glofo is canceling 7nm...

the timing seems a bit awkward though, linux kernel drivers are not something to extrapolate from (intel has updates for its late 2019+ parts starting this past 2018 summer), i think i saw someone say the device id is old, we can always double check when original vega/polaris/fiji/tonga/gcn updates happened to see past timing anyway

the game bundle promo ends at the start of november, one one hand we could think that's to clear old stock for a refresh, on the other it could mean no new cards this year

videocardz hasnt mentioned anything about a refresh, they usually try to do a good job with rumors by not blindly posting all, attempting to ask around or analyze first

navi has commonly been thought to be ~Q2 2019, it seems to make more sense to have a polaris refresh be closer to navi, especially if navi wont be across everything (i/we dont know, or navi is Q3/Q4 2019 & a refresh is needed)

what would be refreshed anyway? there are multiple polaris chips, yet people only think of or want a 680 without a 660 or 650? the performance gap from 560 to 570 is already way too large & has been since 460 to 470



long post... i hope you can now see all the angles, maybe i can call this 'skeptically eager', we cant just accept all rumors & we cant literally interpret press statements, i'm still leaning towards what i've been expecting, but it's indeed possible that the plans from early this year have changed due to the very unexpected glofo change, intel's multitrack drifting, & nv acting like apple way more than usual for some reason (to people that get real spiteful real fast, the bf5 scandal is way overblown & being used for multiple excuses)

in the end we just have to wait so this was all a waste (unless you're trying to buy this season), we could at least stop being so immature in the meantime
 
mighty, i can answer you (yeesh everyone is so hostile)

so you're eager for amd rumors, but how come not for nv rumors? meaning, you accepted what jen said at computex without cross checking the rumors & context, of course he needs to assure press & especially shareholders, it's risky for a company to persuade people to wait until next gen instead of buying now https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect

1) rumors that contained the words 'ampere' & 'turing' started early in the year

2a) a new consumer gen is every two years, all the people complaining about having pascal 'for so long' are making up nonsense, what kind of blind stupidity doesnt notice... 2006 tesla1, 2008 tesla2, 2010 fermi, 2012 kepler, 2014 maxwell, 2016 pascal, 2018 turing

2b) a new consumer gen is ~Q2/Q3: june 2008 tesla2, march/april 2010 fermi, march 2012 kepler, september 2014 (big) maxwell, may 2016 pascal, september/october 2018 turing

3a) news reports of surplus pascal inventory a few months ago were appearing, extremely likely due to a reduction of people mining, more people buying used or just not buying up farms of cards (it takes months for manufacturing to adjust, so december/january everyone had pressure to decide what to do, that mining buble was quite a lot more massive than the previous summer one, but then that stock takes time to show up physically around the world)

3b) i saw someone ask what happened to maxwell when pascal launched, the convo may have been specific to 980ti, but apparently nv requested the inventory (not sure if chips that partners later assemble or fully built cards) to be returned to them instead of letting partners keep them (probably they could use them for rma or to give low prices to stores for example)

3c) news reports said nv asked partners to eat the cost of pascal inventory rather than how maxwell ended, this is around the time that a new gen would normally launch so logistical decisions need to be made, even if there's no competition, they 'need' to be steady (dont forget their stock price, they probably dont want it to deflate after the 2015-2017 boost, same for amd really)

4) the word for canadian distributors is that 1080ti & maybe 1080 stock is disappearing, this doesnt mean stores are sold out yet, it means stores cant order more stock, but this makes me wonder about that big typhoon in mid september

5) holidays are coming, games launch a bit before holidays, nv needs to find a balance between ending pascal & end of year, i wonder if they're also trying to get in before intel's 9 series so people are more eager to spend (if nv launches after, i presume people will think more than twice about the high rtx pricing after they spent at least a few hundred on new cpus)

6) directx ray tracing seems to require the new windows update, i know there arent exactly any games, but it would be poor to end users (including developers/artists) to have cards+drivers without OS support, they wouldnt even be able to start their own personal experiments in their own game engines with the gameworks sdk or whatever the workflow is

7) the 2080ti is the one that keeps getting shipping delays, i feel like this might be related to the typhoon even though someone on reddit emailed jen & got a more detailed reply from some other manager that mentioned some missing info in their supply chain, but i suppose it might not be typhoon since 2080 is not getting delays, dont forget the recent highest end ti models normally launch half a year later instead of at the same time, i think 2080 is on time & maybe they rushed 2080ti because 2080 is 'the same' as 1080ti, they really needed some halo next gen 4k numbers (2080ti is indeed quite powerful)

8) one of the replies here mentioned tension inside amd, there is a wccf (bleh i know) article that says similar https://wccftech.com/exclusive-amd-navi-gpu-roadmap-cost-zen/ how amd is trying to go for more pro/server/custom in order to survive better, it's understandable given how dangerously low stock & high debt they were a few years ago, i expect raja had his grand dreams unable to get funded or risked, it's not like raja hasnt left amd before https://www.anandtech.com/show/6907/the-king-is-back-raja-koduri-leaves-apple-returns-to-amd

9) i actually missed or didnt remember what david wang said the first time, but after checking some news from the summer, he said 'wants' to release 'a new gpu' per year, it may not be gaming or at least this year may not be the first year

10) [note: i didnt watch the video yet] a polaris refresh extremely likely has to be 12nm glofo not 7nm/14nm/16nm tsmc, not only due to how many others are trying to use tsmc, but that unfortunate wafer agreement amd has, i hope something changed now that glofo is canceling 7nm...

