ASUS GeForce GT 440 1 GB

Shou Miko · Feb 3, 2011

srsly sry but i need to lol here, bcs the original GT440 is build on the GF106 gpu and has 144 Cuda cores and 24 ROPs for OEM marked and the other build on GF108 only has 96 Cuda core and 4 ROPs what about a test vs. the two of them, but srsly i would luv to get GT440 OEM more than the others non-OEM bcs they are better specs.... :twitch:

sliderider · Feb 3, 2011

Yukikaze said:
What I really want to know is why doesn't the GPU industry switch video cards in this price range to a PCIe x4 interface (and the lowest performing cards to PCIe x1). It has no effect on the performance of those cards, the PCBs will be cheaper (less copper), and every OTHER expansion slot industry is doing it constantly to put devices into smaller slots (especially things like NICs and RAID controllers). They will still work in all longer slots, and also fit into smaller secondary and tertiary slots.

There WILL be a performance hit by moving the cards to the slower PCIe spec slots even if the cards are slow to begin with. Think about it, you're taking a card that already runs slow in an x16 slot and now you're choking off the bandwith it has access to by putting it in a slower slot. Just because a card isn't good for gaming doesn't mean it's not utilizing the available bandwith of the slot that it sits in. NIC's and RAID controllers can operate at peak capacity in slower slots which is why the industry uses those slots for those things and leaves the PCIe x16 slots for video which needs the additional bandwith.

Zubasa · Feb 3, 2011

sliderider said:
There WILL be a performance hit by moving the cards to the slower PCIe spec slots even if the cards are slow to begin with. Think about it, you're taking a card that already runs slow in an x16 slot and now you're choking off the bandwith it has access to by putting it in a slower slot. Just because a card isn't good for gaming doesn't mean it's not utilizing the available bandwith of the slot that it sits in. NIC's and RAID controllers can operate at peak capacity in slower slots which is why the industry uses those slots for those things and leaves the PCIe x16 slots for video which needs the additional bandwith.

FYI.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_5870_PCI-Express_Scaling/25.html

Yukikaze · Feb 3, 2011

sliderider said:
There WILL be a performance hit by moving the cards to the slower PCIe spec slots even if the cards are slow to begin with. Think about it, you're taking a card that already runs slow in an x16 slot and now you're choking off the bandwith it has access to by putting it in a slower slot. Just because a card isn't good for gaming doesn't mean it's not utilizing the available bandwith of the slot that it sits in. NIC's and RAID controllers can operate at peak capacity in slower slots which is why the industry uses those slots for those things and leaves the PCIe x16 slots for video which needs the additional bandwith.

You are making the (false) assumption that it is the PCIe bandwidth that makes the cards slow in the first place. It doesn't. Reducing the bandwidth only affects performance if the bandwidth was being used up in the first place. The reality of the situation is that it doesn't.

mtosev · Feb 5, 2011

W1zzard said:
looks like it .. i'll rebench and fix asap

HD 5450 is still the fastest card? wtf

HD 5450 gets more FPS at higher resolutions :laugh:

GSquadron · Feb 5, 2011

5970 should be the worst card ever than

Over_Lord · Feb 6, 2011

damric said:
Great Review. Pointless Card. AMD has the market locked up on the low power cards for HTPC. Nvidia doesn't really have anything competetive until the $120+ range, but they are looking really good in the high end segment.

Yeah my 5750 rocked. I had it clocked 960/1350 with a pencil mod I was scoring as high as stock 4890 in 3dmark. A buddy of mine had his crossfired at 1GHZ and scored 5k in 3dmark11, which is stock GTX 480 scores. Pretty good bang for buck I'd say.

Yep the HD5750 is actually a brilliant card, overclocks very very well, stock cards especially(voltage killing) and is priced very very low...
If there was a cheaper HD5750 512MB version it would trump HD5670 for bang for buck prize..

On the other note... anybody giving away an 8800GT for free(folding)?? lol

mudkip · Feb 6, 2011

So it's slower than de GT 240? Thank god I just bought mine and I was like ; wth I should've wait a few more weeks lol.

