- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 9,104 (4.06/day)
System Name | Bragging Rights |
---|---|
Processor | Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz |
Motherboard | It has no markings but it's green |
Cooling | No, it's a 2.2W processor |
Memory | 2GB DDR3L-1333 |
Video Card(s) | Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz) |
Storage | 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3 |
Display(s) | 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz |
Case | Veddha T2 |
Audio Device(s) | Apparently, yes |
Power Supply | Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger |
Mouse | MX Anywhere 2 |
Keyboard | Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all) |
VR HMD | Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though.... |
Software | W10 21H1, barely |
Benchmark Scores | I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000. |
In fairness I missed that this was a reversed board like the one MSI is showing.And what exactly stops this from being standardized a few years down the road? It's new. It has to start somewhere.
There's far from zero benefits to this. How is the cable not being hidden? It's literally moved to the back of the motherboard tray along with all the others like the annoying USB front panel connectors.
It's a solution that just makes cases wider though (since now we need even more space behind the motherboard tray for cable bend radius AND plug+socket z-height.
I'd be less irritated by this if all of the major case and motherboard vendors had collaborated on an ATX+ reversed-board standard or something, but it's looking like Asus boards only work in Asus cases, and MSI boards only work in MSI cases.
I don't even like the idea, but I'm okay with that. What I'm not okay with is a bunch of conflicting proprietary formats.
IMO it's a solution looking for a problem. The problem is apparently "visible cables" but moving everything out of sight for the sake of vanity builds creates a new problem - woefully inefficient use of space.