- Joined
- Sep 21, 2011
- Messages
- 499 (0.10/day)
System Name | Multipurpose desktop |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.75Ghz , NB @ 2.5 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 (rev 1.0) |
Cooling | Prolimatech Megahalems Rev. C, 2x120mm CM Blademaster |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance LP (4x4GB) @1666Mhz 9-9-9-20-24 1T |
Video Card(s) | ASUS Strix R7-370 4GB OC |
Storage | 2x WD Caviar Black 500GB Sata III in RAID 0 |
Display(s) | Acer S211HL 21.5" 1920x1080 |
Case | Cooler Master Centurion 534+, 3x 120mm CM Sickle Flow |
Power Supply | Seasonic X650 Gold |
Software | Windows 7 x64 Home Premium SP1 |
It's the same thing in all reviews. The only potential bottleneck is ROP's, but I find that unlikely. There has to be something at work in the 79xx cards that makes them so much less efficient than Pitcairn...
Has to be drivers, producing a gpu with a hardware bottleneck is a huge huge huge mistake for the engineers; I can't see that kind of mistake being made, by any engineer, regardless of company.