GT 240 GDDR5 :toast:

Gzero · Feb 7, 2011

Yukikaze said:
You are making the (false) assumption that it is the PCIe bandwidth that makes the cards slow in the first place. It doesn't. Reducing the bandwidth only affects performance if the bandwidth was being used up in the first place. The reality of the situation is that it doesn't.

Helps if you have evidence to back up your blanket statements... :shadedshu

Why do you think consoles perform so well? Oh that's right, much more bandwidth available between the cpu + ram and gpu.

Yukikaze · Feb 7, 2011

Gzero said:
Helps if you have evidence to back up your blanket statements... :shadedshu

Why do you think consoles perform so well? Oh that's right, much more bandwidth available between the cpu + ram and gpu.

The evidence has been posted above by another user already: The HD5870 loses an average 5% of its performance running across a PCIe 2.0 x4 link. A slower card takes more time to process information, and thus its need to be fed by information is lower, meaning that its performance loss is less than 5%, and quite negligible at that point.

I have a PS3, so I'll use it as an example: The PS3 has far inferior GPU memory bandwidth compared to just about any modern video card above the 60$ price point, achieving 22GB/sec to its own GDDR3 memory and <= 20GB/sec to the XDR memory (Worse than a HD4670, actually). Which is not surprising, considering how outdated its GPU actually is. The amount of memory in a PS3 is also tiny.

All in all, a PS3 is hopelessly outmatched by a half-decent PC in anything except ease of use (and the subject of exclusives, which have nothing to do with a HW argument) for gaming purposes, so saying that it "performs so well" is simply false.

pantherx12 · Feb 7, 2011

Gzero said:
Helps if you have evidence to back up your blanket statements... :shadedshu

Why do you think consoles perform so well? Oh that's right, much more bandwidth available between the cpu + ram and gpu.

Perform so well?

I thought they performed badly hence using much lower resolutions and then upscaling them.

Vsyncing video to 25 or 30fps.

Oh and lets not forget in terms of G-flops etc they're pants.

They're consoles not pcs (read here, electronic toy) they're not supposed to be the bees knees and they arnt.

I can run my 6870 in a x4 slot and get barely any performance hit. And you talking about a low end card that does not use all bandwidth being bottlenecked.

I've seen pci-e scaling reviews on other sites too, they all state the same, makes hardly any difference.

I've seen people mod low end pci-e x16 cards to fit in x1 slots with no bottleneck XD

btarunr · Feb 7, 2011

Gzero said:
Helps if you have evidence to back up your blanket statements... :shadedshu

Why do you think consoles perform so well? Oh that's right, much more bandwidth available between the cpu + ram and gpu.

No, it's because today's consoles run at 1280x720 (entry-level for PC gaming), and with much tighter geometry/texture/shader data.

LAN_deRf_HA · Feb 8, 2011

This mean wow is back in for future card reviews or is it being relegated to the low end?

danipisika · Feb 12, 2011

can you please explain me how come gt 440 that has ddr5(so much more bandwidth) and higher clocks than gt 430(only dddr3).... can score quite the same as gt 430 ??? :banghead:

(i thought this card will beat also the gt 240.... :banghead:

)

MxPhenom 216 · Feb 12, 2011

hardcore_gamer said:
Anything less than a 5770 is not good for gaming

at low low resolutions a HD5670 is fine for gaming

Gzero · Feb 14, 2011

btarunr said:
No, it's because today's consoles run at 1280x720 (entry-level for PC gaming), and with much tighter geometry/texture/shader data.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSX_'Reality_Synthesizer'

# Cell FlexIO bus interface

* 20 GB/s read to the Cell and XDR memory
* 15 GB/s write to the Cell and XDR memory

# Floating Point Operations: 400.4 Gigaflops per second ((24 * 27 Flops + 8 * 10 Flops) * 550)

Not bad for something designed back in 2003/2006.

qu4k3r · Feb 21, 2011

nvidiaintelftw said:
at low low resolutions a HD5670 is fine for gaming

I agree. I have a HD5670 and runs almost everything good, decent playable (30-40fps) with high settings and 4xAA at 1400x900.

cdawall · Feb 21, 2011

Gzero said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSX_'Reality_Synthesizer'

# Cell FlexIO bus interface

* 20 GB/s read to the Cell and XDR memory
* 15 GB/s write to the Cell and XDR memory

# Floating Point Operations: 400.4 Gigaflops per second ((24 * 27 Flops + 8 * 10 Flops) * 550)

Not bad for something designed back in 2003/2006.