the timing seems a bit awkward though, linux kernel drivers are not something to extrapolate from (intel has updates for its late 2019+ parts starting this past 2018 summer), i think i saw someone say the device id is old, we can always double check when original vega/polaris/fiji/tonga/gcn updates happened to see past timing anyway

the game bundle promo ends at the start of november, one one hand we could think that's to clear old stock for a refresh, on the other it could mean no new cards this year

videocardz hasnt mentioned anything about a refresh, they usually try to do a good job with rumors by not blindly posting all, attempting to ask around or analyze first

navi has commonly been thought to be ~Q2 2019, it seems to make more sense to have a polaris refresh be closer to navi, especially if navi wont be across everything (i/we dont know, or navi is Q3/Q4 2019 & a refresh is needed)

what would be refreshed anyway? there are multiple polaris chips, yet people only think of or want a 680 without a 660 or 650? the performance gap from 560 to 570 is already way too large & has been since 460 to 470



long post... i hope you can now see all the angles, maybe i can call this 'skeptically eager', we cant just accept all rumors & we cant literally interpret press statements, i'm still leaning towards what i've been expecting, but it's indeed possible that the plans from early this year have changed due to the very unexpected glofo change, intel's multitrack drifting, & nv acting like apple way more than usual for some reason (to people that get real spiteful real fast, the bf5 scandal is way overblown & being used for multiple excuses)

in the end we just have to wait so this was all a waste (unless you're trying to buy this season), we could at least stop being so immature in the meantime

Thank you, I appreciate this post.

Well, I heard that Nvidia was having a stock influx because an aftermarket GPU manufacturer returned a pretty large some of GPUs- I have seen this be reported on a few hardware sites.

The reason I went down the gaming Vega 7nm rabbit hole is because it seemed very plausible at the time and it still may happen, but probably not this year after AMD's CES 2019 announcement. Still I want to look at some of the facts that we have on hand to get a better overall idea of the whole picture. We know that this year Vega is indeed being shrunk down to 7nm because it has been announced and showcased by AMD. According to AMD, Vega's move to 7nm will provide a 35% performance boost; it is important to note that this percentage is a little vague, but at least it gives us somewhat of a starting point.

A lot of hardware sites are speculating that Navi will be even more powerful than 7nm Vega and to put this into perspective, 7nm Vega would be getting a 35% performance boost from Vega 64 which would push the Vega GPU line-up beyond GTX 1080ti levels. With this information in mind, if Navi is suppose to actually be even more powerful then Vega's 7nm offering, then AMD could do some serious competing with Nvidia's RTX lineup because AMD doesn't need cards that actually outperform RTX, just cards that surpass a GTX 1080ti, get somewhat close to RTX and that have a competitive price
point.

In terms of the Polaris refresh, a lot of hardware sites have been reporting this and it makes sense because AMD Polaris GPUs have been extremely successful and I do remember reading somewhere that their Polaris cards are their best selling cards ever. So if there is a refresh towards the end of the year, we can expect slightly better performance, but better TDP.

I really think it is important to note that AMD has publicly stated that they are committed to gaming and they said they want to try to bring new gaming cards to consumers every year. Vega was released last year, but as of this year we haven't gotten anything. At the bare minimum, all we might see this year is a Polaris refresh which isn't a bad thing. However, with Vega still having price issues, AMD will NOT be able to compete with the price drops of the older GTX cards which is why initially a 7nm Vega gaming card, at least on paper, made some sense, but if they ever decide to go this route, it won't be until next year. I just do not know how much revenue a Polaris refresh would actually provide AMD...
 
Last edited:
Next generation consoles are closing in, you can bet AMD has something big in the works. If there is one constant across all of this is that every new GPU/CPU architecture they make is meant to be used across multiple platforms. Vega already fulfilled it's purpose : high-end desktop, APU, HPC, we're not going to see anymore of that.

4) the word for canadian distributors is that 1080ti & maybe 1080 stock is disappearing, this doesnt mean stores are sold out yet, it means stores cant order more stock, but this makes me wonder about that big typhoon in mid september

It means they make room for higher margin products.
 
Next generation consoles are closing in, you can bet AMD has something big in the works. If there is one constant across all of this is that every new GPU/CPU architecture they make is meant to be used across multiple platforms. Vega already fulfilled it's purpose : high-end desktop, APU, HPC, we're not going to see anymore of that.
wccf stated vega was for apple, navi is for ps5, the development & launch schedules are based on them rather than amd running its own schedule

vega is strange that it only has low end or maximum end, mid with gddr5 is completely missing, that's the main problem with it, that's what 580 should have been

It means they make room for higher margin products.
the margin for cards is normally very low for stores, like 3% or less, this is after the distributor takes their own margin, & after the brand partner takes their own margin

but when supply is no longer offered to stores, that doesnt have to do with margins, it has to do with distribution, with what partners produce or with what nvidia demands to happen

did you remember how polaris 5 series launched? in the past you could get old gen stock before it's gone, but this time it seemed to happen extremely quickly, 4 series was gone in days or weeks from store listings, pcpartpicker even removed the charts too fast, i wanted to take a look at 2016-2017 in late april 2017 but too late... i do remember some sales were really good, 470 4gb was dipping way low, must have been a combination of amd push & stores clearing
 
A lot of hardware sites are speculating that Navi will be even more powerful than 7nm Vega...
If a 7nm Navi isn't able to significantly outperform a 7 nm Vega there is something seriously wrong.
 
Back
Top