• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS Radeon RX 7900 GRE TUF OC

Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,987 (3.90/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
its just "playable", i was doing better on my gtx 1050ti in this game. ;) Im getting stuttering weird inconsistent input lag etc. Especially when someone is very close then i cant really do anything. From what i've read 13600k is not affected by stability issues only the 14900 and 13900. I guess ill just save up some money and buy the 7800x3d i assume 5800x3d wouldnt be any different than my current cpu.


14900k got 300+ fps average in this test though? im getting avg like 150-160
So 322fps average means that half of the time, the framerate is lower than that.

Here's a BFV benchmark output from a 4090 and 14900KS that averages 404fps - and you can see that 1% of the time the framerate is under 281fps, which is more than 30% slower and under $300fps. If you want 300fps stutter-free with no dropped frames, then even a 14900KS and 4090 can't quite manage that.

1723988514560.png


With TPU's result of 322fps using a 14900K and 7900GRE, I would imagine that the average spends quite a lot of time below 300fps, and 1% lows are about 220fps.

The extra cache of the X3D models is a massive help for minimum framerates and eliminating stutter/frame-pacing issues. Don't rule out the 5800X3D as a cheap and easy upgrade for your system, here is is matching a far more expensive 12900K that vastly outperforms a 5950X in BF5. Check the TPU 5800X3D review and skip to the frametime analysis if you want to look in more detail.

1723989165620.png

Honestly though, if your BF5 performance feels stuttery and hitchy, try disabling one CCD and running it as an 8-core part. In the BIOS manual overclocking options you can choose "CPU Core Count Control" and turn off all the cores in CCD1 so that you're just using CCD0 (which is usually the better CCD in a dual-CCD CPU).
 

offtempo

New Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2024
Messages
7 (0.12/day)
So 322fps average means that half of the time, the framerate is lower than that.

Here's a BFV benchmark output from a 4090 and 14900KS that averages 404fps - and you can see that 1% of the time the framerate is under 281fps, which is more than 30% slower and under $300fps. If you want 300fps stutter-free with no dropped frames, then even a 14900KS and 4090 can't quite manage that.

View attachment 359555

With TPU's result of 322fps using a 14900K and 7900GRE, I would imagine that the average spends quite a lot of time below 300fps, and 1% lows are about 220fps.

The extra cache of the X3D models is a massive help for minimum framerates and eliminating stutter/frame-pacing issues. Don't rule out the 5800X3D as a cheap and easy upgrade for your system, here is is matching a far more expensive 12900K that vastly outperforms a 5950X in BF5. Check the TPU 5800X3D review and skip to the frametime analysis if you want to look in more detail.

View attachment 359556
Honestly though, if your BF5 performance feels stuttery and hitchy, try disabling one CCD and running it as an 8-core part. In the BIOS manual overclocking options you can choose "CPU Core Count Control" and turn off all the cores in CCD1 so that you're just using CCD0 (which is usually the better CCD in a dual-CCD CPU).
Hmm yeah thanks for the tip I will try disabling 1 ccd. But also even if your frames drop to 220 that doesn't mean you get stutters as long as you are above monitor refresh rate, mine currently has 70 Hz lol. It's not always stutter too, it's hard to pin point what's going on tbh but I'm doing a lot worse than I was doing on 60 fps. Sometimes it is a stuttery mess though if someone jumps out of the window and start shooting me from up close.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,987 (3.90/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Hmm yeah thanks for the tip I will try disabling 1 ccd. But also even if your frames drop to 220 that doesn't mean you get stutters as long as you are above monitor refresh rate, mine currently has 70 Hz lol. It's not always stutter too, it's hard to pin point what's going on tbh but I'm doing a lot worse than I was doing on 60 fps. Sometimes it is a stuttery mess though if someone jumps out of the window and start shooting me from up close.
Oh good lord, buy a monitor before you spend any money on your PC! (Seriously, I'm not joking!!)

Talk about the wrong priorities lol :D

/end of thread
 

offtempo

New Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2024
Messages
7 (0.12/day)
Oh good lord, buy a monitor before you spend any money on your PC! (Seriously, I'm not joking!!)

Talk about the wrong priorities lol :D

/end of thread
What do I need monitor for if I can't play games at least the ones I like. Lol
 
Top