That number is a load of crap and still doesn't make up for consoles pushing 720p and the equald of medium/low pc settings the ps3 has a 7800gtx in it not exactly highend gaming anymore

Oxford · Mar 6, 2011

This card is crap, from a competition standpoint.

Right now, on Amazon, it's going for over $100.

The Galaxy 460 768 has been seen for around $90 AR a number of times now.

Even at regular pricing, this card has no reason to exist. The 5670 is a superior card in every respect.

I don't see why a product that has no reason to be brought to market would get an 8.0 score. Anandtech's review was pretty clear about the 430 specs not being designed for gaming. 4 ROPs! Yet, Nvidia evidently thinks it can sucker people into thinking it's adequate gaming card by giving it faster memory. It's a bad design for gaming, inefficient as heck. It even makes the 480 look better in performance per watt.

Oxford · Mar 6, 2011

It really pisses me off that I'm unemployed and jokers come up with garbage like this and bring it to market. Maybe some marketeer did some research and found that fanbois and noobs are dumb enough to buy a product like this and recycling the lame 430 (which probably wasn't selling all that well) is a good use of surplus product. So maybe I'm naive for thinking a product should actually be competitive and well-engineered in order to be produced and sold. The 430 had a reason to exist, however tenuous, so it seems that the only reason the 440 exists is to try to sell the unused chips at a premium to gudgeons.

This product should be priced to be competitive with the 5670 AR deals. It should be cheaper than those deals, with no rebate. If that's not practical, then a better design should be produced and the 108 should be relegated to OEMs until it runs out. If Nvidia thinks fanboi loyalty is going to help its bottom line, it should do things to encourage that sentiment, like release compelling products.

Casecutter · Apr 27, 2011

What you Left Out Paints the Real Picture Beneath

I didn't like that there are power consumption for a GT240, but then none for GTS 450.. Then we go to performance and no GT240 numbers, but now GTS 450 appears.

It all a little suspect picking and choosing what to show especially when all running right in the same grouping. Wiz if you don't have comparative data then run it... when it pertinent to painting the market segment. Not having GT 240 DDR5 is shady, if you need to run new B-M for that card you should have.

While while this GT440 must have been "powerful enough for full HD resolutions" but you never mentioned that, or has that only become a requirement in the late month and a half? :shadedshu

wteSmithy · Jul 13, 2011

Calle2003 said:
I might as well overclock my GT 430 (that I currently run as a PhysX card) to a GT 440.

I have the 8800GTS still but due to that being dual-slot I can't fit it alongside my soundcard to use for PhysX. That meant buying the EVGA GT440 which is single-slot and works brilliantly for PhysX. Picked it up for 60 pounds new which is nothing.

Playing Mafia 2 @1920x1200 maxed out, bench score me average of 60fps with PhysX High. It's installed in my last PCIe slot (x4)GT440 bandwidth is 2GBps. Doubt there is a better Nvidia single-slot card out there.

Steevo · Jul 14, 2011

Casecutter said:
I didn't like that there are power consumption for a GT240, but then none for GTS 450.. Then we go to performance and no GT240 numbers, but now GTS 450 appears.

It all a little suspect picking and choosing what to show especially when all running right in the same grouping. Wiz if you don't have comparative data then run it... when it pertinent to painting the market segment. Not having GT 240 DDR5 is shady, if you need to run new B-M for that card you should have.

While while this GT440 must have been "powerful enough for full HD resolutions" but you never mentioned that, or has that only become a requirement in the late month and a half? :shadedshu

Anyone with half a brain can see this is just a cheap shot by Nvidia to pick up on fanboi marketshare, anyone with a full brain will realize that certain cards have been benchmarked a few reviews ago and those numbers are used for certain comparisons. And just plain idiots will moan over market segment for cards that are just a waste of time when it already takes a week plus worth of work to get the data for a review.

Much like some low end high memory ATI cards, this one stinks of recycled crap to clear the shelves of old stock.

Casecutter · Jul 14, 2011

^ - Steevo, Not sure why those with brains (half or full) can’t acknowledge lapses in pertinent data, or choose to just go oh-well.

Not providing such direct comparison means, older B-M with different CPU/chipsets and memory will slant any true value and the legitimacy. Not revealing the preceding model against the current in testing provides nothing or... conceal something.

I don't see the green team market groups release of this was done to compete, or for fanboi market share, just a “fill the hole” with a new number and hope no one notices it’s not competitive. And some may have folded, caved-in to aid in that deception.

Say it ain't so...

mudkip · Aug 20, 2011

Steevo said:
Anyone with half a brain can see this is just a cheap shot by Nvidia to pick up on fanboi marketshare, anyone with a full brain will realize that certain cards have been benchmarked a few reviews ago and those numbers are used for certain comparisons. And just plain idiots will moan over market segment for cards that are just a waste of time when it already takes a week plus worth of work to get the data for a review.

Much like some low end high memory ATI cards, this one stinks of recycled crap to clear the shelves of old stock.

What a narrow minded comment. If there wouldn't be a market for low end GPU's then why would they make it? for most consumers, non enthusiast, a low end card is all they need. Flash, games like Sims are perfectly playable, also low/green cards are being used for HTPC's.

I'm glad i have my GT 240. i can play MW2 on it, runs passively and hackintosh supports it. I don't need a 200-300$, maybe in the future

System Name	Lynni PS \ Lenowo TwinkPad L14 G2
Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 7700 Raphael (Waiting on 9800X3D) \ i5-1135G7 Tiger Lake-U
Motherboard	ASRock B650M PG Riptide Bios v. 3.10 AMD AGESA 1.2.0.2a \ Lenowo BDPLANAR Bios 1.68
Cooling	Noctua NH-D15 Chromax.Black (Only middle fan) \ Lenowo C-267C-2
Memory	G.Skill Flare X5 2x16GB DDR5 6000MHZ CL36-36-36-96 AMD EXPO \ Willk Elektronik 2x16GB 2666MHZ CL17
Video Card(s)	Sapphire Radeon RX 590 Nitro+ SE (RX 7900 XT/XTX or RX 9070 XT?) \| Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics
Storage	Gigabyte M30 1TB\|Sabrent Rocket 2TB\| HDD: 10TB\|1TB \ WD RED SN700 1TB
Display(s)	KTC M27T20S 1440p@165Hz \| LG 48CX OLED 4K HDR \| Innolux 14" 1080p
Case	Asus Prime AP201 White Mesh \| Lenowo L14 G2 chassis
Audio Device(s)	Steelseries Arctis Pro Wireless
Power Supply	Be Quiet! Pure Power 12 M 750W Goldie \| 65W
Mouse	Logitech G305 Lightspeedy Wireless \| Lenowo TouchPad & Logitech G305
Keyboard	Ducky One 3 Daybreak Fullsize \| L14 G2 UK Lumi
Software	Win11 IoT Enterprise 24H2 UK \| Win11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2 UK / Arch (Fan)
Benchmark Scores	3DMARK: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/89434432? GPU-Z: https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/v3zbr

Processor	AMD Phenom II X4 945
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H
Memory	6gb DDR3-1333
Video Card(s)	Sapphire Radeon HD6870
Storage	Seagate 1tb
Display(s)	Acer AL2216W
Case	Generic
Audio Device(s)	onboard
Power Supply	Ultra LS-550

Processor	Core i7-12700k
Motherboard	Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling	Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s)	RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming
Storage	Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s)	InnoCN 27M2V
Case	Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s)	Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply	FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software	Windows 11 Pro 64-bit

System Name	Dire Wolf IV
Processor	Intel Core i9 14900K
Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z790-I GAMING WIFI
Cooling	Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 w/Thermalright Contact Frame
Memory	2x24GB Corsair DDR5-6600
Video Card(s)	NVIDIA RTX4080 FE
Storage	AORUS Gen4 7300 1TB + Western Digital SN750 500GB
Display(s)	Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED, 3440x1440, 165hz)
Case	Corsair Airflow 2000D
Power Supply	Corsair SF1000L
Mouse	Razer Deathadder Essential
Keyboard	Chuangquan CQ84
Software	Windows 11 Professional

System Name	Core i9 rig / Lenovo laptop
Processor	Core i9 10900X / Core i5 8350U
Motherboard	Asus Prime X299 Edition 30 / Lenovo motherboard
Cooling	Corsair H115i PRO RGB / stock cooler
Memory	Gskill 4x8GB 3600mhz / 16GB 2400mhz
Video Card(s)	Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 Super / UHD 620
Storage	Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB / Samsung OEM 256GB NVMe
Display(s)	Dell UltraSharp UP3017 / Full HD IPS touch
Case	Coolermaster mastercase H500M
Audio Device(s)	Onboard sound
Power Supply	Enermax Platimax 1700 watt / Lenovo 65watt power adapter
Mouse	Logitech M500s
Keyboard	Cherry
Software	Windows 11 Pro / Windows 11 Pro

ASUS GeForce GT 440 1 GB

Shou Miko

sliderider

Zubasa

Yukikaze

mtosev

GSquadron

Over_Lord

News Editor

mudkip

Gzero

Yukikaze

pantherx12

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator

LAN_deRf_HA

danipisika

New Member

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer

Gzero

qu4k3r

cdawall

where the hell are my stars

Oxford

New Member

Oxford

New Member

Casecutter

wteSmithy

Steevo

Casecutter

mudkip

System Name	Dark Stealth
Processor	Ryzen 5 5600x
Motherboard	Gigabyte B450M Gaming rev 1.0
Cooling	Snowman, arctic p12 x2 fans
Memory	16x2 DDR4 Corsair Dominator Pro
Video Card(s)	3080 10gb
Storage	2TB NVME PCIE 4.0 Crucial P3 Plus, 1TB Crucial MX500 SSD, 4TB WD RED HDD
Display(s)	HP Omen 34c (34" monitor 3440x1440 165Hz VA panel)
Case	Zalman S2
Power Supply	Corsair 750TX
Mouse	Logitech pro superlight, mx mouse s3, Razer Basiliskx with battery
Keyboard	Custom mechanical keyboard tm680
Software	Windows 11
Benchmark Scores	70-80 fps 3440x1440 on cyberpunk 2077 max settings

System Name	BAH! - - tHE ECo FReAK
Processor	Athlon II X4 620 @ 1.15V
Motherboard	ASUS 785G EVO
Cooling	Stock
Memory	Corsair Titanium 4GB DDR3 1600MHz C9
Video Card(s)	Sapphire HD5850 @ 1.049v
Storage	Seagate 7200.12 500GB
Display(s)	BenQ G2220HD
Case	Cooler Master Elite 334
Audio Device(s)	Onboard
Power Supply	Corsair VX550W
Software	Windows 7 Ultimate x64

System Name	Silent allround
Processor	i5 750 @ 3,0Ghz 1.04v / 3.4Ghz 1.11v/ 3,6Ghz 1.15v
Motherboard	Gigabyte P55-USB3
Cooling	Thermalright IFX-14 + Scythe Slip Stream 140mm @ 600RPM
Memory	2 x 4GB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 @ 2000 MHz 9-10-10-27 T1
Video Card(s)	Sapphire HD 5870 Vapor-X @ 940/1270
Storage	Intel Postville 80GB SSD & Western Digital Green 2TB
Display(s)	Dell Ultrasharp U2412M
Case	Bitfenix Merc Alpha
Audio Device(s)	Asus Xonar D2 with Unified Drivers
Power Supply	Nexus NX-5000 R3 530W
Software	Windows 7 Home Premium x64
Benchmark Scores	Super pi 1M : 8,549s @ 4,7Ghz (Core i7 920)

Processor	AMD 5800X3D
Motherboard	AsRock X370 Taichi
Cooling	Fractal Design Celsius S24
Memory	2x16gb Crucial e-die 3000MHZ
Video Card(s)	MSI 3070 Trio
Display(s)	Lenovo G27Q-20
Case	Phantec P400
Audio Device(s)	GSP370
Power Supply	EVGA G3 750W
Mouse	Corsair Harpoon Pro
VR HMD	Rift

System Name	My pc
Processor	Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard	Asus Rog b450-f
Cooling	Cooler master 120mm aio
Memory	16gb ddr4 3200mhz
Video Card(s)	MSI Ventus 3x 3070
Storage	2tb intel nvme and 2tb generic ssd
Display(s)	Generic dell 1080p overclocked to 75hz
Case	Phanteks enthoo
Power Supply	650w of borderline fire hazard
Mouse	Some wierd Chinese vertical mouse
Keyboard	Generic mechanical keyboard
Software	Windows ten

System Name	RBMK-1000
Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard	ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling	DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory	2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s)	Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage	Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s)	BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case	Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s)	ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply	Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse	ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard	Gamdias Hermes E2
Software	Windows 11 Pro

System Name	Obelisc
Processor	i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling	H110
Memory	16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s)	GTX 780 Ti
Storage	850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case	T81
Audio Device(s)	X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply	EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software	Win10 64bit

System Name	Ryzen Reflection
Processor	AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard	Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling	2x EK PE360 \| TechN AM4 AMD Block Black \| EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory	Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s)	Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G \| 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage	WD SN850 500GB (OS) \| Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) \| Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s)	Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS \| Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS \| LG 24" IPS 1440p
Case	Lian Li PC-011D XL \| Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s)	FiiO K7 \| Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply	Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse	Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard	Corsair K65 Plus 75% Wireless - USB Mode
Software	Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit

System Name	Tropicaliente \| Digger \| A515-43-R19L
Processor	FX-6300 \| Q6600 \| R3 3200U
Motherboard	ASRock 970 Extreme 4 \| Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 \| Grumpy_PK
Cooling	EVGA CLC120 \| OCZ Vendetta \| Stock
Memory	16GB DDR3-1600 \| 8GB DDR3-1333 \| 16GB DDR4-2666
Video Card(s)	PowerColor RX-570 4GB Red Dragon \| HIS HD5670 1GB IceQ \| Vega 3
Storage	256GB SSD (OS) + 512GB SSD (Games) + 500GB + 2TB + 4TB \| 80GB + 320GB \| 128GB NVME + 512GB SSD
Display(s)	Asus VN247H-P \| KVM USB Switch \| 15.6" FHD
Case	Antec ONE \| Generic Black
Audio Device(s)	on board + Logitech Z623 \| on board \| on board
Power Supply	Cooler Master GX-650 \| Antec VP-450 \| Powerbrick ac/dc
Mouse	MS Wired Desktop 600
Keyboard	MS Wired Desktop 600
Software	Win 10 x64 Pro \| XCP-ng 8.1: XOA, pfSense, RouterOS, FreeNAS, Zabbix \| Win 10 x64 Home

System Name	Moving into the mobile space
Processor	7940HS
Motherboard	HP trash
Cooling	HP trash
Memory	2x8GB
Video Card(s)	4070 mobile
Storage	512GB+2TB NVME
Display(s)	some 165hz thing that isn't as nice as it sounded

System Name	++CUSTOM BUILT MAR. '14++
Processor	Intel Core i7 4930K @4.6GHz (EK Supremacy Elite 2011 block)
Motherboard	Asus Rampage IV Black Edition (EK-FB KIT block)
Cooling	x16 120mm PL2 fans on x2 EK 480 XT rads - two 140mm beQuiet case fans
Memory	32GB Avexir Green LED 2133MHz 1.65v (9-11-10-28 1)
Video Card(s)	Nvidia GTX 780 Ti Classified modded BIOS (EK 780 block)
Storage	2x Samsung 840 PRO 512GB SSD (RAID0) + 2x Samsung 840 EVO 1TB SSD
Display(s)	BenQ XL2420T 144Hz 1ms + Dell 24" UltraSharp U2410 REVA02 + Asus 22" MW221u
Case	Corsair 900D
Audio Device(s)	Asus ROG Xonar Phoebus
Power Supply	SuperFlower Leadex Platinum 1200W Fully Modular 80+ Platinum
Software	OS: Window 8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores	needs to be updated for new system: 3DMark (2013): Firestrike http://www.3dmark.com/fs/477697

System Name	Compy 386
Processor	7800X3D
Motherboard	Asus
Cooling	Air for now.....
Memory	64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s)	7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage	Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s)	55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s)	ATI HDMI
Mouse	Logitech MX518
Keyboard	Razer
Software	A lot.
Benchmark Scores	Its fast. Enough.